Results for our life is enjoy for cherish life translation from English to Hindi

life is enjoy a journey.the ride
जीवन यात्रा है सवारी का आनंद ल

our life is a paradox with god for key .
जीवन एक विराधाभास है यहाँ जिसकी भगवान ही एक कुँजी है ।

everybody say operator life is enjoy life but they don't know
हर कोई जीवन का आनंद लेता है

without book our life is incomplete
किताब

our life is what our thoughts make it
हमारा जीवन वह है जो हमारे विचार इसे बनाते हैं

the purpose of our life is to be happy
हमारे जीवन का उद्देश्य खुश रहना है

hindhi we learn means our life is very easy
हिंदी हम सीखते हैं मतलब हमारा जीवन बहुत आसान है

our life is shaped by our mind, we become what we think
हमारा जीवन हमारे दिमाग से आकार लेता है, हम जो सोचते हैं वह बन जाते हैं

because of our routines we forget that our life is an adventure .
हमारी नित्य की दिनचर्या में हम भूल जाते हैं कि हमारा जीवन तो एक अविरत अद्भुत अनुभव है ।

how beautiful our childhood was then toy was our life and now life is a toy
हमारा बचपन भी कितना खूबसूरत था तब खिलौना ही हमरी जिन्दगी थी और अब जिन्दगी ही खिलौना है

and i love my mother very much. but our life is too much bad going on
और मैं अपनी माँ से बहुत बहुत प्यार करता हूं. परंतु हमारी ज़िन्दगी बहुत ज्यादा ही खराब चल रहा है

stop overthinking the purpose our life is to be happy so just eat sleep ignor & chill
हमारे जीवन का उद्देश्य खुश रहना है, इसलिए बस नींद की अज्ञानता खाएं

the purpose of my life is to be happy so enjoy every moment of our life because life is too short
मेरे जीवन का उद्देश्य खुश रहना है इसलिए हमारे जीवन के हर पल का आनंद लें क्योंकि जीवन बहुत छोटा है

but if all works are to be done with the same forms and on the same lines as they are now done in the ignorance , our gain is only inward and our life is in danger of becoming the dubious and ambiguous formula of an inner light doing the works of an outer twilight , the perfect spirit expressing itself in a mould of imperfection foreign to its own divine nature .
परंतु यदि सभी कर्म वैसे ही आकार - प्रकार के साथ और वैसी ही पद्धति के अनुसार करने होंगे जैसे वे अब अज्ञान में किये जाते हैं , तो हमारी प्राप्ति केवल आन्तरिक होगी और इस बात का भी भय रहेगा कि कहीं हमारा जीवन बाह्य क्षीण ज्योति के कार्यों में लगी अन्तर्ज्योति का एक संदिग्ध ओर अस्पष्ट सूत्र ही न बन जाय ओर परिपूर्ण आत्मा अपनी दिव्य प्रकृति से भिन्न या विजातीय अपूर्णता के सांचे में ही अपने - आपको प्रकट न करती रहे ।

human interference with our environment is excessive, and the situation is rapidly worsening due to our population growth. policies must therefore be changed. these policies affect basic economic, technological, and ideological structures. the way to these policy changes is in the “deep ecology” ecosophy (110). deep ecology is a philosophical way of looking at our environmental problems that was founded in 1972 by norwegian arne naess, a former head of the philosophy department at the university of oslo. naess’ writings show us what is wrong with the world and give us a blueprint by which we can bring about change. in its most basic form, deep ecology is a necessary wisdom, requiring humans to see themselves as part of the bigger picture. that picture is our sacred relationship with earth and all beings. many believe overpopulation, the greenhouse effect, global warming, and loss of habitat are no cause for alarm. some, in fact, claim media and politicians perpetuate the hysteria regarding our environmental decline because they have something to gain by painting such a bad picture. countless studies i have read or am personally involved with, however, have convinced me these problems are real and can be resolved if the following are supported: 1. continued inquiry into the appropriate human roles on our planet. 2. root cause analysis of unsustainable practices. 3. reduction of human consumption. 4. conservation and restoration of ecosystems. 5. a life of committed action for earth. (oslo 1973) the solution to our ecosystem mess is through the principles dr. naess has developed. these principles begin with a statement that all life, human and nonhuman, has intrinsic value. this means everything about life is valuable, including individuals, cultures, species, habitats, and populations. another principle states that the diversity of life forms contribute to our appreciation of their value, but these forms also have value in and of themselves. a person with first hand experience, or one who works in the ecological field, is mindful of the live-and-let-live axiom but, unfortunately, most relate this only to humans. naess makes it another principle that humans have no right to reduce riches, resources, and diversity of life, except to fulfill vital needs. human interference with the nonhuman world is out of control and getting worse (drengson). . therefore, the another principle requires strategies be put in place for the first-world nations to overcome delusions and laziness on these issues the next principle requires a major change in the policies that affect our economic, technologic and ideological norms. our society's values are geared toward wealth and technological advancement, which result in reckless buying and careless disposal of our mass waste (burton 2002). we need to appreciate life’s quality instead of what society sets as standards. this is the next principle, but the notion is difficult to characterize since quality of life cannot be quantified. the last principle simply states that if you believe in what deep ecology teaches, then you should do your best to employ those changes. as you can see, the fundamental principles of deep ecology outlined in arne naess’ writings demand radical changes in our life. changes that affect our population growth, hazardous waste, and global warming dilemmas must include birth control, recycling, and yielding sustainable resources for energy and building. population growth drives or multiplies most of our environmental problems. between 1900 and 1999, world population quadrupled. just between 1960 and 1999 it more than doubled, from three billion to over six billion and currently, we are growing more than 80 million people every year (2002 world population data sheet). this growth means more energy and resource needs, more land occupied, and more waste. as population and consumption increase, there are fewer resources available per person. at some point, there are not enough resources to go around, and scarcity occurs. resource scarcity is the root of many problems. if there are not enough resources to adequately support the population, poverty results. greater environmental destruction occurs, as people are forced to over-exploit the resource base (burton 2002). scarcity leads to discrimination, because when resources are scarce, someone gets less. girls, women, ethnic or religious minorities, the poor, and the elderly are most often victims of this (population reference bureau 2002). scarcity also leads to migration, conflict between bands, tribes or nations as they fight to obtain resources. this has been evidenced by the aztec people’s demise. we should teach the deep ecology philosophy in school when the kids are small. this will ensure that our earth’s future will be in the hands of humans who have appreciation of our world and its inhabitants, living and nonliving. it will teach harmony instead of killing and dominance because deep ecology discards the survival of the fittest concept. (oslo 1973) in closing, the earth is a living entity that is being snuffed-out by too many people. selfishness and egocentricity is rampant and these attitudes need to be changed. the deep ecology philosophy, if made available to the world will do this. just as philosophies taught by aristotle, hume, and kant have open the door to new thinking, so can naess beliefs.
पर्यावरण की मराठी निबंध महत्व