Je was op zoek naar: no the question is are you having fun (Frans - Engels)

the question is -
the question is -

the question is not.
the question is not.

but, the question is...
but, the question is...

the question is who's left.
the question is who's left.

the question is the source material.
the question is the source material.

the question is what standard to apply.
the question is what standard to apply.

the question is then how do you make sure those radio(...)
the question is then how do you make sure those radio(...)

"the question is, what can you make people believe that you have done.
c’est ce que vous paraissez avoir fait qui est tout.

the question is "why (do you like both of them) ?", correct?
the question is "why (do you like both of them) ?", correct?

bbc news - wind farms: 'the question is, who will pay?'
bbc news - wind farms: 'the question is, who will pay?'

the question is whether the imposition of a 5% restriction was essential or not.
lastly, we would mention a decision reported by the press (not yet published in legal reviews).

i like to be naughty, to try new things, to share with you my fantasy.but the question is, are you ready for me?!
i like to be naughty, to try new things, to share with you my fantasy.but the question is, are you ready for me?!

with the establishment of the european external action service, the question is what role culture can play in eu foreign policy and the daily exercise of union interests.
with the establishment of the european external action service, the question is what role culture can play in eu foreign policy and the daily exercise of union interests.

any change of employment is likely to involve some risk of temporary or interim unemployment and the question is whether the voluntary conduct of the claimant has been such as to create an unreasonable risk of such unemployment.
any change of employment is likely to involve some risk of temporary or interim unemployment and the question is whether the voluntary conduct of the claimant has been such as to create an unreasonable risk of such unemployment. if it has, the claimant has acted without just cause.

«the question is simply whether or not on the record there has been demonstrated evidence of prejudice of sufficient magnitude to impact on the fairness of the hearinq.»
the question is simply whether or not on the record there has been demonstrated evidence of prejudice of sufficient magnitude to impact on the fairness of the hearing.

such an approach will - despite its desire for rationality - beg the question : is it ever possible to present proof that is uncontroversial or even remotely objective?
such an approach will - despite its desire for rationality -- beg the question: is it ever possible to present proof that is uncontroversial or even remotely objective?

"nay, nay, brother stangerson," cried the other; "the question is not how many wives we have, but how many we can keep.
— non, non, frere stangerson, s’écria l’autre. il ne s’agit pas de savoir combien de femmes nous avons, mais combien nous pouvons en entretenir.

please enter the result of this operation in the following box. (example: if the question is "1 + 3", fill "4")
please enter the result of this operation in the following box. (example: if the question is "1 + 3", fill "4")

if your simulation does not define abstract data types, consider grouping elements of data that are closely related or ask yourself the question "is a circumstance likely to arrive where another federate would be interested in receiving only one member of a grouping of data?"
as such, defining complex data types should be as simple as creating complex data types (using a tool like the omdt) that are analogous to your simulation abstract data types.

en l'espèce, le jugement majoritaire du conseil concluait que: 1-la question devant eux n'était pas à savoir si l'employé avait négligé de remplir une obligation normale et habituelle due à son employeur (the issue was not whether a normal or ususal standard of care owed to an employer was breached); 2- que la question qu'il devait trancher était à savoir si le prestataire avait enfreint le protocole (the question is whether the terms of the of the claimant's memorandum of settlement (the ‘agreement') were breached); et que 3-le prestataire avait enfreint ledit protocole et que ceci constituait une "inconduite" sous l'article 30 de la loi ( we conclude that the dlaimant's breach of clear and unambiguous terms of his contractual agreement with his employer constitute misconduct within the meaning of section 30).
and lastly, it is settled that "an objective assessment [is] needed sufficient to say that misconduct was in fact the cause of the loss of employment" 4, that an employer's mere assurance that it believes the conduct in question is misconduct will not be sufficient 5 and that "(f) or a board of referees to conclude that there was misconduct by an employee, it must have before it sufficiently detailed evidence for it to be able, first, to know how the employee behaved, and second, to decide whether such behaviour was reprehensible." (joseph a-636-85).