Usted buscó: to whom you sent the invoice (Danés - Italiano)

if you decide to use a broker to find rented accommodation in frankfurt , we will reimburse 50 % of the fees upon presentation of the invoice and proof of payment .
if you decide to use a broker to find rented accommodation in frankfurt , we will reimburse 50 % of the fees upon presentation of the invoice and proof of payment .

the direct participant shall receive the invoice for the previous month specifying the fees to be paid , no later than on the fifth business day of the following month .
the direct participant shall receive the invoice for the previous month specifying the fees to be paid , no later than on the fifth business day of the following month .

participants shall ensure that any third parties to whom they outsource , delegate or subcontract tasks which have or may have an impact on the performance of their obligations under these conditions are bound by the confidentiality requirements in this article .
participants shall ensure that any third parties to whom they outsource , delegate or subcontract tasks which have or may have an impact on the performance of their obligations under these conditions are bound by the confidentiality requirements in this article .

(fortsat 6) any event. unqualified mareva injunctions covering assets abroad can never be justified, either before or after judgment, because they involve an exorbitant assertion of jurisdiction of an in rem nature over third parties outside the jurisdiction of our courts. they cannot be controlled or policed by our courts, and they are not subjected to the control of the local courts, as the european court advised in denilauler at p. 1570 they should be. in consequence, as can be seen from the correspondence between the plain tiffs' solicitors and the 47 or so third parties to whom the injunctions were notified in the present case, any purported assertion of such jurisdiction is unworkable and merely gives rise to problems and disputes.
(seguito 1) a) in art. 26 abs. 1 eugvÜ (sogar) als grundsatz aufgestellt worden ist, daß entscheidungen (i. s. von art. 25 eugvÜ) an sich „ipso jure" anzuerkennen sind, b) nach art. 33 abs. 3, 47 nr. 1 eugvÜ der erteilung einer vollstreckungsklausel im vollstreckungsstaat, der nicht zugleich urteilsstaat ¡st, der nachweis durch den gläubiger vorangehen muß, „daß die entscheidung nach dem recht des urteilsstaats vollstreckbar ist und daß sie zugestellt worden ist".