검색어: uporaba predvajalnika media player (슬로베니아어 - 영어)

kameraportable media player device type
camera

(2) vezava predvajalnika windows media player na operacijski sistem windows
(2) tying of windows media player with windows

zgodovinaxbmc je naslednik popularnega xbox media player (xbmp) programa.
xbox media player development stopped on 13 december 2003, by which time its successor, xbmc, was ready for its debut, renamed as it was growing out of its 'player' name and into a 'center' for media playback.

drugo ravnanje, ki ga je sankcionirala komisija, je vezana prodaja večpredstavnostnega predvajalnika windows media player in operacijskega sistema windows.
the second type of conduct found by the commission to constitute an infringement is the bundling of windows media player with the windows operating system.

da zagotovi različico operacijskega sistema za osebne računalnike windows, ki ne vsebuje predvajalnika windows media player („protiukrep nevezanosti“).
to make available a version of the windows pc operating system which does not include windows media player (“the untying remedy”).

komisija je v tej odločbi obsodila microso ovo zavrnitev dajanja podatkov za interoperabilnost in vezavo predvajalnika m i c r o so media player na sistem windows.
in this decision the commission condemned microso ’s refusal to supply interoperability information and the tying of windows and windows media player.

• da zagotovi različico operacijskega sistema za osebne računalnike windows, ki ne vsebuje predvajalnika windows media player („ukrep nevezanosti“).
— to make available a version of the windows pc operating system which does not include windows media player (‘the untying remedy’).

xbox media player je končal z razvojem 13. decembra 2003, v času ko je bil njegov naslednik xbmc pripravljen za izdajo.
the first stable release of xbmc was on 29 june 2004, with the official release of xboxmediacenter 1.0.0.

družba microsoft je na trgu streaming predvajalnikov z vezavo svojega ločenega proizvoda – predvajalnika windows media player – na prevladujoč operacijski sistem za osebne računalnike windows škodila konkurenci.
microsoft harmed competition in the streaming media player market by tying with its dominant windows pc operating system a separate product - its windows media player.

drugo vedenje, ki ga je kaznovala komisija, je vezana prodaja multimedijskega predvajalnika windows media player skupaj z operacijskim sistemom windows. komisija je menila, da je to ravnanje vplivalo na konkurenco na trgu multimedijskih predvajalnikov.
the second type of conduct sanctioned by the commission was the tying of windows media player with the windows operating system.

razpoložljivost operacijskega sistema windows za odjemalske osebne računalnike pogojeval s sočasno pridobitvijo programa windows media player (wmp) od maja 1999 do datuma te odločbe.
making the availability of the windows client pc operating system conditional on the simultaneous acquisition of windows media player (wmp) from may 1999 until the date of this decision.

to je pomenilo, da konkurenti niso mogli enakopravno tekmovati na trgu; in(ii) nakup operacijskega sistema windows vezal na hkratni nakup ločenega izdelka windows media player.
this meant that rivals could not compete fairly in the market; and(ii) made the purchase of windows conditional on the simultaneous acquisition of microsoft’s separate windows media player product.

komisija je kljub temu ocenila, da je podjetje kršilo člen 82 in zlorabljalo prevladujoči položaj na trgu operacijskih sistemov za osebne računalnike, ker je odklanjalo dobavo podatkov o medoperativnosti in predvsem ker je nakup operacijskega sistema windows vezalo na hkratni nakup izdelka windows media player.
nevertheless, the commission decided that article 82 had been infringed, through microsoft's abuse of a dominant position in the pc operating systems market by refusing to provide information on interoperability and above all by bundling windows media player with windows.

posledica tega je bila, da so bili skoraj vsi osebni računalniki opremljeni z izdelkom windows media player, in je zato izkrivljal konkurenco s tem, da je umetno prisilil ponudnike vsebin in razvijalce aplikacij k uporabi medijske platforme windows.na odločitev se je microsoft pritožil na evropsko sodišče prve stopnje.
this had the effect of populating virtually all pcs with windows media player, and hence distorting competition by artificially driving content providers and applications developers to the windows media platform.microsoft has appealed to the european court of first instance against this decision.

poleg globe več kot 497 milijonov eurov je komisija družbi microsoft naložila, da naj odpravi ugotovljeni zlorabi, s tem da razkrije nujne informacije o interoperabilnosti podjetjem, ki želijo razvijati in distribuirati operacijske sisteme za strežnike delovnih skupin, in da ponudi v prodajo različico operacijskega sistema windows pc, ki ne vsebuje programa windows media player.
as regards the cartels at issue, the court found that the global arrangements and the european arrangements were not applied at the same time, pursued dierent objectives and were implemented by dissimilar methods and that the commission had not demonstrated that the european producers intended to adhere to the global arrangements in order subsequently to divide the european economic area market.

drugič, sodišče prve stopnje je glede zlorabe zaradi vezane prodaje operacijskega sistema windows za osebne računalnike in predvajalnika windows media player menilo, da je bila analiza sestavin vezane prodaje, ki jo je opravila komisija, skladna s členom 82 es in s sodno prakso45, pri tem pa je opozorilo, da za te sestavine velja: prvič, zavezujoči in vezani proizvod sta dva ločena proizvoda, drugič, zadevno podjetje ima prevladujoči položaj na trgu zavezujočega proizvoda, tretjič, navedeno podjetje potrošnikom ne daje možnosti, da dobijo zavezujoči proizvod brez vezanega proizvoda, in četrtič, zadevna praksa omejuje konkurenco.
however, as the infringement had as its object the sharing of the product markets and the geographic market, which is characterised as ‘very serious’ by the guidelines, the court considered that the absence of reasoning relating to market denition could not, in this case, lead to the cancellation or reduction of the fine, it being noted that the commission had chosen the minimum starting amount provided for in the guidelines for such an infringement.