Trying to learn how to translate from the human translation examples.
From professional translators, enterprises, web pages and freely available translation repositories.
the dream was very full of joy because i and u were in a single enjoy with one another
the dream was very full of joy because i and u were in a single enjoy with one another
Last Update: 2023-10-12
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
* "if u were the girl" contém sample de "down 4 my niggas" de c-murder.
* "if u were the girl" contains a sample of c-murder' 2000 "down 4 my niggas".
Last Update: 2016-03-03
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
Warning: Contains invisible HTML formatting
k a ž d ý č n í op era pro g r a m v y p r a co v á v á č l en sk ý st á t n eb o j a k ý k o l i č en ý o rg á n č l en sk ý m u r st á tem ve sp o l up r á ci sp a r t n e r y u ve den ý m i č lá n k u v 11.
each operational programme shall be drawn up by the member state or any authority designated by the member state, in cooperation with the partners referred to in article 11.
Last Update: 2014-02-06
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
antes p 0 a ra 2 " a r a t t a i3eparazioneedivorzionel$)0r i t a l i an o w c a p� t u lo 8 8 )) do volume ))do4rattatodi$iritodifamiglia a cu ra d i ' & e r r an do � & o r t i no � & 2 uffs c e l lo - i l a no p pode conceber seo artigo � como uma m an i f effs t a �� o de ieurochauvinismowqueosautores a me r i c a nos como * u en g e r ou v o n - e h r en a t r i b u� a m j � �#on v en �� o de " r u x e l as de ! este respeito n � o obs t an te p e r m an e c e p l en a me n te v � l i do de m o me n t o o trabalho m a i s a m p lo sobre esta m a t � r i a c o n t i do em ! " o r r � s i , a p r o te c c i � n de los h i j os comunesconmotivodelacrisis matrimonial en e l # o n v en i o de de m a y o de sobre la c o m p e te n cia judicial e l reco n o c i m i en t o y la e j e cu c i � n de r effs o l u c i o n e s em m a t � r i a matrimonial w $ i s y u n t i vfias en los p l e i t os matrimonial e s de se para c i � n y d i v o r c i o - a d r i d ! s s o cia� � o %spanholade!dvogadosde f a m � l i a p a 0 o n t os e do 2 e l a t � r i o " o r r � s # o m o j � referido anteriormente o te m a da responsabilidadeparental foi a m p l a me n te m o d i fi c ado n o2egulamento # % n � m as n � o se pode de i x a r de fazer r ef e r � n cia � s dispo s i �� effs in c l u� das no texto ainda v i g en te do2egulamento # % n � /s tribunais previstos no artigo � deste � l t i m o a c t u a l artigo � que p r ev � os tribunais para os l i t � g i os m a t r i m o n i a i s t � m uma vis a t r a c t i vfia para c o n h e cer do te m a da responsabilidadeparental e d a � as regras de c o m p e t � n cia contidas no artigo � e no artigo � domesmo regulamento 0 o r � m trata se de uma vis a t r a c t i vfia l i m i t a da em v � r i os se n t i dos %mprimeiro l ug a r em r e l a �� o aos filhos que a f e c t a p o i s s � o apenas os filhos c o m u n s quer bi o l � g i c os quer a d opt i v os m as n � o outros filhos que p u de s sem ser por e x e m p lo f r u t o de uma u n i � o an te r i o r de umdos c � n j ug e s %m segundo l ug a r a f e c tar � u n i c a me n t eos filhos que tenham a r effs i d � n cia habitual no%stado cujas autoridades s � o competentes para de c i d i r sobreo d i v � r c i o eos filhos que residamnoutro%stado-embrounicamenteseseverificaremascircuns t � n cias p r ev i sfft as excluindo totalmente a aplica �� o do regulamento em r e l a �� o a um fi lho que tenhaa sua r effs i d � n cia habitual num%stado n � o
r t i c l e s and " u t that for c e of a t t r action is limited in s e v e r al re s p e c t s & i r s t l y inrelationtothe children af f e c t e d w h o can only be the childrenofboth spouses whether biological or adopted but not other children such as for in s t ance the children of one or other of the spouses from a previous u n i on 3 e con d l y itwill af f e c t only children habitually re s i d ent in the3tate whose authoritieshavejurisdictionforthedivorcejudgmentandwillaffectthose residinginanother3tateonlyiftheconditionslaiddownaremet�under nocircumstanceswilltheregulationapplytoachildhabituallyresidentin anon member 3tate & in al l y the jurisdictionof the di v o r c e courts in re l a tiontoparentalresponsibilityforthechildrenofbothspousesisnotun limited per p e t u a t i o jurisdic t i o n i s � itwill c e a s e on termination of the m a t r i m o n i al proce e d in g s w e e k in & r ance where his w if e anon #ommunity national re s i d e s with the childrenofboth spouses # o n c l u s i on dis p u t e d by ! "o n o m i @ ) l 2 e g o l a m e n to comunitariosullacompetenzaesul riconoscimentoinmateria m a t r i m o n i al e e di po t e s t � de i g e n i to r i 2ivistadi$irittointernazionale p and by ( 4 a g a r as @ 1 u e s t i o n s s p �c i al e s re l a t i v e s � l u n i l c a tion communautairedudroit international p r i v � de l a f a m i l l e r � g l e ment � l an g e s e n h o m m a g e � * e an 6 i c t or , o u is 6 o l "russels p p n & or the dis c u s s i on of the scopeof !rticle n o w !rticle andits relationshipwiththeprovisionin !rticle n o w !rticle see * 9 # a r l i e r e t al @ , e r � g l e ment d e " r u x e l l e s )) � # o m p � t e n c e re con n a i s s ance e t ex �c u tion e n m a t i �re m a t r i m o n i al e e t e n m a t i �re de re s po n s a b i l it� p a re n t al e op c it )n po in t !rticle n o w !rticle thus creates a g e n u in e @ %uropean c i t i z e n s h i p p r i v i l e g e as described by 3 $ r o u e t , a v � n e ment d e @ " r u x e l l e s )) � m o i re de $ % ! 5 n i v e r s it� d e . an t e s p p n & or 2 " a r a t t a @ 3 ep a r a z i one e di v o r z i o n e l $ )0 r i t al i a no # a p 88 )) de l v o l )) de l 4 r a t t a to di $ i r i t to di f a m i g l i a a c u r a di ' & e r r an do � & o r t in o � & 2 u s c e l l o - i l an p !rticle can beseenasamanifestationofthe @ % u r o c h au v ini s m with which !mericanauthorssuchas*uenger andvon-ehrenhavealreadytaxed the "russels #onvention / n that i s sue the con t ent of themostextensiveworkonthe subjectneverthelessremains e n t i re l y v al i d for the m o ment ! "o r r � s @ , a pro t e c c i � n de l o s h i jo s comunesconmotivodelacrisis m a t r i m o n i al e n e l # o n v e n i o de de m a y o de s o b re l a c o m p e t e n c i a judicial e l re con o c i m i e n to y l a eje c u c i � n de resolucionesenmateria m a t r i m o n i al $ i s y u n t i v as e n l o s p l e i to s m a t r i m o n i al e s de s ep a r a c i � n y di v o r c i o ! s o c i a c i � n % s p a � o l a de ! bo g a d o s de & a m i l i a - a d r i d p p n 0o in t s and ofthe "o r r � s re po r t )n the new regulation 2egulation % # .o these matters are dealtwith in 3ection where s i g n i l c an t amendments have been introduced 4he provisions h e re could be g r o up e d under the following h e a d ings the general rule jurisdiction in cases of c h i l d abduction jurisdictionof the authorities in the-ember3tateof the di v o r c e jurisdiction based on
Last Update: 2014-02-06
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
Warning: Contains invisible HTML formatting
Some human translations with low relevance have been hidden.
Show low-relevance results.