검색어: contra factum non valet argumentum (라틴어 - 영어)

contra factum non valet argumentum
discussion is useless againts the facts

contra factum non est argumentum
ignorance is not an argument

contra factum non datur argumentum
il n'ya aucun argument contre l'acte

non valet
valesne

factum non fabula
factum non fabula

a posse ad esse non valet consequentia
deductive inference is not « ab esse ad

ab esse ad posse valet,a posse ad esse non valet consequentia. ab igne ignem capere
the argument is valid from the turned out to be, to be able to maintain the validity of your argument from the. from the fire to catch fire

aurora1 dea tithonum, virum pulchrum, amabat. venit igitur ad iovem2: "o rex deorum," dicit, "audi me! meus tithonus non est deus; post paucos annos3 ad senectutem veniet. si vitam perpetuam viro dabis, te semper laudabo." stulta aurora! magnum periculum doni non vides. immortalitatem tithono dat iuppiter, sed vir, dum vivit, senescit4. tempus fugit: nunc aurora bella, tithonus non bellus est. corpus rugosum5 curvumque iam non valet; sapientia in animō non manet. quid aurora faciet? poteritne f
aurora1 goddess tithonum, a handsome, desperately. he therefore iovem2: "oh, king of the gods," he says, "listen to me! tithonus is not my god, after a few years3 come to old age. if you give a man eternal life, you will always sing." dawn silly! great is the danger of gift does not you see that. jupiter gives the immortality of the couch, tithonus, but the husband, while he liveth, senescit4. time flies, now dawn wars, tithonus there is war. the body rugosum5 was straightened now, is not valid; wisdom in the animô does not remain. dawn what will he do? will f