Results for subscale translation from English to Dutch

subscale
the relatively small sample size brings into question the generalisability of our findings and should therefore only be cautiously extended to young adults in other clinical settings. young adults were significantly outnumbered and made up only 25% of the total sample size. it is unclear why fewer young adults entered treatment at ehcymhs, but it may be because adolescents are generally referred to the service by parents, whilst young adults may refer themselves which can require greater autonomy and motivation. the low uptake of young adults is consistent with previous findings that they are the age group least likely to access mental health services in australia (slade et al., 2009). the relatively low numbers highlight the need for further investigation to ensure that young adults have equal access to psychiatric treatment. sdq completion rates were also notably lower for young adults (43% compared to 53%) but were particularly low for parents of young adults (37% compared with 62%). the discrepancy in parent completion rates is not surprising when considering that young adults tend to be more self-sufficient and thus not necessarily require the support of a parent to accompany them to an initial appointment. all in all, it would be of value to inspect the factors related to missing sdqs and the extent to which clinicians engage young people table 3 parent-report inter-scale correlations. inter-scale correlations adolescent sdq (n=532) young adult sdq (n=125) significance of difference emotion-conduct 0.25* 0.31* z=0.65, ns emotion-hyperactivity 0.38* 0.31* z=0.79, ns conduct- hyperactivity 0.52* 0.33* z=2.33, p=0.02 note: ns = not significant. * p ≤ 0.05. table 4 inter-rater agreement (self-report with parent-report). sdq scales adolescent sdq (n = 532) young adult sdq (n = 125) significance of difference emotional symptoms 0.36** 0.48** z=−1.45, ns conduct problems 0.50** 0.39** z=1.37, ns hyperactivity 0.39** 0.31** z=0.91, ns peer problems 0.51** 0.34** z=2.08, p=0.03 prosocial 0.33** 0.35** z=−0.23, ns impact 0.27** 0.40** z=−1.46, ns total difficulties 0.45** 0.40** z=0.61, ns note: ns=not significant; **p ≤ 0.05. p. brann et al. psychiatry research 264 (2018) 340–345 343 and their parents in the process of completing outcome measures and discussing the findings. it may also be worth pursuing other methods of administration such as the use of an electronic version of the sdq to minimise clinician's role in the data collection process and thereby limit the potential for selection bias. future studies may also wish to explore the young adult sdq alone to improve the acceptability of data

travel subscale
subschaal reizen

emotional health subscale
subschaal emotionele gezondheid

aripiprazole demonstrated statistically superior efficacy compared to placebo on the aberrant behaviour checklist irritability subscale.
aripiprazol vertoonde een statistisch superieure werkzaamheid vergeleken met placebo op de aberrant behaviour checklist irritability subschaal.

)l incorrect setting of an ssr code or of an altimeter subscale resulting in, or could result in, a hazardous situation.
)l onjuiste instelling van een ssr-code of van een hoogtemeterschaal die tot een gevaarlijke situatie leidt of kan leiden

similar to the panss total score, both the panss positive and negative subscale scores also showed an improvement (decrease) from baseline over time.
net als de panss-totaalscore vertoonden zowel de positieve als negatieve panss-subschaalscores in de tijd ook een verbetering (afname) vanaf de uitgangswaarde.

the secondary measures of efficacy included global assessments of improvement by the examiner, activities of daily living (adl) subscale scores when off and updrs motor while on.
de secundaire metingen voor doeltreffendheid omvatten globale beoordeling van verbetering door de onderzoeker, activities of daily living (adl) subschaal scores tijdens de “off” periode en updrs motor scores tijdens de “on” periode.

31 clinical benefit parameters the performance status scale, for head and neck (pss-hn) subscales designed to measure understandability of speech, ability to eat in public, and normalcy of diet, was significantly in favor of tpf as compared to pf.
33 klinische voordeel parameters de performance status schaal; voor hoofd-hals (pss-hn) zijn dit de subschalen die de begrijpbaarheid van taal, het vermogen om in het openbaar te eten en een normaal dieet meten; was significant in het voordeel van tpf vergeleken met pf.