전문 번역가, 번역 회사, 웹 페이지 및 자유롭게 사용할 수 있는 번역 저장소 등을 활용합니다.
bpb 138,6 miliónov eur,
bpb eur 138,6 million,
마지막 업데이트: 2014-11-21
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
bpb plc (ďalej len „bpb“),
bpb plc (hereinafter: bpb),
마지막 업데이트: 2014-11-21
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
bpb: najneskôr od 31. marca 1992 do 25. novembra 1998,
bpb: from 31 march 1992, at the latest, to 25 november 1998,
마지막 업데이트: 2014-11-21
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
súd prvého stupňa tak priznal bpb dodatočné zníženie sumy pokuty o 10 %.
the court therefore granted bpb an additional reduction of 10 % of the amount of its fine.
마지막 업데이트: 2014-02-06
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
bpb plc: najneskôr od 31. marca 1992 do 25. novembra 1998;
bpb plc: from 31 march 1992, at the latest, to 25 november 1998;
마지막 업데이트: 2014-11-21
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
spoločnosť bpb okrem toho uznala jednu časť skutočností, ktoré boli popísané v oznámení o zohľadnení námietok.
in addition, bpb also recognised in part the facts which were described in the statement of objections.
마지막 업데이트: 2014-11-21
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
zvýšenie základnej výšky pokuty o 50 % pre spoločnosti bpb a lafarge sa javí ako oprávnené z dôvodu priťažujúcej okolnosti.
with regard to the above aggravating factors, an increase of 50 % of the basic amount of the fine for bpb and lafarge appears justified.
마지막 업데이트: 2014-11-21
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
skôr ako komisia prijala svoje oznámenie o zohľadnení námietok, spoločnosti bpb a gyproc jej poskytli informácie a/alebo dokumenty.
before the commission adopted its statement of objections, bpb and gyproc provided it with information and/or documents.
마지막 업데이트: 2014-11-21
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
o konaní podľa článku 81 zmluvy o es proti bpb plc, gebrüder knauf westdeutsche gipswerke kg, société lafarge sa a gyproc benelux n.v.
relating to proceedings under article 81 of the ec treaty against bpb plc, gebrüder knauf westdeutsche gipswerke kg, société lafarge sa and gyproc benelux nv
마지막 업데이트: 2014-11-21
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
otázka postupov v prípade zneužitia dominantného postavenia bola predložená súdu prvého stupňa a súdnemu dvoru v prípade bpb industries and british gypsum vs. komisia [22].
the question of procedures in cases of abuse of a dominant position was referred to by the court of first instance and the court of justice in the bpb industries and british gypsum v. commission case (22).
마지막 업데이트: 2014-11-21
사용 빈도: 1
품질: