Ask Google

Results for member translation from Indonesian to English

Human contributions

From professional translators, enterprises, web pages and freely available translation repositories.

Add a translation

Indonesian

English

Info

Indonesian

: nama mask member tidak valid

English

: invalid membar mask name

Last Update: 2014-08-15
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Indonesian

implementasi upload sweep out dana member mds

English

Indonesian translation to english

Last Update: 2013-05-12
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

Indonesian

Pesan METHOD_CALL: ruas header PATH atau MEMBER hilang

English

METHOD_CALL message: PATH or MEMBER header field is missing

Last Update: 2014-08-15
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

Indonesian

Pesan SIGNAL: ruas header PATH, INTERFACE, atau MEMBER hilang

English

SIGNAL message: PATH, INTERFACE or MEMBER header field is missing

Last Update: 2014-08-15
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

Indonesian

anggota member tidak boleh memiliki tipe variabel termodifikasi %qT

English

data member may not have variably modified type %qT

Last Update: 2014-08-15
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

Indonesian

Di beberapa kota seperti Ambon, Kupang, Soe dan khususnya Ende sebagai kota dengan member Komunitas Blogger NTT terbanyak kemudian mencetuskan aksi-aksi solidaritasnya.

English

In cities like Ambon, Kupang, Soe and especially Ende where most of the Flobamora's community members are based, solidarity actions began.

Last Update: 2016-02-24
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

Indonesian

Nama : Septiana anis nur cahyanti Nama panggilan : Nandha , Anis , dan Septiana Ttl : Klaten , 10 September 1999 Hobi : menyanyi , dance , bermain music , dan jalan jalan Saya mempunyai 3 saudara dan saya adalah anak terakhir ,saya mempunyai kehidupan yang sederhana . Namun , kesederhanaan itu tidak membatasi impian saya . Berkat dukungan dari keluaga saya dapat berdiri tegak disini untuk menggapai impian saya . Meski pun tidak ada sosok ayah yang berada di samping saya . Selama ini sosok ibulah yang menemani perjalanan hidup saya yang senantiasa menemani saya disaat saya senang mau pun sedih . Pernah saya berrfikir untuk meninggalkan kehidupan saya , tapi setelah saya fikir fikir kehidupan saya masih panjang dan saya belum membahagiakan ibu saya . Dimata saya ibulah yang terbaik . Kana tidak ada sosok yang bias menggantikan ibu . Karna apa ? ibulah yang member kasih saying yang tidak ada batasnya . Karna ibu saya lahir didunia ini dan berkat ibu juga saya tabah menjalani hidup saya yang penuh liku liku . google translet indonesia ke inggris

English

QUERY LENGTH LIMIT EXCEDEED. MAX ALLOWED QUERY : 500 CHARS

Last Update: 2015-08-25
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

Indonesian

10 easy ways to fail a Ph.D. [article index] [email me] [@mattmight] [+mattmight] [rss] The attrition rate in Ph.D. school is high. Anywhere from a third to half will fail. In fact, there's a disturbing consistency to grad school failure. I'm supervising a lot of new grad students this semester, so for their sake, I'm cataloging the common reasons for failure. Read on for the top ten reasons students fail out of Ph.D. school. Focus on grades or coursework No one cares about grades in grad school. There's a simple formula for the optimal GPA in grad school: Optimal GPA = Minimum Required GPA + ε Anything higher implies time that could have been spent on research was wasted on classes. Advisors might even raise an eyebrow at a 4.0 During the first two years, students need to find an advisor, pick a research area, read a lot of papers and try small, exploratory research projects. Spending too much time on coursework distracts from these objectives. Learn too much Some students go to Ph.D. school because they want to learn. Let there be no mistake: Ph.D. school involves a lot of learning. But, it requires focused learning directed toward an eventual thesis. Taking (or sitting in on) non-required classes outside one's focus is almost always a waste of time, and it's always unnecessary. By the end of the third year, a typical Ph.D. student needs to have read about 50 to 150 papers to defend the novelty of a proposed thesis. Of course, some students go too far with the related work search, reading so much about their intended area of research that they never start that research. Advisors will lose patience with "eternal" students that aren't focused on the goal--making a small but significant contribution to human knowledge. In the interest of personal disclosure, I suffered from the "want to learn everything" bug when I got to Ph.D. school. I took classes all over campus for my first two years: Arabic, linguistics, economics, physics, math and even philosophy. In computer science, I took lots of classes in areas that had nothing to do with my research. The price of all this "enlightenment" was an extra year on my Ph.D. I only got away with this detour because while I was doing all that, I was a TA, which meant I wasn't wasting my advisor's grant funding. Expect perfection Perfectionism is a tragic affliction in academia, since it tends to hit the brightest the hardest. Perfection cannot be attained. It is approached in the limit. Students that polish a research paper well past the point of diminishing returns, expecting to hit perfection, will never stop polishing. Students that can't begin to write until they have the perfect structure of the paper mapped out will never get started. For students with problems starting on a paper or dissertation, my advice is that writing a paper should be an iterative process: start with an outline and some rough notes; take a pass over the paper and improve it a little; rinse; repeat. When the paper changes little with each pass, it's at diminishing returns. One or two more passes over the paper are all it needs at that point. "Good enough" is better than "perfect." Procrastinate Chronic perfectionists also tend to be procrastinators. So do eternal students with a drive to learn instead of research. Ph.D. school seems to be a magnet for every kind of procrastinator. Unfortunately, it is also a sieve that weeds out the unproductive. Procrastinators should check out my tips for boosting productivity. Go rogue too soon/too late The advisor-advisee dynamic needs to shift over the course of a degree. Early on, the advisor should be hands on, doling out specific topics and helping to craft early papers. Toward the end, the student should know more than the advisor about her topic. Once the inversion happens, she needs to "go rogue" and start choosing the topics to investigate and initiating the paper write-ups. She needs to do so even if her advisor is insisting she do something else. The trick is getting the timing right. Going rogue before the student knows how to choose good topics and write well will end in wasted paper submissions and a grumpy advisor. On the other hand, continuing to act only when ordered to act past a certain point will strain an advisor that expects to start seeing a "return" on an investment of time and hard-won grant money. Advisors expect near-terminal Ph.D. students to be proto-professors with intimate knowledge of the challenges in their field. They should be capable of selecting and attacking research problems of appropriate size and scope. Treat Ph.D. school like school or work Ph.D. school is neither school nor work. Ph.D. school is a monastic experience. And, a jealous hobby. Solving problems and writing up papers well enough to pass peer review demands contemplative labor on days, nights and weekends. Reading through all of the related work takes biblical levels of devotion. Ph.D. school even comes with built-in vows of poverty and obedience. The end brings an ecclesiastical robe and a clerical hood. Students that treat Ph.D. school like a 9-5 endeavor are the ones that take 7+ years to finish, or end up ABD. Ignore the committee Some Ph.D. students forget that a committee has to sign off on their Ph.D. It's important for students to maintain contact with committee members in the latter years of a Ph.D. They need to know what a student is doing. It's also easy to forget advice from a committee member since they're not an everyday presence like an advisor. Committee members, however, rarely forget the advice they give. It doesn't usually happen, but I've seen a shouting match between a committee member and a defender where they disagreed over the metrics used for evaluation of an experiment. This committee member warned the student at his proposal about his choice of metrics. He ignored that warning. He was lucky: it added only one more semester to his Ph.D. Another student I knew in grad school was told not to defend, based on the draft of his dissertation. He overruled his committee's advice, and failed his defense. He was told to scrap his entire dissertaton and start over. It took him over ten years to finish his Ph.D. Aim too low Some students look at the weakest student to get a Ph.D. in their department and aim for that. This attitude guarantees that no professorship will be waiting for them. And, it all but promises failure. The weakest Ph.D. to escape was probably repeatedly unlucky with research topics, and had to settle for a contingency plan. Aiming low leaves no room for uncertainty. And, research is always uncertain. Aim too high A Ph.D. seems like a major undertaking from the perspective of the student. It is. But, it is not the final undertaking. It's the start of a scientific career. A Ph.D. does not have to cure cancer or enable cold fusion. At best a handful of chemists remember what Einstein's Ph.D. was in. Einstein's Ph.D. dissertation was a principled calculation meant to estimate Avogadro's number. He got it wrong. By a factor of 3. He still got a Ph.D. A Ph.D. is a small but significant contribution to human knowledge. Impact is something students should aim for over a lifetime of research. Making a big impact with a Ph.D. is about as likely as hitting a bullseye the very first time you've fired a gun. Once you know how to shoot, you can keep shooting until you hit it. Plus, with a Ph.D., you get a lifetime supply of ammo. Some advisors can give you a list of potential research topics. If they can, pick the topic that's easiest to do but which still retains your interest. It does not matter at all what you get your Ph.D. in. All that matters is that you get one. It's the training that counts--not the topic. Miss the real milestones Most schools require coursework, qualifiers, thesis proposal, thesis defense and dissertation. These are the requirements on paper. In practice, the real milestones are three good publications connected by a (perhaps loosely) unified theme. Coursework and qualifiers are meant to undo admissions mistakes. A student that has published by the time she takes her qualifiers is not a mistake. Once a student has two good publications, if she convinces her committee that she can extrapolate a third, she has a thesis proposal. Once a student has three publications, she has defended, with reasonable confidence, that she can repeatedly conduct research of sufficient quality to meet the standards of peer review. If she draws a unifying theme, she has a thesis, and if she staples her publications together, she has a dissertation. I fantasize about buying an industrial-grade stapler capable of punching through three journal papers and calling it The Dissertator. Of course, three publications is nowhere near enough to get a professorship--even at a crappy school. But, it's about enough to get a Ph.D. Related posts • Recommended reading for grad students. • The illustrated guide to a Ph.D. • How to get into grad school. • Advice for thesis proposals. • Productivity tips for academics. • Academic job hunt advice. • Successful Ph.D. students: Perseverance, tenacity and cogency. • The CRAPL: An open source license for academics. 3 qualities of successful Ph.D. students: Perseverance, tenacity and cogency [article index] [email me] [@mattmight] [+mattmight] [rss] Every fall, a fresh crop of Ph.D. students arrives. Since I'm actively looking for Ph.D. students, I get the same question a dozen times every year: "How long does it take to get a Ph.D.?" This isn't the right question. "Ph.D. school takes as long as you want it to," I tell them. There's no speed limit on how fast you can jump through all the hoops. A better question to ask is, "What makes a Ph.D. student successful?" Having watched Ph.D. students succeed and fail at four universities, I infer that success in graduate school hinges on three qualities: perseverance, tenacity and cogency. If you're in Ph.D. school or you're thinking about it, read on. What doesn't matter There's a ruinous misconception that a Ph.D. must be smart. This can't be true. A smart person would know better than to get a Ph.D. "Smart" qualities like brilliance and quick-thinking are irrelevant in Ph.D. school. Students that have made it through so far on brilliance and quick-thinking alone wash out of Ph.D. programs with nagging predictability. Let there be no doubt: brilliance and quick-thinking are valuable in other pursuits. But, they're neither sufficient nor necessary in science. Certainly, being smart helps. But, it won't get the job done. Moreover, as anyone going through Ph.D. school can tell you: people of less than first-class intelligence make it across the finish line and leave, Ph.D. in hand. As my advisor used to tell me, "Whenever I felt depressed in grad school--when I worried I wasn't going to finish my Ph.D.--I looked at the people dumber than me finishing theirs, and I would think to myself, if that idiot can get a Ph.D., dammit, so can I." Since becoming a professor, I finding myself repeating a corollary of this observation, but I replace "getting a Ph.D." with "obtaining grant funding." Update: Within a month of writing that last line, I was awarded my first three grants. Perseverance To escape with a Ph.D., you must meaningfully extend the boundary of human knowledge. More exactly, you must convince a panel of experts guarding the boundary that you have done so. You can take classes and read papers to figure out where the boundary lies. That's easy. But, when it comes time to actually extend that boundary, you have to get into your bunker and prepare for the onslaught of failure. A lot of Ph.D. students get depressed when they reach the boundary, because there's no longer a test to cram for or a procedure to follow. This is the point (2-3 years in) where attrition peaks. Finding a problem to solve is rarely a problem itself. Every field is brimming with open problems. If finding a problem is hard, you're in the wrong field. The real hard part, of course, is solving an open problem. After all, if someone could tell you how to solve it, it wouldn't be open. To survive this period, you have to be willing to fail from the moment you wake to the moment your head hits the pillow. You must be willing to fail for days on end, for months on end and maybe even for years on end. The skill you accrete during this trauma is the ability to imagine plausible solutions, and to estimate the likelihood that an approach will work. If you persevere to the end of this phase, your mind will intuit solutions to problems in ways that it didn't and couldn't before. You won't know how your mind does this. (I don't know how mine does it.) It just will. As you acquire this skill, you'll be launching fledgling papers at peer reviewers, checking to see if others think what you're doing qualifies as research yet. Since acceptance rates at good venues range between 8% and 25%, most or all of your papers will be rejected. You just have to hope that you'll eventually figure out how to get your work published. If you stick with it long enough and work at it hard enough, you will. For students that excelled as undergraduates, the sudden and constant barrage of rejection and failure is jarring. If you have an ego problem, Ph.D. school will fix it. With a vengeance. (Some egos seem to recover afterward.) This phase of the Ph.D. demands perseverance--in the face of uncertainty, in the face of rejection and in the face of frustration. Tenacity To get a tenure-track professorship after Ph.D. school, you need an additional quality: tenacity. Since there are few tenure-track faculty positions available, there is a fierce (yet civil) competition to get them. In computer science, a competitive faculty candidate will have about 10 publications, and 3-5 of those will be at "selective" or "Tier 1" venues (crudely, less than 33% acceptance rate). A Ph.D. by itself won't even get you a job interview anymore. There are few good reasons to get a Ph.D. "Because you want to become a professor" might be the only good one. Ironically, there's a good chance you won't realize that you want to be a professor until the end of grad school. So, if you're going to do Ph.D. school at all, do it right, for your own sake. To become professor, you can't have just one discovery or solve just one open problem. You have to solve several, and get each solution published. As you exit graduate school, an arc connecting your results should emerge, proving to faculties that your research has a profitable path forward. You will also need to actively, even aggressively, forge relationships with scholars in your field. Researchers in your field need to know who you are and what you're doing. They need to be interested in what you're doing too. None of that is going to happen by itself. Cogency Finally, a good Ph.D. student must have the ability to clearly and forcefully articulate their ideas--in person and in writing. Science is as much an act of persuasion as it is an act of discovery. Once you've made a discovery, you have to persuade experts that you've made a legitimate, meaningful contribution. This is harder to do than it seems. Simply showing experts "the data" isn't going to work. (Yes, in a perfect world, this would be sufficient.) Instead, you have to spoon-feed the experts. As you write, you have to consciously minimize the amount of time and cognitive pain it takes for them to realize you've made a discovery. You may have to go "on tour" and give engaging presentations to get people excited about your research. When you give conference talks, you want them eagerly awaiting the next episode. You will have to write compelling abstracts and introductions that hook the reader and make her feel like investing time in your work. You will have to learn how to balance clarity and precision, so that your ideas come across without either ambiguity or stifling formality. Generally, grad students don't arrive with the ability to communicate well. This is a skill that they forge in grad school. The sooner acquired, the better. Unfortunately, the only way to get better at writing is to do a lot of it. 10,000 hours is the magical number folks throw around to become an expert at something. You'll never even get close to 10,000 hours of writing by writing papers. Assuming negligible practice writing for public consumption before graduate school, if you take six years to get through grad school, you can hit 10,000 hours by writing about 5 hours a day. (Toward the end of a Ph.D., it's not uncommon to break 12 hours of writing in a day.) That's why I recommend that new students start a blog. Even if no one else reads it, start one. You don't even have to write about your research. Practicing the act of writing is all that matters. Translations • Portuguese. Related posts • How to get into grad school. • Productivity tips for academics. • Recommended reading for grad students. • Academic job hunt advice.

English

sentence translation english

Last Update: 2015-03-05
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous
Warning: Contains invisible HTML formatting

Indonesian

Peter Wong Tung Ke kpa_jepot@yahoo.co.id Attn: Dear Friend, I am Mr. Peter Wong Tung, a staff member of HSBC Bank Malaysia. I have a business transaction which I will like to introduce you into that will be of our mutual benefit. (19,305,050.12) Nineteen Millions Three Hundred and Five Thousand, Fifty Dollars and Twelve Cents only. The above amount was left behind by a deceased client of mine who shares the same last names as yours. All confirmable documents to back up the claims will be made available to you prior to your acceptance and as soon as I receive your return mail via my email address, I will let you know what is required. I will like to hear from you so that I will explain more details about the transaction. Email on mrpeterwong@live.com.my Sincerely Yours Peter Wong T. HSBC MALAYSIA.

English

Indonesian translation google english

Last Update: 2014-09-22
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

Indonesian

MAU DAPAT UANG Rp3,000,000,- Perhari tanpa modal sepeserpun??? Iseng2 dpt duit nih yang suka online, bisa buat income hingga Rp3,000,000,- atau lebih dalam sehari tanpa modal. Cuma waktu 3 menit aja after baca ini. Saya mau berbagi program dari US yang bisa buat duit sampingan. Free register tanpa dikenakan biaya. Tiada modus penipuan (kalau anda rasa program ini bohong anda ga rugi apa2, anda toh ga keluar modal/duit sepeser pun). Syarat mudah, hanya punya bbm, FB or Wechat, Whatsapp or apapun juga dan suka online. Anda hanya perlu open Link dibawah dan register sebagai member. Sesudah register anda langsung dapat US $ 25 x10,000,- = Rp250,000,- Kemudian anda dpt Link anda sendiri. Seperti saya di bawah. Anda copy Link anda sendiri dan paste di FB, twitter, chat dan sebagainya. Setiap orang yang buka Link anda dan register anda akan menerima upah sebanyak $10 x Rp10,000,- = Rp100,000,- Mudah bukan?? Perusahaan ini membayar kita sebagai pengiklan Utk meningkatkan traffic situs WEB nya setiapa hari. Pencairan duit anda bisa pilih duitnya mau ditransfer ke rekening bank atau cek akan dipos langsung ke alamat rumah anda . Tunggu apalagi register sekarang juga klik link berikut: http://WeeklyYouthPay.com/?ref=212573 saya sudah membuktikannya. tdk keluar dana. kita hanya membantu iklan mrk saja kita dpt uang! Tentu ada targetna bila dlm waktu 1 bln kta bisa mencapai Withdrawal (300$)segera di coba dan dptkan hasilna

English

spoken

Last Update: 2014-08-20
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

Indonesian

Seymour summons a seemingly robotic being, called Mortiorchis, upon which he sits. As with previous Seymour battles, certain party members may use the Trigger Command to talk to him. For this battle, Kimahri can talk to Seymour to raise his Strength, and Yuna can talk to him to raise her Magic Defense. Seymour Flux can use the attack Lance of Atrophy to put an ally into Zombie status, and the Mortiorchis will combo with Full-Life, effectively KO'ing a character (unless the characters have high Agility, as well as many Holy Waters). Like Seymour Natus, he can also Banish Aeons, giving it approximately one turn to attack if summoned. Seymour Flux occasionally casts Protect and Reflect upon himself. Three turns in, Mortiorchis will start to use Cross Cleave, which deals around 2,000 damage to the whole party. Seymour will then cast Reflect on himself and rebound Flare at a party member, but a character with high Agility or in Haste may get a turn in between and can Dispel Seymour, causing him to cast the spell on himself. Total Annihilation is Seymour Flux's signature attack, as well as his deadliest, which requires three rounds of charging, and will kill anything but an extremely good party. If the player summons an aeon then Mortiorchis will postpone its use of Total Annihilation until Seymour Flux banishes it; therefore an aeon cannot be a shield for Total Annihilation. Strategy Seymour is vulnerable to the poison status (the Mortiorchis is immune), and if Lulu casts Bio on him, he will take 1,400 damage at the end of each of his turns (sometimes, he will get two turns in a row not long before Mortiorchis, so he'll use Lance of Atrophy on his first turn then skip the second, thus he will react to damage twice just a second apart); this will whittle down his health without, potentially, any other actions.

English

Seymour summons a seemingly robotic being, called Mortiorchis, upon which he sits. As with previous Seymour battles, certain party members may use the Trigger Command to talk to him. For this battle, Kimahri can talk to Seymour to raise his Strength, and Yuna can talk to him to raise her Magic Defense. Seymour Flux can use the attack Lance of Atrophy to put an ally into Zombie status, and the Mortiorchis will combo with Full-Life, effectively KO'ing a character (unless the characters have high Agility, as well as many Holy Waters). Like Seymour Natus, he can also Banish Aeons, giving it approximately one turn to attack if summoned. Seymour Flux occasionally casts Protect and Reflect upon himself. Three turns in, Mortiorchis will start to use Cross Cleave, which deals around 2,000 damage to the whole party. Seymour will then cast Reflect on himself and rebound Flare at a party member, but a character with high Agility or in Haste may get a turn in between and can Dispel Seymour, causing him to cast the spell on himself. Total Annihilation is Seymour Flux's signature attack, as well as his deadliest, which requires three rounds of charging, and will kill anything but an extremely good party. If the player summons an aeon then Mortiorchis will postpone its use of Total Annihilation until Seymour Flux banishes it; therefore an aeon cannot be a shield for Total Annihilation. Strategy Seymour is vulnerable to the poison status (the Mortiorchis is immune), and if Lulu casts Bio on him, he will take 1,400 damage at the end of each of his turns (sometimes, he will get two turns in a row not long before Mortiorchis, so he'll use Lance of Atrophy on his first turn then skip the second, thus he will react to damage twice just a second apart); this will whittle down his health without, potentially, any other actions.

Last Update: 2013-10-15
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

Indonesian

Antonius Nicky Riyant lahir di Muntok, Bangka Belitung, 28 Mei 1991. Dia biasa dipanggil Nicky. Dia mempunyai rambut hitam, mata yang bulat, juga hidung yang mancung. Nicky memiliki tinggi badan 169 cm dan berat badan 60 kg. Pecinta warna biru dan hitam ini adalah anak kedua dari dua bersaudara, kakaknya bernama Willy. Member Boyband XO-IX ini adalah salah satu dari tiga vokal utama XO-IX bahkan dia adalah lead vokal di XO-IX karena bisa dibilang vokalnya paling bagus bila dibanding dengan member yang lain. Menurut teman-temannya, Nicky adalah orang yang baik hati, cerdas, bijaksana, dan ramah, kadang juga pendiam, cuek, dan misterius. Personil termuda XO-IX ini sekarang sedang kuliah di Universitas London School Of Public Relation Jakartajurusan marketing. Nicky memiliki hobi menyanyi. Karena hobinya itu dia memiliki banyak lagu yang di cover dari musisi lain dan di aransemen menjadi accoustic, diantaranya : What About Now (Westlife), Just The Way You Are (Bruno Mars), Anyone Of Us (Gareth Gates), I Won't Give Up (Jason Mras), California Queen (Rihanna), One Thing (One Direction), etc.

English

saya mutohar. saya lahir di ngawi, 23 agustus 1994. saya tinggal di desa babadan kecamatan pangkur kabupaten ngawi. hobi saya adalah bermain bola volli. saya tidak mempunyai saudara. ayahku bernama .... dan ibuku bernama..... ok teman-teman disini saya akan menceritakan kegiatan sehari-hari saya. saya bangun tidur pukul 03.30. setelah bangun tidur saya bergegas mengambil air wudhu dan segera pergi ke masjid untuk melaksanakan sholat subuh. kemudian setelah itu saya menyiapkan perlengkpan sekolahku. dan setelah itu saya memasak nasi untuk sarapan pagiku. kemudian saya bergegas mandi dan ganti pakaian. selanjutnya aya pergi ke sekolah. saya sampai di sekolah jam 06.25.

Last Update: 2013-05-08
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

Indonesian

Tim SAR gabungan berhasil menemukan satu korban longsor di Dukuh Luwung Desa Plompong Sirampog Brebes. Korban bernama Taryo, 60 tahun, ditemukan dalam kondisi meninggal dunia. “Jenazahnya ditemukan tadi pagi sekitar pukul 08.00,” kata Kepala Desa Plompong, Nasuha, Jumat 8 Februari 2013. Ia mengatakan, jenazah Taryo ditemukan dalam keadaan tertelungkup. Lokasinya berada di dekat rumpun pohon bambu atau berada di sayap kanan timbunan material longsor. Nasuha menambahkan, pencarian akan terus dilakukan hingga semua jenazah bisa ditemukan. Dengan ditemukannya Taryo, berarti kini tinggal empat jenazah lagi yang masih dicari Tim SAR. Penemuan jenazah tersebut sudah diperkirakan sebelumnya oleh paranormal setempat, Bari Mubarok yang ikut melakukan pencarian. “Dia ditemukan di ladangnya sendiri, itu logika bukan sekedar penerawangan batin,” katanya. Bari sendiri sudah member tanda di mana letak para korban. Ia menancapkan ranting di tempat-tempat, yang menurut penerawangannya, merupakan letak posisi korban berada. Menurut dia, tak jauh dari posisi Taryo, ada jenazah lain yakni Sutar, 45 tahun. Sementara posisi Kasrap, 70 tahun, dan Sumi, 60 tahun—merupakan suami istri—posisinya sekitar 20 meter dari posisi Taryo. “Kalau Pak Radun posisinya berada di pusat longsoran sehingga akan menyulitkan untuk pencarian,” katanya. Tingginya material longsor yang mencapai empat meter cukup menyulitkan evakuasi korban. Alat berat tak bisa masuk ke lokasi karena beratnya medan yang berbukit-bukit.

English

google translation Indonesian Javanese

Last Update: 2013-02-11
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

Indonesian

Hi Dudi, Thanks for coming to my website. As you are doing your due diligence with Millionaire Marketing Mentors (MMM) you will find that there are no others out there that can TRULY match the RESULTS that our members are experience here. Dudi, what's exciting is that now you can truly enjoy a FANTASTIC 5-6 Figure income in just DAYS from now. MMM's compensation plan is truly exciting for every member. It is dynamically designed to incorporate the most effective reward system in today's direct-sale's business. We have members who are earning $50-$100k per month in less than a year in their business. There is no other business opport*unity that I know of that exists today where you can spend just a couple hours a week to make thousands, even tens of thousands of doll*ars a week. And the beautiful thing? You don't have to SELL anything to anyone You don't have to CONVINCE anyone of anything You don't have to even TALK to anyone - EVER! It's not M*L*M, Gifting, HYIP, or Investing It's the most incredible Hands-Fr*ee, Fully Automated business I've ever seen, that offers you More Time with your Family More Time to Take Vacations More Mone*y to get a Bigger House, a Newer Car, ...Nicer Clothes, Give to Charities, Plan ...for Retirement, Be DEB*T FRE*E, and ...So Much More! A turn-key automated business where EVERYTHING is set up for you from day one. I even give you FRE*E access to my tour guides, who do all the sifting, sorting, and selling for you, and tell your customers where to send the money. I can go on and on...but let's not spoil the show before we start right Dudi? What you want to do now is start here: http://app.getresponse.com/click.html?x=a62b

English

Disater in bali

Last Update: 2012-03-18
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Wikipedia

Get a better translation with
4,401,923,520 human contributions

Users are now asking for help:



We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more. OK