acknowledgement

Acknowledgement by Melaka State Department on Welltrack System with Monitoring Centre.

Huruf

Note: In Section 5 of the KPI, you are required to acknowledge and determine whether the probationers shall be confirmed or not, and need to be signed by: 1. Staff 2. Assessment Officer 3. Response Assessment Officer

Nota :Di Seksyen 5 KPI tersebut, tuan-tuan perlulah memberikan persetujuan samada untuk mengesahkan jawatan petugas tersebut atau tidak dan perlulah lengkap ditandatangi oleh 1. Petugas 2. Pegawai Penilai 3. Pegawai Penilai Balas

b) Building form and massing Traditional zoning ordinances deal with this aspect of physical form by setting specifics of height, setbacks, and coverage. There are also more elaborate and involved regulations concerning form massing that the Urban Design Plan of San Francisco (1970) refers to as ‘height’ and ‘bulk’ and the Long Beach, California, Design Guide Lines (1980) refers to as ‘building appearance and configuration’. This last description brings a new issue into play: appearance. Are we not concerned about what the building look like as well as their height and bulk? Their colors, materials, textures and the façade forms. Today, we must acknowledge that there are as many opportunities for adverse effects as there are for the positive qualities associated with the appearance of a building. An example of the problem that can be associated with the appearance is the amount of glare caused by glass boxed office towers. On the positive side, we might find the façade of a building designed to relate harmoniously and compatibly with the surrounding historic buildings so as the enhance the entire area. Building form and massing, there fore, encompasses height, bulk, floor area ratio (FAR), coverage, street – line setbacks, style, scale, material, texture, color and storefront design . With this, it can assure harmonious relationship between building, the immediate visual environment and the overall downtown design framework (fig2-7).(fig 2-8) express clearly the differences between two distinct appearances for one building. These example illustrate various ways different cities have defined the elements of building forms and massing. Therefore, as an essential element of urban design , building form and massing require in depth – analysis of urban architecture as well as public health and safety requirement (fig 2 -11).

b) Building form and massing Traditional zoning ordinances deal with this aspect of physical form by setting specifics of height, setbacks, and coverage. There are also more elaborate and involved regulations concerning form massing that the Urban Design Plan of San Francisco (1970) refers to as ‘height’ and ‘bulk’ and the Long Beach, California, Design Guide Lines (1980) refers to as ‘building appearance and configuration’. This last description brings a new issue into play: appearance. Are we not concerned about what the building look like as well as their height and bulk? Their colors, materials, textures and the façade forms. Today, we must acknowledge that there are as many opportunities for adverse effects as there are for the positive qualities associated with the appearance of a building. An example of the problem that can be associated with the appearance is the amount of glare caused by glass boxed office towers. On the positive side, we might find the façade of a building designed to relate harmoniously and compatibly with the surrounding historic buildings so as the enhance the entire area. Building form and massing, there fore, encompasses height, bulk, floor area ratio (FAR), coverage, street – line setbacks, style, scale, material, texture, color and storefront design . With this, it can assure harmonious relationship between building, the immediate visual environment and the overall downtown design framework (fig2-7).(fig 2-8) express clearly the differences between two distinct appearances for one building. These example illustrate various ways different cities have defined the elements of building forms and massing. Therefore, as an essential element of urban design , building form and massing require in depth – analysis of urban architecture as well as public health and safety requirement (fig 2 -11).

b) Building form and massing Traditional zoning ordinances deal with this aspect of physical form by setting specifics of height, setbacks, and coverage. There are also more elaborate and involved regulations concerning form massing that the Urban Design Plan of San Francisco (1970) refers to as ‘height’ and ‘bulk’ and the Long Beach, California, Design Guide Lines (1980) refers to as ‘building appearance and configuration’. This last description brings a new issue into play: appearance. Are we not concerned about what the building look like as well as their height and bulk? Their colors, materials, textures and the façade forms. Today, we must acknowledge that there are as many opportunities for adverse effects as there are for the positive qualities associated with the appearance of a building. An example of the problem that can be associated with the appearance is the amount of glare caused by glass boxed office towers. On the positive side, we might find the façade of a building designed to relate harmoniously and compatibly with the surrounding historic buildings so as the enhance the entire area. Building form and massing, there fore, encompasses height, bulk, floor area ratio (FAR), coverage, street – line setbacks, style, scale, material, texture, color and storefront design . With this, it can assure harmonious relationship between building, the immediate visual environment and the overall downtown design framework (fig2-7).(fig 2-8) express clearly the differences between two distinct appearances for one building. These example illustrate various ways different cities have defined the elements of building forms and massing. Therefore, as an essential element of urban design , building form and massing require in depth – analysis of urban architecture as well as public health and safety requirement (fig 2 -11).

b) Building form and massing Traditional zoning ordinances deal with this aspect of physical form by setting specifics of height, setbacks, and coverage. There are also more elaborate and involved regulations concerning form massing that the Urban Design Plan of San Francisco (1970) refers to as ‘height’ and ‘bulk’ and the Long Beach, California, Design Guide Lines (1980) refers to as ‘building appearance and configuration’. This last description brings a new issue into play: appearance. Are we not concerned about what the building look like as well as their height and bulk? Their colors, materials, textures and the façade forms. Today, we must acknowledge that there are as many opportunities for adverse effects as there are for the positive qualities associated with the appearance of a building. An example of the problem that can be associated with the appearance is the amount of glare caused by glass boxed office towers. On the positive side, we might find the façade of a building designed to relate harmoniously and compatibly with the surrounding historic buildings so as the enhance the entire area. Building form and massing, there fore, encompasses height, bulk, floor area ratio (FAR), coverage, street – line setbacks, style, scale, material, texture, color and storefront design . With this, it can assure harmonious relationship between building, the immediate visual environment and the overall downtown design framework (fig2-7).(fig 2-8) express clearly the differences between two distinct appearances for one building. These example illustrate various ways different cities have defined the elements of building forms and massing. Therefore, as an essential element of urban design , building form and massing require in depth – analysis of urban architecture as well as public health and safety requirement (fig 2 -11).

kll