Aktar reċentament, din l-aġenzija resqet każ li jisfida l-allegat ksur ta’ privatezza minn kumpanija oħra online.

More recently, this agency brought a case challenging alleged privacy breaches by another online company.

Fil-fatt, dan il-każ direttament jisfida l-kondotta li mminat l-Istrateġija ta’ Privatezza u l-User Agreement li jipproteġi l-privatezza tal-konsumaturi, u li tista’ tnaqqas il-fiduċja tal-konsumatur f’miżuri ta’ privatezza meħudha minn kumpaniji online.

Indeed, this case directly challenged conduct that undermined a Privacy Policy and User Agreement protecting consumers' privacy, and that could erode consumer confidence in privacy measures undertaken by online companies.

ikollhom aċċess għal rivista quddiem qorti tal-ġustizzja jew korp ieħor indipendenti u imparzjali stabbilit bil-liġi għalbiex jisfida l-legalità sostanzjali jew proċedurali tad-deċiżjonijiet, l-atti jew l-omissjonijiet bla ħsara għad-dispożizzjonijiet ta'din id-Direttiva dwar il-parteċipazzjoni tal-pubbliku.

have access to a review procedure before a court of law or another independent and impartial body established by law to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of decisions, acts or omissions subject to the public participation provisions of this Directive.

ikollhom aċċess għal rivista quddiem qorti tal-ġustizzja jew korp ieħor indipendenti u imparzjali stabbilit bil-liġi għalbiex jisfida l-legalità sostanzjali jew proċedurali tad-deċiżjonijiet, l-atti jew l-omissjonijiet bla ħsara għad-disposizzjonijiet ta'din id-Direttiva dwar il-parteċipazzjoni tal-pubbliku.

have access to a review procedure before a court of law or another independent and impartial body established by law to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of decisions, acts or omissions subject to the public participation provisions of this Directive.

ikollhom aċċess għal rivista quddiem qorti tal-ġustizzja jew korp ieħor indipendenti u imparzjali stabbilit bil-liġi għalbiex jisfida l-legalità sostanzjali jew proċedurali tad-deċiżjonijiet, l-atti jew l-omissjonijiet bla ħsara għad-disposizzjonijiet ta’ din id-Direttiva dwar il-parteċipazzjoni tal-pubbliku.

have access to a review procedure before a court of law or another independent and impartial body established by law to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of decisions, acts or omissions subject to the public participation provisions of this Directive.

Xejn f'dan il-Ftehim ma għandu jiġi mifhum bħala li jirrestrinġi jew jisfida d-drittijiet ta' l-amministrazzjonijiet tad-dwana li jissodisfaw lilhom infushom rigward il-verità jew l-eżattezza ta' kull stqarrija, dokument jew dikjarazzjoni ppreżentata għall-għanijiet tal-valutazzjoni tad-dwana. IL-PARTI

Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as restricting or calling into question the rights of customs administrations to satisfy themselves as to the truth or accuracy of any statement, document or declaration presented for customs valuation purposes.

B'danakollu, jekk, wara li jkun mgħarraf jew wara li jkun irċieva kopja tal-fajl tal-każ skond il-proċedura fl-Artikolu 8 (1), Stat Membru jisfida d-deċiżjoni meħuda mill-awtorità kompetenti ta' Stat Membru ieħor, dan jista' jitlob lill-Kummissjoni biex tieħu deċiżjoni skond il-proċedura msemmija fl-Artikolu 10 tad-Direttiva 76/768/KEE.

However, if, after having been informed or after having received a copy of the case file in accordance with the procedure under Article 8 (1), a Member State challenges a decision taken by the competent authority of another Member State, it may ask the Commission to take a decision pursuant to the procedure referred to in Article 10 of Directive 76/768/EEC.

B'danakollu, jekk, wara li jkun mgħarraf jew wara li jkun irċieva kopja tal-fajl tal-każ skond il-proċedura fl-Artikolu 8(1), Stat Membru jisfida d-deċiżjoni meħuda mill-awtorità kompetenti ta'Stat Membru ieħor, dan jista'jitlob lill-Kummissjoni biex tieħu deċiżjoni skond il-proċedura msemmija fl-Artikolu 10 tad-Direttiva 76/768/KEE.

However, if, after having been informed or after having received a copy of the case file in accordance with the procedure under Article 8 (1), a Member State challenges a decision taken by the competent authority of another Member State, it may ask the Commission to take a decision pursuant to the procedure referred to in Article 10 of Directive 76/768/EEC.

il-projbizzjoni li wara li tkun tlestiet ir-riċerka u żvilupp tkun sfidata l-validità tad-drittijiet ta’ proprjetà intellettwali li l-partijiet għandhom fis-suq komuni u li huma relevanti għar-riċerka u żvilupp jew, wara li jiskadi l-ftehim tar-riċerka u żvilupp, il-validità tad-drittijiet għall-proprjetà intellettwali li l-partijiet għandhom fis-suq komuni u li jipproteġu lir-riżultati tar-riċerka u żvilupp, mingħajr preġudizzju għall-possibilità li tipprovdi għax-xoljiment tal-ftehim tar-riċerka u żvilupp fl-eventwalità li wieħed mill-partijiet jisfida l-validità ta’ dawn id-drittijiet ta’ proprjetà intelletwali;

the prohibition to challenge after completion of the research and development the validity of intellectual property rights which the parties hold in the common market and which are relevant to the research and development or, after the expiry of the research and development agreement, the validity of intellectual property rights which the parties hold in the common market and which protect the results of the research and development, without prejudice to the possibilty to provide for termination of the research and development agreement in the event of one of the parties challenging the validity of such intellectual property rights;

(b) il-projbizzjoni li wara li tkun tlestiet ir-riċerka u żvilupp tkun sfidata l-validità tad-drittijiet ta'proprjetà intellettwali li l-partijiet għandhom fis-suq komuni u li huma relevanti għar-riċerka u żvilupp jew, wara li jiskadi l-ftehim tar-riċerka u żvilupp, il-validità tad-drittijiet għall-proprjetà intellettwali li l-partijiet għandhom fis-suq komuni u li jipproteġu lir-riżultati tar-riċerka u żvilupp, mingħajr preġudizzju għall-possibilità li tipprovdi għax-xoljiment tal-ftehim tar-riċerka u żvilupp fl-eventwalità li wieħed mill-partijiet jisfida l-validità ta'dawn id-drittijiet ta'proprjetà intelletwali;

(b) the prohibition to challenge after completion of the research and development the validity of intellectual property rights which the parties hold in the common market and which are relevant to the research and development or, after the expiry of the research and development agreement, the validity of intellectual property rights which the parties hold in the common market and which protect the results of the research and development, without prejudice to the possibilty to provide for termination of the research and development agreement in the event of one of the parties challenging the validity of such intellectual property rights;

L-UE miexja fit-triq it-tajba fit-twassil tal-biċċa l-kbira ta'l-''Impennji ta'Barċellona''. L-HLE tan-NU f'Settembru 2005 se tiffoka fuq kif jista'jitħaffef il-progress lejn il-kisba ta'l-MDGs, speċjalment fl-Afrika. Dan jisfida lill-UE mkabbra biex turi għal darb'oħra l-impenn tagħha li tindirizza l-isfida FfD permezz ta'impennji msaħħa ta'l-UE. Bil-proposti inklużi f'dan id-dokument, il-Kummissjoni bi ħsiebha tagħti bidu għal taħdita bil-ħsieb li jkun stabbilit sett ġdid ta'impennji u biex jintlaħaq ftehim dwar l-impennji tat-tip ''Barċellona II''. Filwaqt li din il-Komunikazzjoni tiffoka fuq l-għodod għal FfD imtejjeb, il-Komunikazzjoni dwar il-Koerenza tal-Politika[14] tipproponi miżuri oħra ta'politika li wieħed jista'jidħol għalihom għall-appoġġ fil-kisba ta'l-MDGs.

The EU is well on track to deliver on most of the “Barcelona commitments”. The UN HLE in September 2005 will focus on how to accelerate progress towards attaining the MDGs, especially in Africa. This challenges the enlarged EU to again demonstrate its commitment to addressing the FfD challenge through reinforced EU commitments. With the proposals included in this document the Commission intends to initiate a discussion with a view to establishing a new set of commitments and to reach an agreement on “Barcelona II”-type commitments. Whereas this Communication focuses on the tools for improved FfD, the Communication on Policy Coherence[14] proposes other policy measures that could be undertaken to support the achievement of the MDGs.

Għarfien ġdid ta'l-Oċeani u l-Ibħra jisfida approċċi tradizzjonali settorjali u limitati ġeografikament u jwassal għal forma aktar integrata ta'tfassil ta'politika bbażata fuq il-prinċipju tas-sussidjarjetà. Żviluppi teknoloġiċi, fosthom avvanzi marbuta mal-monitoraġġ u s-sorveljanza ta'l-ibħra, wasslu biex is-servizzi tad-data jiġu integrati għal livelli li wieħed qatt ma seta'jimmaġinahom fl-imgħoddi. Politiki integrati huma l-aħjar mezz sabiex jinkisbu ekonomiji fil-kobor imsejsa fuq it-teknoloġija. L-infurzar tal-liġi fuq il-baħar jiġi organizzat l-aħjar permezz ta'l-użu koordinat tar-riżorsi skarsi u għalja disponibbli fl-Istati Membri. Dan il-kapitlu jispeċifika f'aktar dettall l-implikazzjonijiet li għandu l-iżvilupp ta'politika marittima integrata, u jistipola xi prinċipji ġenerali għat-tfassil tal-politika marittima. Jissuġġerixxi wkoll it-tip ta'diviżjoni ta'l-attivitajiet li wieħed jista'jimmaġina bejn il-KE u l-Istati Membri fl-implimentazzjoni ta'l-ippjanar spazjali.

A new understanding of the oceans and seas challenges traditional sectoral and geographically limited approaches and advocates a more integrated form of policy making based on the principle of subsidiarity. Technological developments, including advances relating to the monitoring and surveillance of the seas, have made it possible to integrate data services to an extent unheard of in the past. Technology-driven economies of scale are best realised through integrated policies. Law enforcement at sea is best organised through the coordinated use of the scarce and expensive resources available in Member States. This chapter spells out in more detail the implications of developing an integrated maritime policy, and sets out some general principles for maritime policy making. It also suggests the type of division of activity which could be envisaged between the EC and the Member States in the implementation of spatial planning.

Għarfien ġdid ta'l-Oċeani u l-Ibħra jisfida approċċi tradizzjonali settorjali u limitati ġeografikament u jwassal għal forma aktar integrata ta'tfassil ta'politika bbażata fuq il-prinċipju tas-sussidjarjetà. Żviluppi teknoloġiċi, fosthom avvanzi marbuta mal-monitoraġġ u s-sorveljanza ta'l-ibħra, wasslu biex is-servizzi tad-data jiġu integrati għal livelli li wieħed qatt ma seta'jimmaġinahom fl-imgħoddi. Politiki integrati huma l-aħjar mezz sabiex jinkisbu ekonomiji fil-kobor imsejsa fuq it-teknoloġija. L-infurzar tal-liġi fuq il-baħar jiġi organizzat l-aħjar permezz ta'l-użu koordinat tar-riżorsi skarsi u għalja disponibbli fl-Istati Membri. Dan il-kapitlu jispeċifika f'aktar dettall l-implikazzjonijiet li għandu l-iżvilupp ta'politika marittima integrata, u jistipola xi prinċipji ġenerali għat-tfassil tal-politika marittima. Jissuġġerixxi wkoll it-tip ta'diviżjoni ta'l-attivitajiet li wieħed jista'jimmaġina bejn il-KE u l-Istati Membri fl-implimentazzjoni ta'l-ippjanar spazjali.

The sensitivity of the “genuine link” debate in the context of shipping should not prevent progress being made on fisheries. The international community has acknowledged that addressing this problem is a key element in the fight against the widespread practice of Illegal, Unregulated and Unreported Fishing (IUU) [120]. The Community is supporting developing countries and regions to combat IUU by funding action both under fisheries agreements and under the Cotonou Agreement []. This support needs to be continued.Important work has been done on this by the High Seas Task Force in Paris []. The Commission will continue to support this work, and offers to support the installation of the Monitoring, Control and Surveillance Network for fisheries related activities in the new Community Fisheries Control Agency []. In that context tracking of activities and vessel identification systems would be globally strengthened. The coverage of Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs) could be extended, both geographically and by species, to eliminate unregulated fisheries.