Usted buscó: linguee (Francés - Inglés)

linguee
4.1.1. level one: emerging safety is defined in terms of technical and procedural solutions and compliance with regulations. safety is not seen as a key business risk and the safety department is perceived to have primary responsibility for safety. many accidents are seen as unavoidable and as part of the job. most frontline staff are uninterested in safety and may only use safety as the basis for other arguments, such as changes in shift systems. 4.1.2. level two: managing the organisation’s accident rate is average for its industrial sector but they tend to have more serious accidents than average. safety is seen as a business risk and management time and effort is put into accident prevention. safety is solely defined in terms of adherence to rules and procedures and engineering controls. accidents are seen as preventable. managers perceive that the majority of accidents are solely caused by the unsafe behaviour of front-line staff. safety performance is measured in terms of lagging indicators such as lti and safety incentives are based on reduced lti rates. senior managers are reactive in their involvement in health and safety (i.e. they use punishment when accident rates increase). 4.1.3. level three: involving accident rates are relatively low, but they have reached a plateau. the organisation is convinced that the involvement of the frontline employee in health and safety is critical, if future improvements are going to be achieved. managers recognise that a wide range of factors cause accidents and the root causes often originate from management decisions. a significant proportion of frontline employees are willing to work with management to improve health and safety. the majority of staff accept personal responsibility for their own health and safety. safety performance is actively monitored and the data is used effectively. 4.1.4. level four: cooperating the majority of staff in the organisation are convinced that health and safety is important from both a moral and economic point of view. managers and frontline staff recognise that a wide range of factors cause accidents and the root causes are likely to come back to management decisions. frontline staff accept personal responsibility for their own and others health and safety. the importance of all employees feeling valued and treated fairly is recognised. the organisation puts significant effort into proactive measures to prevent accidents. safety performance is actively monitored using all data available. non-work accidents are also monitored and a healthy lifestyle is promoted. 4.1.5. level five continuous improvement the prevention of all injuries or harm to employees (both at work and at home) is a core company value. the organisation has had a sustained period (years) without a recordable accident or high potential incident, but there is no feeling of complacency. they live with the paranoia that their next accident is just around the corner. the organisation uses a range of indicators to monitor performance but it is not performance-driven, as it has confidence in its safety processes. the organisation is constantly striving to be better and find better ways of improving hazard control mechanisms. all employees share the belief that health and safety is a critical aspect of their job and accept that the prevention of non-work injuries is important. the company invests considerable effort in promoting health and safety at home

de nombreuses personnes utilisent par exemple antidote et linguee afin de faciliter leur travail, sans être pour autant des professionnels de la langue.
for example, many people use antidote and linguee to facilitate their work without being language professionals.