You searched for: procedure text use laptop [ Turn off colors ]
From professional translators, enterprises, web pages and freely available translation repositories.
Last Update: 2013-02-08
Last Update: 2012-12-23
Last Update: 2012-09-10
Last Update: 2011-01-06
Last Update: 2014-09-23
Last Update: 2014-09-08
This Page Will Allow You To Create Your Own Ad Products. Use the Tabs To Create, Text, Image or Video Ads
*NOTE Advertisers cannot purchase ads on your website until your ad zone code has been placed on your website. Once the AdHitz system verifies placement of the code, your ad zones can then be purchased. After your ad zones and types are set, you should create code to place on your website. Create code by Clicking Here.
Last Update: 2014-09-05
00:00:00,100 --> 00:00:01,600
Previously on criminal minds...
00:00:01,700 --> 00:00:03,400
Elle, 2 weeks of pure heaven.
00:00:03,500 --> 00:00:04,600
Do not call me for anything.
00:00:04,700 --> 00:00:06,300
Have a great time. You
all deserve a break.
00:00:06,400 --> 00:00:07,500
Welcome to paradise.
00:00:07,600 --> 00:00:09,000
Your resort is beautiful.
00:00:09,100 --> 00:00:12,000
A man said there had
been a murder in room 19.
00:00:12,100 --> 00:00:13,000
Get down! Aah!
00:00:13,100 --> 00:00:14,500
Who are you?!
00:00:14,600 --> 00:00:15,800
Where is the victim's head?
00:00:15,900 --> 00:00:16,900
I'm here on vacation.
00:00:17,000 --> 00:00:18,600
From jamaica. Someone sent you a head?
00:00:18,600 --> 00:00:20,300
Morgan and elle are
in jamaica right now.
00:00:20,400 --> 00:00:21,500
Agent greenaway wasn't even here
00:00:21,600 --> 00:00:22,600
When this man was killed.
00:00:22,600 --> 00:00:23,700
How did he know where we were?
00:00:23,800 --> 00:00:25,500
A man came to the door with something
00:00:25,600 --> 00:00:26,500
He said you would need right away.
00:00:26,600 --> 00:00:27,700
He came to the door?
00:00:27,700 --> 00:00:29,100
I was playing a game yesterday.
00:00:29,200 --> 00:00:31,500
The hacker could have gotten
into my computer first.
00:00:31,600 --> 00:00:34,100
I have far less protection
on my own laptop.
00:00:34,200 --> 00:00:35,500
How could you be that stupid?
00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:37,000
I found him. You what?
00:00:37,100 --> 00:00:38,100
I know who he is, the hacker,
00:00:38,100 --> 00:00:39,100
His name's geist.
00:00:39,200 --> 00:00:40,500
Now you're on a quest.
00:00:40,600 --> 00:00:42,200
A young girl's life depends
00:00:42,300 --> 00:00:43,800
On the successful completion of it.
00:00:43,900 --> 00:00:46,100
00:00:46,200 --> 00:00:48,900
The one rule is, only
the members of your team
00:00:49,000 --> 00:00:50,500
May participate in the quest.
00:00:51,800 --> 00:00:52,800
He's given us all the clues
00:00:52,800 --> 00:00:54,700
Needed to complete this quest,
00:00:54,800 --> 00:00:56,300
Including this book code.
00:00:56,400 --> 00:00:58,900
Each one of these sets of numbers
represents a particular word.
00:00:58,900 --> 00:01:00,200
From what book?
00:01:00,200 --> 00:01:02,200
Jj, get some reporters
here as soon as possible.
00:01:02,200 --> 00:01:04,100
Didn't he say that we had
to keep this under the team?
00:01:04,200 --> 00:01:05,500
We're looking for this man...
00:01:05,500 --> 00:01:08,400
No, no, no, no, i said no outsiders.
00:01:08,500 --> 00:01:10,000
00:01:10,100 --> 00:01:11,300
Anderson, take greenaway home.
00:01:11,400 --> 00:01:12,900
Yes, sir. Get some sleep.
00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:15,400
I told you, it was one rule.
00:01:15,500 --> 00:01:16,600
00:01:21,200 --> 00:01:22,900
"The defects and faults of the mind
00:01:22,900 --> 00:01:25,200
"Are like wounds in the body.
00:01:25,200 --> 00:01:26,300
"After all imaginable
care has been taken
00:01:26,400 --> 00:01:28,700
"To heal them up,
00:01:28,700 --> 00:01:32,400
Still there will be a scar left behind."
00:01:32,400 --> 00:01:35,000
French writer francois la rochefoucauld.
00:01:41,400 --> 00:01:42,500
Sir, i thought you'd want to know.
00:01:42,500 --> 00:01:44,700
We identified the girl in the video...
00:01:44,800 --> 00:01:46,400
00:01:46,400 --> 00:01:48,500
Leave it on the desk.
00:02:07,000 --> 00:02:09,400
Reid, how many books do you
think are published in a year?
00:02:09,400 --> 00:02:10,600
In the whole world?
00:02:10,600 --> 00:02:11,700
00:02:11,800 --> 00:02:14,400
Great, and all we gotta do is find one.
00:02:16,100 --> 00:02:17,800
You know, i can see this unsub
00:02:17,800 --> 00:02:19,000
Gettin' our phone numbers and addresses
00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:20,000
From the bureau personnel files,
00:02:20,100 --> 00:02:21,400
But come on, man,
00:02:21,500 --> 00:02:23,700
It really says in there
that gideon digs nellie fox?
00:02:23,800 --> 00:02:25,700
Or that jj collects butterflies?
00:02:25,700 --> 00:02:27,600
I didn't even know
these things about us.
00:02:27,700 --> 00:02:29,200
"Ever would it be night,
00:02:29,200 --> 00:02:31,900
But always clear day
to any man's sight."
00:02:31,900 --> 00:02:34,800
Reid, not again with the poem
from the music box, please.
00:02:34,800 --> 00:02:35,900
There's something familiar about it.
00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:38,800
I think i've heard it somewhere before.
00:02:38,900 --> 00:02:40,400
Thought you had a photographic memory.
00:02:40,400 --> 00:02:41,700
00:02:41,800 --> 00:02:43,100
And that's primarily
related to things i read.
00:02:43,200 --> 00:02:45,100
Like i said, this is
something i think i've heard.
00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:46,200
Which leaves us...
00:02:46,300 --> 00:02:47,200
Nowhere, that's where it leaves is.
00:02:47,300 --> 00:02:48,300
00:02:48,400 --> 00:02:49,400
How would we proceed
00:02:49,500 --> 00:02:52,000
If we didn't have all these clues?
00:02:52,100 --> 00:02:53,500
What's the first thing we'd look at?
00:02:53,600 --> 00:02:54,900
00:02:54,900 --> 00:02:56,500
Why this particular victim
in this particular place
00:02:56,600 --> 00:02:57,600
At this particular time?
00:02:57,600 --> 00:02:59,100
We have a victim, don't we?
00:02:59,200 --> 00:03:01,200
00:03:01,300 --> 00:03:03,400
Missin' out of south boston, virginia.
00:03:03,400 --> 00:03:05,300
You can get there in a
few hours if you hurry.
00:03:05,400 --> 00:03:07,900
Take jj. Find out everything
there is to know about this girl.
00:03:07,900 --> 00:03:08,900
You go it.
00:03:08,900 --> 00:03:10,000
Been lettin' him lead us around
00:03:10,100 --> 00:03:11,000
Like he's somethin' more than he is.
00:03:11,100 --> 00:03:12,600
He's just another unsub.
00:03:12,600 --> 00:03:13,800
Let's start puttin' together a profile.
00:03:13,900 --> 00:03:15,300
What you want me to do?
00:03:15,400 --> 00:03:16,500
Just keep workin' on this.
00:03:16,500 --> 00:03:18,100
If anybody can put it together, you can.
00:03:40,600 --> 00:03:42,400
Please help me.
00:03:48,000 --> 00:03:49,000
Last Update: 2014-07-24
Pentingnya SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) Keberadaan SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) sangat penting bagi operasional suatu perusahaan. Dengan SOP kita bisa mengantisipasi berbagai situasi yang mungkin terjadi dalam menjalankan bisnis kita. SOP ini harus kita perjuangkan sejak kita mendirikan perusahaan. Pada tahap awal sop ini terlihat sederhana, tetapi seiring dengan perjalanan menjalankan bisnis kita akan semakin memperlengkapi sop kita. SOP akan memberi arah bagi staf perusahaan dalan menjalankan pekerjaannya. Dengan adanya SOP maka karyawan mengetahui lingkup pekerjaannya. Dengan kejelasan ruang lingkup ini, maka job description akan jelas sehingga tidak tumpang tindih. Dengan demikian maka kinerja staf perusahaan akan terjaga dengan baik. SOP ini bisa kita bagi ke dalam berbagai bidang misalnya: 1. SOP dalam menangani calon client 2. SOP dalam mengerjakan project 3. SOP layanan purna jual 4. SOP quality control 5. SOP keuangan 6. SOP penanganan barang dan lain-lain 7. Karena sop ini memakai berbagai skill yang dimiliki beberapa staf, maka kita bisa membagi sub- sub tersebut kepada staf yang memiliki keahlian sesuai bidangnya. SOP ini harus terus dievaluasi dan dikembangkan. Dalam periode tertentu minimal 6 bulan sekali SOP harus dievaluasi dan diperbarui untuk perbaikan kinerja perusahaan secara menyeluruh.
Last Update: 2014-04-03
Nomor : 080/SK/II/2014 12 Februari 2014
Lampiran : -
Hal : Pesanan Barang
Bapak Wijaya Lee toko “Pelangi Elektronik”
Jl. Gatot Subroto No. 26
Berdasarkan informasi yang kami terima dari brousur anda pada tanggal 05 februari 2014, no 55/PE/SP/II/2014 kami ingin memesang barang-barang elektronik di toko anda yaitu sebagai berikut :
NAMA BARANG MEREK BANYAKNYA HARGA JUMLAH
1 Netbook Aple 2 buah Rp.5.000.000 Rp.20.000.000
2 Laptop Toshiba 3 buah Rp.4.000.000 Rp.12.000.000
3 Printer Cannon 6 buah Rp.400.000 Rp.2.400.000
4 LCD Thosiba 1 buah Rp.5.000.000 RP.5.000.000
Kami berharap barang-barang yang dipesan tiba di perusahaan paling lambat 1 minggu setelah pemesanan.
Mengenai pembayaran akan segera kami kirimkan setelah barang kami terima.
Atas perhatian dan kerjasama Saudara kami mengucapkan terima kasih.
Wahyudi Sri lokeswara,ST
Last Update: 2014-02-25
Predicting Australian Takeover Targets:
A Logit Analysis
* Discipline of Finance,
School of Finance,
The University of Sydney
Positive announcement-day adjusted returns to target shareholders in the event of a
takeover are well documented. Investors who are able to accurately predict firms that
will be the subject of a takeover attempt should be able to earn these excess returns. In
this paper a series of probabilistic regression models were developed that use financial
statement variables suggested by prior research as explanatory variables. The models,
applied to in-sample and out-of-sample data, led to predictions of takeover targets that
were better than chance in all cases. The economic outcome resulting from holding a
portfolio of the predicted targets over the prediction period are also analysed.
Keywords: takeovers, targets, prediction, classification, logit analysis
JEL Codes: G11, G17, G23, G34
This is a draft copy and not to be quoted.
In this paper our aim is to accurately predict companies that will become takeover
targets. Theoretically, if it is possible to predict takeovers with accuracy greater than
chance, it should be possible to generate abnormal returns from holding a portfolio of
the predicted targets. Evidence of abnormal returns of 20% to 30% made by
shareholders of firms on announcement of a takeover bid is why prediction of these
events is of interest to academics and practitioners alike.
The modelling approach adopted in this study was based on the discrete choice
approach used by Palepu (1986) and Barnes (1999). The models were based on
financial statement information, using variables suggested by the numerous theories
that have been put forward to explain takeover activity. The performance of the
models was evaluated using statistical criteria. Further, the predictions from the
models were rated against chance and economic criteria through the formation and
tracking of a portfolio of predicted targets. Positive results were found under both
Takeover prediction studies are a logical extension of the work of Altman (1968)
who used financial statement information to explain corporate events. Early studies by
Simkowitz and Monroe (1971) and Stevens (1973) were based on the Multiple
Discriminant Analysis (MDA) technique. Stevens (1973) coupled MDA with factor
analysis to eliminate potential multicollinearity problems and reported a predictive
accuracy of 67.5%, suggesting that takeover prediction was viable. Belkaoui (1978)
and Rege (1984) conducted similar analyses in Canada with Belkaoui (1978)
confirming the results of these earlier researchers and reporting a predictive accuracy
of 85% . Concerns were raised by Rege (1984) who was unable to predict with similar
accuracy. These concerns were also raised in research by others such as Singh (1971)
and Fogelberg, Laurent, and McCorkindale (1975).
Reacting to the wide criticism of the MDA method, researchers began to use
discrete choice models as the basis of their research. Harris et al. (1984) used probit
analysis to develop a model and found that it had extremely high explanatory power,
but were unable to discriminate between target and non-target firms with any degree
of accuracy. Dietrich and Sorensen (1984) continued this work using a logit model
and achieved a classification accuracy rate of 90%. Palepu (1986) addressed a number
of methodological problems in takeover prediction. He suggested the use of statebased
prediction samples where a number of targets were matched with non-targets
for the same sample period. While this approach was appropriate for the estimation
sample, it exaggerated accuracies within the predictive samples because the estimated
error rates in these samples were not indicative of error rates within the population of
firms. He also proposed the use of an optimal cut-off point derivation which
considered the decision problem at hand. On the basis of this rectified methodology,
along with the application of a logit model to a large sample of US firms, Palepu
(1986) provided evidence that the ability of the model was no better than a chance
selection of target and non-target firms. Barnes (1999) also used the logit model and a
modified version of the optimal cut-off rule on UK data. His results indicated that a
portfolio of predicted targets may have been consistent with Palepu’s finding, but he
was unable to document this in the UK context due to model inaccuracy.
In the following section the economic explanations underlying takeover activity
are discussed. Section 3 outlines our takeover hypotheses and describes the
explanatory variables that are used in the modelling procedure. The modelling
framework and data used in the study is contained in Section 4, while the results of
our model estimation, predictions, classification accuracy and portfolio economic
outcomes are found in Section 5. We conclude in Section 6.
2. Economic explanations of takeover activity
Economic explanations of takeover activity have suggested the explanatory
variables that were included in this discrete choice model development study. Jensen
and Meckling (1976) posited that agency problems occurred when decision making
and risk bearing were separated between management and stakeholders1, leading to
management inefficiencies. Manne (1965) and Fama (1980) theorised that a
mechanism existed that ensured management acted in the interests of the vast number
of small non-controlling shareholders2. They suggested that a market for corporate
control existed in which alternative management teams competed for the rights to
control corporate assets. The threat of acquisition aligned management objectives
with those of stakeholders as managers are terminated in the event of an acquisition in
order to rectify inefficient management of the firm’s assets. Jensen and Ruback
(1983) suggested that both capital gains and increased dividends are available to an
1 Stakeholders are generally considered to be both stock and bond holders of a corporation.
2 We take the interests of shareholders to be in the maximization of the present value of the firm.
acquirer who could eliminate the inefficiencies created by target management, with
the attractiveness of the firm for takeover increasing with the level of inefficiency.
Jensen (1986) looked at the agency costs of free cash flow, another form of
management inefficiency. In this case, free cash flow referred to cash flows in excess
of positive net present value (NPV) investment opportunities and normal levels of
financial slack (retained earnings). The agency cost of free cash flow is the negative
NPV value that arises from investing in negative NPV projects rather than returning
funds to investors. Jensen (1986) suggested that the market value of the firm should
be discounted by the expected agency costs of free cash flow. These, he argued, were
the costs that could be eliminated either by issuing debt to fund an acquisition of
stock, or through merger with, or acquisition of a growing firm that had positive NPV
investments and required the use of these excess funds. Smith and Kim (1994)
combined the financial pecking order argument of Myers and Majluf (1984) with the
free cash flow argument of Jensen (1986) to create another motivational hypothesis
that postulated inefficient firms forgo profitable investment opportunities because of
informational asymmetries. Further, Jensen (1986) argued that, due to information
asymmetries that left shareholders less informed, management was more likely to
undertake negative NPV projects rather than returning funds to investors. Smith and
Kim (1994) suggested that some combination of these firms, like an inefficient firm
and an efficient acquirer, would be the optimal solution to the two respective resource
allocation problems. This, they hypothesised, would result in a market value for the
combined entity that exceeded the sum of the individual values of the firms. This is
one form of financial synergy that can arise in merger situations.
Another form of financial synergy is that which results from a combination of
characteristics of the target and bidding firms. Jensen (1986) suggested that an
optimal capital structure exists, whereby the marginal benefits and marginal costs of
debt are equal. At this point, the cost of capital for a firm is minimised. This
suggested that increases in leverage will only be viable for those firms who have free
cash flow excesses, and not for those which have an already high level of debt.
Lewellen (1971) proposed that in certain situations, financial efficiencies may be
realized without the realization of operational efficiencies. These efficiencies relied
on a simple Miller and Modigliani (1964) model. It proposed that, in the absence of
corporate taxes, an increase in a firm’s leverage to reasonable levels would increase
the value of the equity share of the company due to a lower cost of capital. By a
merger of two firms, where either one or both had not utilised their borrowing
capacity, would result in a financial gain. This financial gain would represent a
valuation gain above that of the sum of the equity values of the individual firms.
However, this result is predicated on the assumption that the firms need to either
merge or be acquired in order to achieve this result.
Merger waves are well documented in the literature. Gort (1969) suggested that
industry disturbances are the source of these merger waves, his argument being that
they occurred in response to discrepancies between the valuation of a firm by
shareholders and potential acquirers. As a consequence of economic shocks (such as
deregulation, changes in input or output prices, etc.), expectations concerning future
cash flow became more variable. This results in an increased probability that the value
the acquirer places on a potential target is greater than its current owner’s valuation.
The result is a possible offer and subsequent takeover. Mitchell and Mulherin (1996),
in their analysis of mergers and acquisitions in the US during the 1980s, provided
evidence that mergers and acquisitions cluster by industries and time. Their analysis
confirmed the theoretical and empirical evidence provided by Gort (1969) and
provided a different view suggesting that mergers, acquisitions, and leveraged
buyouts were the least cost method of adjusting to the economic shocks borne by an
These theories suggested a clear theoretical base on which to build takeover
prediction models. As a result, eight main hypotheses for the motivation of a merger
or acquisition have been formulated, along with twenty three possible explanatory
variables to be incorporated predictive models.
3. Takeover hypotheses and explanatory variables
The most commonly accepted motivation for takeovers is the inefficient
management hypothesis.3 The hypothesis states that inefficiently managed firms will
be acquired by more efficiently managed firms. Accordingly,
H1: Inefficient management will lead to an increased likelihood of acquisition.
Explanatory variables suggested by this hypothesis as candidates to be included in the
specifications of predictive models included:
1. ROA (EBIT/Total Assets – Outside Equity Interests)
3 It is also known as the disciplinary motivation for takeovers.
2. ROE (Net Profit After Tax / Shareholders Equity – Outside Equity Interests)
3. Earnings Before Interest and Tax Margin (EBIT/Operating Revenue)
4. EBIT/Shareholders Equity
5. Free Cash Flow (FCF)/Total Assets
6. Dividend/Shareholders Equity
7. Growth in EBIT over past year, along with an activity ratio,
8. Asset Turnover (Net Sales/Total Assets)
While there are competing explanations for the effect that a firm’s undervaluation
has on the likelihood of its acquisition by a bidder, there is consistent agreement
across all explanations that the greater the level of undervaluation then the greater the
likelihood a firm will be acquired. The hypothesis that embodies the impact of these
competing explanations is as follows:
H2: Undervaluation of a firm will lead to an increased likelihood of acquisition.
The explanatory variable suggested by this hypothesis is:
9. Market to book ratio (Market Value of Securities/Net Assets)
The Price Earnings (P/E) ratio is closely linked to the undervaluation and
inefficient management hypotheses. The impact of the P/E ratio on the likehood of
acquisition is referred to as the P/E hypothesis:
H3: A high Price to Earnings Ratio will lead to a decreased likelihood of acquisition.
It follows from this hypothesis that the P/E ratio is a likely candidate as an
explanatory variable for inclusion in models for the prediction of potential takeover
10. Price/Earnings Ratio
The growth resource mismatch hypothesis is the fourth hypothesis. However, the
explanatory variables used in models specified to examine this hypothesis capture
growth and resource availability separately. This gives rise to the following:
H4: Firms which possess low growth / high resource combinations or,
alternatively, high growth / low resource combinations will have an increased
likelihood of acquisition.
The following explanatory variables suggested by this hypothesis are:
11. Growth in Sales (Operating Revenue) over the past year
12. Capital Expenditure/Total Assets
13. Current Ratio (Current Assets/Current Liabilities)
14. (Current Assets – Current Liabilities)/Total Assets
15. Quick Assets (Current Assets – Inventory)/Current Liabilities
The behaviour of some firms to pay out less of their earnings in order to maintain
enough financial slack (retained earnings) to exploit future growth opportunities as
they arise, has led to the dividend payout hypothesis:
H5: High payout ratios will lead to a decreased likelihood of acquisition.
The obvious explanatory variable suggested by this hypothesis is:
16. Dividend Payout Ratio
Rectification of capital structure problems is an obvious motivation for takeovers.
However, there has been some argument as to the impact of low or high leverage on
acquisition likelihood. This paper proposes a hypothesis known as the inefficient
financial structure hypothesis from which the following hypothesis is derived.
H6: High leverage will lead to a decreased likelihood of acquisition.
The explanatory variables suggested by this hypothesis include:
17. Net Gearing (Short Term Debt + Long Term Debt)/Shareholders Equity
18. Net Interest Cover (EBIT/Interest Expense)
19. Total Liabilities/Total Assets
20. Long Term Debt/Total Assets
The existence of Merger and Acquisition (M&A) activity waves, where takeovers
are clustered in wave-like profiles, have been proposed as indicators of changing
levels of M&A activity over time. It has been argued that the identification of M&A
waves, with the corresponding improved likelihood of acquisition when the wave is
surging, captures the effect of the rate of takeover activity at specific points in time,
and serves as valuable input into takeover prediction models. Consistent with M&A
activity waves and their explanation as a motivation for takeovers is the industry
H7: Industry merger and acquisition activity will lead to an increased likelihood
An industry relative ratio of takeover activity is suggested by this hypothesis:
21. The numerator is the total bids launched in a given year, while the
denominator is the average number of bids launched across all the industries in
Size will have an impact on the likelihood of acquisition. It seems plausible that
smaller firms will have a greater likelihood of acquisition due to larger firms
generally having fewer bidding firms with the resources to acquire them. This gives
rise to the following hypothesis:
H8: The size of a firm will be negatively related to the likelihood of acquisition.
Explanatory variables that can be employed to control for size include:
21. Log (Total Assets)
22. Net Assets
4. Data and Method
The data requirements for the variables defined above are derived from the
financial statements and balance sheet date price information for Australian listed
companies. The financial statement information was sourced from the AspectHuntley
data base which includes annual financial statement data for all ASX listed companies
between 1995 and 2006. The database includes industry classifications for all firms
included in the construction of industry relative ratios. Lists of takeover bids and their
respective success were obtained from the Connect4 database. This information
enabled the construction of variables for relative merger activity between industries.
Additionally, stock prices from the relevant balance dates of all companies were
sourced from the AspectHuntley online database, the SIRCA Core Price Data Set and
4.1 The Discrete Choice Modelling Framework
The modelling procedure used is the nominal logit model, made popular in the
bankruptcy prediction literature by Ohlson (1980) and, subsequently, in the takeover
prediction literature by Palepu (1986). Logit models are commonly utilised for
dichotomous state problems. The model is given by equations  to  below.
The logit model was developed to overcome the rigidities of the Linear
Probability Model in the presence of a binary dependent variable. Equations  and
 show the existence of a linear relationship between the log-odds ratio (otherwise
known as the logit Li) and the explanatory variables. However, the relationship
between the probability of the event and acquisition likelihood is non-linear. This
non-linear relationship has a major advantage that is demonstrated in equation .
Equation  measures the change in the probability of the event as a result of a small
increment in the explanatory variables, .
When the probability of the
event is high or low, the incremental impact of a change in an explanatory variable on
the likelihood of the event will be compressed, requiring a large change in the
explanatory variables to change the classification of the observation. If a firm is
clearly classified as a target or non-target, a large change in the explanatory variables
is required to change its classification.
4.2 Sampling Schema
Two samples were used in the model building and evaluation procedure. They
were selected to mimic the problem faced by a practitioner attempting to predict
takeover targets into the future.
The first sample was used to estimate the model and to conduct in-sample
classification. It was referred to as the Estimation Sample. This sample was based on
financial data for the 2001 and 2002 financial years for firms that became takeover
targets, as well as selected non-targets, between January, 2003 and D
Last Update: 2014-02-23
Dear Pak Lim,
Berdasarkan program mengenai laporan harian via Email yang sudah berjalan dan kelengkapan pendukung diatas kapal armada PT BAL, saya ingin melaporkan bahwa ada beberapa fasilitas laptop diatas kapal maupun kantor yang mengalami kerusakan, yaitu di kapal TJA 286, TJA 285, TJA 2812, PEC 249, dan laptop radio, tercatat pembelian laptop tersebut pada tanggal 6/5/2012 dan laporan kerusakan pertama dari TJA 2812 pada tanggal 12/12/2012, TJA 286 Tanggal 31 Desember 2012, Tja 285 Tanggal 3/04/2013 dan PEC 249 pada bulan May 2013 dan sampai sekarang masih belum bisa diperbaiki karena kerusakan pada VGA card yang menyatu dengan mainboardnya, langkah yang sudah diambil untuk mengatasi masalah ini sudah kita bawa ke DATACOM dan pihak DATACOM sendiri sampai sekarang kesulitan untuk mencari sparepart yang sama dengan spesifikasi laptop tersebut karena menurut mereka seri laptop Toshiba L740 sudah tidak diproduksi lagi dan kalaupun ada harga untuk mainboardnya sama dengan harga laptop yang baru.
Demikian pemberitahuan ini saya buat untuk kelancaran operasional PT BAL, Terimakasih atas perhatiannya dan mohon saran dari Bapak.
Last Update: 2013-06-13
Last Update: 2014-10-01
Search human translated sentences
Help rating similar searches: multicollinearity (Indonesian - English) | attractiveness (Indonesian - English) | characteristics (Indonesian - English) | identification (Indonesian - English) | classifications (Indonesian - English)
Users are now asking for help: pambungad na panalangin sa buwan ng wika (Tagalog>English) | compound sentences (English>Italian) | ditz (English>Tagalog) | nakatira sa malayo (Tagalog>English) | o que eu não posso ver não posso sentir (Portuguese>English) | farnéscatalonia (Spanish>English) | rasa lenguh apabila menggerakkan rahangnya (Malay>English) | facoltÃ£Â universitaria (Italian>English) | insalata gentile (Italian>German) | fonction transversale (French>Dutch) | perunatrkkelykselle (Finnish>Slovak) | kasingkahulugan ng pag asa (Tagalog>English) | angern (Maltese>English) | barensweë (Afrikaans>Vietnamese) | godi bolela dinwale (Welsh>English)