전문 번역가, 번역 회사, 웹 페이지 및 자유롭게 사용할 수 있는 번역 저장소 등을 활용합니다.
interreligious dialogue
tagalog
마지막 업데이트: 2022-11-02
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
추천인:
dialogue
parang
마지막 업데이트: 2021-12-05
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
추천인:
dialogue journals
diyalogo ng diyalogo
마지막 업데이트: 2020-02-05
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
추천인:
meaning of dialogue
kahulugan ng diyalogo
마지막 업데이트: 2020-08-30
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
추천인:
dialogue on el filibusterismo
dialogue sa el filibusterismo
마지막 업데이트: 2020-03-09
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
추천인:
listening/speaking dialogue
listening speaking dialogue
마지막 업데이트: 2021-03-13
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
추천인:
dialogue example in tagalog
dialogue halimbawa sa tagalog
마지막 업데이트: 2017-01-26
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
추천인:
dialogue using mix mix language
dayalogo gamit ang mix mix lengwahe
마지막 업데이트: 2021-04-29
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
추천인:
dialogue sa el filibusterismo ni camaroncocido
camaroncocido
마지막 업데이트: 2021-04-09
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
추천인:
dialogue of noli me tangere kabanata 19
dialogue of noli me tangere chapter 19
마지막 업데이트: 2019-02-10
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
추천인:
what is dialogue is the meaning in dialogue
마지막 업데이트: 2020-10-09
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
추천인:
how did you find the previties were they confusing dont worry this next activity can help you base on the dialogue that you made answer the graphic organizer for the elements of a play below,
마지막 업데이트: 2021-02-26
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
추천인:
is a set of values, attitudes, modes of behavior and ways of life that reject violence and prevent conflicts by tackling their root causes to solve problems through dialogue and negotation among individuals, groups and nations
kultura ng kapayapaan
마지막 업데이트: 2020-10-27
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
추천인:
communities that isolate people and have few mechanisms for interpersonal interaction encourage and sustain crime. those that implement forms of community dialogue to identify problems and plan tactics for their elimination, guided by restorative justice practices and principles, may create a climate in which violent crime is less likely to occur.
마지막 업데이트: 2021-04-13
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
추천인:
now that restorative justice has raised her gaian ecological purpose, to restore multiculturing peace in polyphonic polypathic turquoise eden, how do you continue to justify a win/lose retributive justice evolutionary philosophy of law and moral order as contributing to healthy win/win regeneratively revolutionary democracy? asked the ecosystemic judge of unitingnations jurisdiction. restorative justice was never intended to be effective where either victims or predators are unwilling, often incapable, of re-engaging in cooperative interdependent win/win dialogue, egalitarian discernment in-between trust and mistrust and hostile distrust and restorative retrust. so you argue win/win regenerative assumptions of natural/spiritual creatures are not safely, and not realistically, accessible for all the healing dreams and purposes endemic to our gaian muse of justice? an insufficiency of experience with healthy democratic peace; yes. and, how will continuing to primally rely on win/lose retribution, where victims and a healthy society are presumed to win by punishing criminals and loser scofflaws, lead us toward this noble, and globally multicultural, goal of achieving healthy democratic peace for all earth's regenerative creatures? retributive justice is the state's weapon to protect the common good from further injustice, a deterring threat; not a tool or medicine toward an actively remediating peace, domestic or international, private or public resonant health.
now that restorative justice has raised her gaian ecological purpose, to restore multiculturing peace in polyphonic polypathic turquoise eden, how do you continue to justify a win/lose retributive justice evolutionary philosophy of law and moral order as contributing to healthy win/win regeneratively revolutionary democracy? asked the ecosystemic judge of unitingnations jurisdiction. restorative justice was never intended to be effective where either victims or predators are unwilling, often incapable, of re-engaging in cooperative interdependent win/win dialogue, egalitarian discernment in-between trust and mistrust and hostile distrust and restorative retrust. so you argue win/win regenerative assumptions of natural/spiritual creatures are not safely, and not realistically, accessible for all the healing dreams and purposes endemic to our gaian muse of justice? an insufficiency of experience with healthy democratic peace; yes. and, how will continuing to primally rely on win/lose retribution, where victims and a healthy society are presumed to win by punishing criminals and loser scofflaws, lead us toward this noble, and globally multicultural, goal of achieving healthy democratic peace for all earth's regenerative creatures? retributive justice is the state's weapon to protect the common good from further injustice, a deterring threat; not a tool or medicine toward an actively remediating peace, domestic or international, private or public resonant health.
마지막 업데이트: 2020-10-08
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
추천인: