Usted buscó: invocation of (Inglés - Maltés)

based on recent experience, 5 to 10 cases per year may require invocation of the consistency mechanism.
abbażi tal-esperjenza reċenti, jista’ jkun hemm minn 5 sa 10 każijiet fis-sena li jistgħu jeħtieġu l-invokazzjoni tal-mekkaniżmu ta’ konsistenza.

based on recent experience, there may be 5 to 10 cases per year requiring invocation of the consistency mechanism.
abbażi tal-esperjenza reċenti, jista’ jkun hemm minn 5 sa 10 każijiet fis-sena li jkunu jeħtieġu l-invokazzjoni tal-mekkaniżmu ta’ konsistenza.

member states may create a reserve and introduce a fee for the concessions, which under normal conditions may be recalled by the member states only after expiration of their validity or invocation of an early warning.
l-istati membri jistgħu joħolqu riserva u jintroduċu ħlas għall-konċessjonijiet, li f'kundizzjonijiet normali jistgħu jiġu rtirati mill-istati membri wara l-iskadenza tal-validità tagħhom jew invokazzjoni ta' twissija bikrija.

this obligation is without prejudice to paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of article 16, the invocation of which shall in no case be construed as permitting a member state to decline to supply information solely because it has no domestic interest in such information.
dan l-obbligu huwa mingħajr ħsara għall-paragrafi 2, 3 u 4 skont l-artikolu 16, li l-invokazzjoni tiegħu ma għandu bl-ebda mod tinftiehem li tippermetti stat membru jirrifjuta li jforni informazzjoni sempliċiment minħabba li ma jkollux l-ebda interess domestiku f'tali informazzjoni.

in particular, the regulation restricts the invocation of this clause only to cases of negative growth, and unless this is substantial (-2%), it requires that countries should present supporting evidence.
ir-regolament, b'mod partikolari, jirestrinġi r-rikors għal din il-klawżola biss għal każijiet ta’ tkabbir negattiv, u jekk dan ma jkunx sostanzjali (2%), ikun jeħtieġ li l-pajjiżi jippreżentaw evidenza ta’ appoġġ.

relying on the caselaw of the court of justice concerning the scope of the prohibition on ruling ultra petita (67), moreover, the court held that, in the event that the defendant institution should fail to raise a legal consideration, invocation of which would have established the legality of the contested decision, it is for the community judicature to take such a legal consideration into account in order to preclude the annulment of a lawful act.
barra minn hekk, filwaqt li bbażat ruħha fuq il-ġurisprudenza talqorti talĠustizzja dwar ilportata talprojbizzjoni li tiddeċiedi ultra petita67, ilqorti talprim’istanza ddeċidiet li, l- każ li istituzzjoni konvenuta ma tqajjimx kunsiderazzjoni legali li l-invokazzjoni tagħha tistabbilixxi l-legalità ta’ l-att ikkontestat, hija l-qorti komunitarja li għandha tqis kunsiderazzjoni legali bħal din sabiex tevita li att legali jiġi annullat.