Ask Google

Results for effectively translation from English to Hindi

Human contributions

From professional translators, enterprises, web pages and freely available translation repositories.

Add a translation

English

Hindi

Info

English

effectively

Hindi

प्रभावी रूप से

Last Update: 2014-03-29
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

English

You will be presented with a dialog showing small tips to help you use this program more effectively.

Hindi

@ info: status

Last Update: 2011-10-23
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

English

A three-person commission will be set up to ensure the state is delivering services as effectively and efficiently as possible.

Hindi

राज्य द्वारा यथासंभव प्रभावी और कुशल तरीके से सेवा प्रदान किया जाना सुनिश्चित करने के लिए तीन सदस्यों के आयोग का गठन किया जाएगा।

Last Update: 2014-10-20
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

English

Now as both the causes of the all the evil are effectively contained in jail cells, so a sun of eternal lasting peace is supposed to rise in the horizon today.

Hindi

तो अब चूंकि दोनों ही मुख्य बुराइयाँ (पार्टियों के नेता) अब जेल में हैं तो अब क्षितिज में दैवीय चिर शान्ति का सूर्य उदित हो जाना चाहिए.

Last Update: 2016-02-24
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

English

The Southern state of Tamil Nadu, which is the first state in the world to effectively harness and use the film medium for political purposes right from the 1940s.

Hindi

यह विश्व का पहला ऐसा राज्य है जिसने फिल्मों का राजनीतिक उद्देश्यों के लिये दोहन 40 के दशक से ही प्रारंभ कर दिया था।

Last Update: 2016-02-24
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

English

"Small and medium sized companies often lack the experience, personnel and financial resources to protect corporate secrets effectively against unauthorised access," the BfV warns in a report.

Hindi

"छोटे और मध्यम आकार कंपनिया अक्सर अनुभव के अभाव, कर्मियों और वित्तीय संसाधनों अनधिकृत पहुँच के खिलाफ प्रभावी ढंग से कॉर्पोरेट रहस्य की रक्षा करने के लिए," BfV एक रिपोर्ट में चेतावनी देती हैं।

Last Update: 2014-10-20
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous
Warning: Contains invisible HTML formatting

English

Intelligence is understood as the ability to acquire knowledge, to think and give reason effectively and to deal adaptively with the environment. This mental capacity helps him in the task of theoretical as well as practical manipulation of things, objects or events present in his environment in order to adapt or face new challenges and problems in life as successfully as possible. Intelligence derives from ability to learn and utilize what has been learned in adjusting to new situations and so

Hindi

बुद्धिमत्ता को ज्ञान प्राप्त करने, सोचने और प्रभावी ढंग से तर्क देने और पर्यावरण के साथ अनुकूल व्यवहार करने की क्षमता के रूप में समझा जाता है। यह मानसिक क्षमता उसे सैद्धांतिक और साथ ही साथ अपने वातावरण में मौजूद चीजों, वस्तुओं या घटनाओं के व्यावहारिक हेरफेर में मदद करती है ताकि जीवन में आने वाली नई चुनौतियों और समस्याओं का सफलतापूर्वक सामना कर सकें। बुद्धिमत्ता सीखने और नई स्थितियों के समायोजन में जो सीखा गया है, उसका उपयोग करने की क्षमता प्राप्त होती है

Last Update: 2019-09-26
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

English

Introduction to Program Evaluation -Whole Document- Dr. Suvedi, MSU/AEE- David C. Crawford - Back to Table of Contents Observation Schedule An observation schedule is typically a checklist or rating scale where the occurrences of particular, pre-identified events or features can be noted. This method is useful to gather information about particular physical behaviors. It provides an opportunity to collect information directly about what is actually occurring within the natural settings. It yields very objective information. The more structured the schedule, the easier to summarize and analyze data. This method has some limitations when one needs to gather information about people. The evaluator has less control over the situation in a natural environment. If the group is aware of being observed, behavior may be affected-- which is known as "Hawthorne effect." Different observers may not record events consistently. If the evaluator chooses to be involved in the activity, he or she may lose objectivity. Back to Table of Contents Case Study It can provide in depth information on a single unit, group or organization-- through personal discussion, mutual interaction, observation, or review of existing documents. The evaluator captures the total scene of the situation. Yin (1984) describes case studies as either explanatory, descriptive, or exploratory. With an explanatory purpose, a case study is designed to test and explain causal links in real-life programs whose complexity cannot be captured by a survey. For descriptive purposes, a case study can be used to describe the real-life context where a program takes place. Finally, a case study can be exploratory-- if a program has no clear set of outcomes, it can help identify performance measures or pose hypotheses for further evaluative work. Case study has several advantages. It allows depth of insight into relationships and personal feelings; the information can be effectively used in combination with other methods such as survey and observation; and it can be tailored to a specific situation. The major disadvantage of case study is the subjectivity of information. People sometime question on the evaluator's bias. In addition, it is time consuming. It requires extensive amounts of data. The findings cannot necessarily be generalized to a larger community as it focuses on a limited number of cases. Back to Table of Contents Key Informants It is based on obtaining information, over time, from a community resident who is in a position to know a community well. Key informants in a community may include school superintendents, Extension educators, local leaders, Church officials, local business leaders, and members of service clubs such as Lions, Kiwanis, or Optimist International. These people could provide fairly representative information on how a program or project is serving its intended beneficiaries. The evaluator should, however, recognize the limitations of this approach that it does not use random selection of subjects and thus, is subject to information bias and representativeness. Back to Table of Contents Surveys Surveys have become very popular methods of collecting evaluative data. Surveys are used to measure people's opinion, attitudes, beliefs, behaviors, reactions, and attributes in response to specific questions. It can provide the distribution of some characteristics in a population and can usually accomplish that through surveying only a portion of the people (or units) in that population. Some qualitative methods such as focus group interviews, in-depth case studies, and ethnography cannot do the job which surveys can do. Surveys have several advantages. They are moderate in cost and relatively easy to reach large numbers. They allow for anonymity of responses. Evaluators could also ask fairly complex questions about respondents attitude and behaviors. Data can be requested from records and other sources. Surveys allow time for respondents to reflect on events and report subsequent changes and feelings. The usefulness of survey data can be enhanced if the information is combined with other methods, i.

Hindi

अनुवाद

Last Update: 2017-06-03
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous
Warning: Contains invisible HTML formatting

English

Introduction The Taliban is a predominantly Pashtun, Islamic fundamentalist group that ruled Afghanistan from 1996 until 2001, when a U.S.-led invasion toppled the regime for providing refuge to al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden. The Taliban regrouped across the border in Pakistan, where its central leadership, headed by Mullah Mohammed Omar, leads an insurgency against the Western-backed government in Kabul. Both the United States and Afghanistan have pursued a negotiated settlement with the Taliban, but talks have little momentum as international forces prepare to conclude combat operations in December 2014 and withdraw by the end of 2016. Rise of the Taliban The Taliban was formed in the early 1990s by an Afghan faction of mujahideen, Islamic fighters who had resisted the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan (1979–89) with the covert backing of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency and its Pakistani counterpart, the Inter-Services Intelligence directorate (ISI). They were joined by younger Pashtun tribesmen who studied in Pakistani madrassas, or seminaries; taliban is Pashto for "students." Pashtuns comprise a plurality in Afghanistan and are the predominant ethnic group in much of the country's south and east. Taliban militiamen chant slogans as they drive toward the front line near Kabul in November 1997. (Photo: Courtesy Reuters) The movement attracted popular support in the initial post-Soviet era by promising to impose stability and rule of law after four years of conflict (1992–1996) among rival mujahideen groups. Talibs entered Kandahar in November 1994 to pacify the crime-ridden southern city, and by September 1996 seized the capital, Kabul, from President Burhanuddin Rabbani, an ethnic Tajik whom they viewed as anti-Pashtun and corrupt. The Taliban regime controlled some 90 percent of the country before its 2001 overthrow, analysts say. The Taliban imposed its brand of justice as it consolidated territorial control. Taliban jurisprudence was drawn from the Pashtuns' pre-Islamic tribal code and interpretations of sharia colored by the austere Wahhabi doctrines of the madrassas' Saudi benefactors. The regime neglected social services and other basic state functions even as its Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice enforced prohibitions on behavior the Taliban deemed un-Islamic, requiring women to wear the head-to-toe burqa, or chadri; banning music and television; and jailing men whose beards it deemed too short. The regime was internationally isolated from its inception. Two UN Security Council resolutions passed in 1998 urged the Taliban to end its abusive treatment of women. The following year the council imposed sanctions on the regime for harboring al-Qaeda. Only Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Pakistan recognized the government. Many analysts say Islamabad supported the Taliban as a force that could unify and stabilize Afghanistan while staving off Indian, Iranian, and Russian influence. Courtesy Congressional Research Service Leadership and Support Mullah Omar, a cleric and veteran of the anti-Soviet resistance, led Taliban-ruled Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001 as amir al-mu'minin, or "commander of the faithful." He granted al-Qaeda sanctuary on the condition that it not antagonize the United States, but bin Laden reneged on their agreement in 1998 when he orchestrated bombings of U.S. embassies in East Africa. The episode was indicative of tensions that emerged between the two groups, analysts say. The Taliban was fundamentally parochial while al-Qaeda had its sights set on global jihad—yet after 9/11, Omar rejected U.S. demands that he give up bin Laden. Ethnic minority Tajiks, Uzbeks, and Hazaras in northern Afghanistan opposed to Taliban rule formed the Northern Alliance, which assisted U.S.-led forces in routing the Taliban after 9/11. Though the regime was dismantled during the occupation, Mullah Omar and many of his top aides escaped to the frontier territories of Pakistan, where they reconstituted the Taliban's central leadership. Dubbed the "Quetta Shura" for the capital of Balochistan province, where they are believed to have taken refuge, they maintain a degree of operational authority over Afghan Taliban fighters, but appear "unwilling or unable to monopolize anti-state violence," a UN Security Council monitoring team found in September 2013. Many experts suspect the Pakistani security establishment continues to provide Taliban militants sanctuary in the country's western tribal areas in an effort to counter India's influence in Afghanistan. Islamabad dismisses these charges. (Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, commonly known as the Pakistani Taliban, is an insurgent group distinct from its Afghan namesake; it coalesced in response to the Pakistani military's incursions into that country's tribal areas. The Afghan Taliban, by contrast, views Pakistan as a benefactor.) The Taliban's post-2001 resurgence has partially been financed by narcotics production and trafficking, though Mullah Omar issued injunctions against opium production, and the Taliban eradicated much of the poppy crop during its rule. Insurgents and other strongmen extort ushr, an agricultural tithe, from farmers and levies at roadside checkpoints. Revenues from illicit mining [PDF] also contribute to Taliban coffers, which net some $400 million [PDF] a year, the UN estimated in 2012. Public Opinion of the Taliban More than a decade since its fall from power, the Taliban enjoys continued, if declining, support. The Asia Foundation found that in 2013, a third of Afghans—mostly Pashtuns and rural Afghans—had sympathy for armed opposition groups (AOGs), primarily the Taliban. Nearly two-thirds of Afghans, the survey found, believed that reconciliation between the government and AOGs would stabilize the country. Afghan support for the Taliban and allied groups stems in part from grievances directed at public institutions. While the Asia Foundation survey found the Afghan National Army and Afghan National Police garner high public confidence, many civilians see government institutions such as the militia-like Afghan Local Police as predatory. Likewise, international forces' support for warlords and strongmen, an expedient in securing territory, likely also alienated many rural Afghans from Kabul, analysts say. Many rural Afghans have come to trust the Taliban's extensive judicial network over government courts to "solve disputes in a fair war, without tribal or ethnic bias, or more commonly, without having to pay bribes," says Graeme Smith, a Kabul-based senior analyst at the International Crisis Group. A Resilient Insurgency As the Obama administration wound down the war in Iraq, it recommitted the United States to counterinsurgency operations against the Taliban and allied groups in Afghanistan, authorizing a surge that brought peak troop levels to about one hundred thousand in June 2011 and redoubled civilian efforts. Pakistani safe havens stymied U.S. counterinsurgency efforts, though the CIA's targeted-killing program there has sought, in part, to fulfill a "force protection" mission where the U.S. military cannot operate. But as the Pentagon withdrew the surge troops in 2012, further drew down its military footprint in 2013, and handed lead security authority over to Afghan forces in June of that year, the Taliban-led insurgency escalated. The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) documented 8,615 civilian deaths and injuries [PDF] in 2013, a 14 percent increase over the previous year and the highest toll since it began keeping these records in 2009. UNAMA attributed the vast majority of these casualties to insurgents who deliberately targeted civilians or used such indiscriminate tactics as improvised explosive devices; other civilians were caught in the crossfire between insurgents and government forces. In some outlying districts, Afghan forces and local insurgents have reached informal ceasefires that effectively cede a degree of authority to the Taliban. The UN reported in 2014 that the Taliban maintained outright control of four districts, out of 373 nationwide, but the insurgency's reach extends much further: Afghan security forces judged in late 2013 that some 40 percent of districts had a "raised" or "high" threat level. An Elusive Endgame in Afghanistan Afghan forces have taken over nearly all combat operations, but some military analysts question whether they can keep the insurgency at bay as coalition forces draw down. Though NATO's combat mission expires at the end of 2014, a consultative loya jirga, a traditional grand assembly of tribal elders and community leaders, overwhelmingly endorsed a longer-term role for the U.S. military and its partners in helping secure the country. That role is likely to be narrowly circumscribed, however. The United States has articulated a post-2014 mission focused exclusively on training Afghan forces and conducting counterterrorism operations against "the remnants of al-Qaeda." In May 2014, President Barack Obama announced a timetable calling for a complete U.S. withdrawal by the end of 2016. (This residual force is contingent on the Afghan government concluding agreements [PDF] with the U.S. government and NATO; both candidates vying for the presidency have promised they would sign them.) Some Afghans and U.S. military analysts see the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq in late 2011, which followed Washington and Baghdad's failure to agree on a renewed status-of-forces agreement, as a cautionary tale. After the last U.S. troops departed Iraq, Sunni insurgents unleashed levels of violence not seen since the height of the civil war several years prior, and made territorial gains across large swathes of the country. Meanwhile, as an outright battlefield victory appeared unattainable, the United States came to believe by 2010 that political reconciliation "is the solution to ending the war" [PDF]. But talks between the Taliban and the central government have suffered repeated setbacks. Most notably, in September 2011, Kabul's chief negotiator, former president Rabbani, was assassinated. The Taliban has so far shown little interest in accepting the constitution and laying down its arms, while some civil society groups also oppose a negotiated settlement, fearing a backslide on women's rights and other gains made in the past decade. U.S.-Taliban talks have not fared better than those carried out by Kabul. Prospective negotiations mediated by Qatar in July 2013 were quickly scuttled after Afghan president Hamid Karzai objected to the manner in which the Taliban opened its office in Doha. The Obama administration had originally explored the prisoner swap of U.S. Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl for five Taliban officials as a potential confidence-building measure tethered to broader peace talks, but no such deal was in the works by the time the exchange went through in June 2014; it appears to have taken place as a one-off event. Some of the White House's detractors contend that the surge's rigid timetable undermined U.S. leverage at a moment when maximum military pressure was brought to bear on the insurgency, and that the anticipated withdrawal has likewise diminished the Taliban's incentives to negotiate. As coalition forces draw down, the Taliban has recast its mission from one resisting foreign occupation to one that is confronting a government it considers a Western pawn. Meanwhile, its battlefield position and financial interests further reduce its incentives to negotiate, analysts say. The UN says the Taliban and Afghan forces are at a "military stalemate." Other analyses are less optimistic about the central government's ability to hold its ground. The International Crisis Group reports that insurgents are increasingly confident as "ongoing withdrawals of international soldiers have generally coincided with a deterioration of Kabul's reach in outlying districts." An independent assessment[PDF] of Afghan security forces commissioned by the Pentagon predicts that the Taliban will pick up the tempo of its operations and expand areas under its control between 2015 and 2018. Meanwhile, strong revenues from a bumper poppy harvest [PDF] in 2013 and other illicit trade have further reduced the Taliban's incentives to reach a negotiated settlement. Some Taliban factions have become less an ideology-driven armed opposition group than a profit-driven mafia, according to the UN. But while the insurgency remained formidable, the Taliban failed at one of its chief strategic objectives of 2014: mass disruption of Afghanistan's provincial and presidential elections.

Hindi

الأردية مترجم جوجل إلى الإنكليزية

Last Update: 2017-01-08
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous
Warning: Contains invisible HTML formatting

English

robots offer specific benefits to workers indindustries and countries. If introduced correctly industrial robots can improve the quality of life by freeing workers from dirty boring dangerous and heavy labour. it is true that robots can cause unemployment by replacing human workers but robots also create jobs robot technicians salesmen engineers programmers and supervisors. The benefits of robots to industry include improved management control and productivity and consistently high quality products. industrial robots can work tirelessly night and Day on an assembly line without an loss in performance. consequently they can greatly reduce the costs of manufactured goods. as a result of these industrial benefits, countries that effectively use robots in their industries will have an economic advantage on world market.

Hindi

QUERY LENGTH LIMIT EXCEDEED. MAX ALLOWED QUERY : 500 CHARS

Last Update: 2016-11-14
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

English

Human Resources (HR) is a term used to describe the individuals who make up the workforce of an organization. Human Resources (HR) or Human Resource Management (HRM) is a professional discipline that deals with a strategic and comprehensive approach to managing people who work in an organization. HRM takes care of the organization’s man power and make it effectively and productively for the accomplishment of the organization’s goals and objectives.

Hindi

मानव संसाधन (एचआर) एक शब्द व्यक्तियों, जो एक संगठन के कार्यबल को बनाने का वर्णन करने के लिए प्रयोग किया जाता है। मानव संसाधन (एचआर) या मानव संसाधन प्रबंधन (HRM) एक पेशेवर अनुशासन है कि एक संगठन में कार्य करने वाले लोगों के प्रबंधन के लिए एक रणनीतिक और व्यापक दृष्टिकोण के साथ संबंधित है। मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्री संगठन के आदमी की शक्ति का ख्याल और उसे संगठन के लक्ष्यों और उद्देश्यों की सिद्धि के लिए प्रभावी ढंग से और उत्पादकता बनाना।

Last Update: 2016-09-07
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

English

You would be impressed to know about all the features 475 DI comes loaded with & how all these features have translated into benefits especially in our type of work. My primary application with the tractor is cultivation of Soyabean and Wheat. In my application, the point that impressed me the most was the excellent pulling ability of 475DI. This enabled me to use a bigger cultivator than the competition tractors effectively in my field. The optimum weight of the tractor ensures the implement stays on ground through out the operation & the high precision hydraulics' maintained the desired position thus giving a uniform depth of cut across the entire field. This also makes my work faster as compared to other competition tractors thanks to the better torque options that ensure more coverage in lesser time. Due to the excellent torque there is least RPM drop even while turning & I was able to turn the tractor easily. Lastly something that keeps me assured always is the new 1+1+1 warranty coupled with the widest service network of Mahindra that ensures my tractor is in the best running conditions at all times. The best in class interval between services of 350 hours also gives me minimum visits to the workshop as well as excellent savings on maintenance cost. I don’t see any reason why 475 DI shouldn’t be your choice. Do remember, it not only does what you want it to do, but also does it better than the others with the least expenses.

Hindi

सार्थक

Last Update: 2015-10-06
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous
Warning: Contains invisible HTML formatting

English

According to The Star newspaper, the new bill will effectively hand the government "a stranglehold over the media," while The Standard said democracy and free speech in Kenya had been "dealt a major blow" and lambasted the bill as "draconian."

Hindi

दि स्टार समाचार-पत्र के अनुसार, नया विधेयक सरकार को "मीडिया पर सख्त नियंत्रण" प्रदान करेगा, जबकि दि स्टैन्डर्ड ने कहा कि केन्या में लोकतंत्र तथा बोलने की स्वतंत्रता "को तगड़ा झटका लगा" है तथा इस विधेयक को क्रूर बताया है।

Last Update: 2014-10-20
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous
Warning: Contains invisible HTML formatting

English

Even in Germany, the Eurosceptic Alternative for Germany Party - founded only this year - came from nowhere to grab nearly five million votes in September's federal elections, thus effectively knocking the Free Democrats (equivalent to our own Lib Dems) out of the Bundestag.

Hindi

यहां तक कि जर्मनी में भी यूरोस्केप्टिल अल्टरनेटिव फॉर जर्मनी पार्टी ने - जिसकी स्थापना इस वर्ष ही हुई है - अचानक आकर सितम्बर के संघीय चुनाव में लगभग पचास लाख वोट प्राप्त किए, और इस प्रकार फ्री डेमोक्रेट्स (हमारे अपने लिब डेम्स के समतुल्य) को प्रभावी रूप से बुन्डेसटैग से बाहर किया।

Last Update: 2014-10-20
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

Get a better translation with
4,401,923,520 human contributions

Users are now asking for help:



We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more. OK