検索ワード: ja de skrabede, (デンマーク語 - 英語)

ja, de har.
yes, they do.

ja, de har ret.
president of the commission. - yes, you are right.

ja, de har helt ret.
yes, you may well be right.

ja, de hørte rigtigt.
yes, you heard me correctly.

formanden. — ja, de har ret.
president. — mr flanagan, i do not agree.

ja, de findes helt tydeligt.
it is quite obvious that there are.

ja, de har forstået det rigtigt.
you have understood right.

ja, de er vel nok" svære".
'difficult ' indeed, sir.

ja, de er til stede i afghanistan.
yes, they are in afghanistan.

ja, de hørte rigtigt: 2,6%.
you have heard me: 2.6%.

bangemann. - (de) ja, de har helt ret.
bangemann. ­ (de) yes, you may well be right.

disse præferencer skal bevares, ja, de skal udbygges.
these preferences must be maintained and in fact extended.

ja, de bliver mere beklemmende fra topmøde til topmøde.
and from one summit to the next they are getting worse.

ja, de fleste formoder, at dette allerede er tilfældet.
indeed most of them assume that is already the case.

ja, de har afgjort, at vi skal fastholde den hidtidige ordning.
almost the commonest question we are all asked is: 'when are you going to decide to stay in one place where we can find you?'

hr. formand, hr. seppänen, ja, de har forstået mig rigtigt.
mr president, yes mr seppänen, you understood me correctly.

hr. formand, ja, de har ret, fru de palacio- dialog, ja.
mr president, yes, mrs palacio, you are absolutely right- what we need is dialogue.

de forekommer i enhver levende krop. ja, de forekommer i enhver krop.
i am afraid i got carried away in the heat of debate and i would like the last sentence of my explanation to be removed from the record, if possible.

og al ligevel fortsætter forstyrrelser og vanskeligheder, ja, de bli ver endog værre.
yet the disorders and difficulties continue, indeed they get worse.

i stedet for et middelmådigt og usselt kriterium, der kun tager højde for de skrabede midler, er et kriterium, der hviler på klare demokratiske principper, at foretrække.
a criterion based on unambiguously democratic principles would have been better than a mediocre, mean-spirited criterion that was unable to look beyond the scarcity of funding.