Você procurou por: that we would not other wise share (Inglês - Tagalo)

so that we would not be disturbed
para hindi ka na maabala

so that we would not have to suffer
para hindi na kami mahirapan pangongolekta

we would not tease in sunnyfield
we would not manunukso sa sunnyfield

if it got dark we would not find the way
if it got dark we would need not find the way

without him we would not be in the world
paano tayo magsisimula

it never entered my mind that we would get along
kabir isang beses hindi pumasok sa isip ko na magkakasundo tayo

we would not be working in isolation on this research.
hindi kami magtatrabaho na magkahiwalay sa pananaliksik na ito.

we were nobody nung simula hahahhaa i never thought that we would be this close😌
hindi ko naisip na kaya kong magmahal ulitnn

i'm gonna be the love that gonna last ain't nothing never that bad that we would be together
ako ang magiging pag-ibig na magtatagal

senen washed wished and plus wiped all that dishes that was it we would not have to tell him or anybody anyone else those that things no worries no worry at all except senen
naghilamos si senen at nagpunas ng lahat ng mga pinggan na iyon ay hindi na namin kailangang sabihin sa kanya o kahit kanino pa ang mga bagay na walang pag-aalala no alalahanin maliban kay senen

i also listened and sang on the radio and prayed that we would all be safe, all to be cured of covid 19 disease and all would be back to normal. i was always at home not too outgoing. let's just trust in god that it will end all the hardships we have been given.
nakinig at nag misa rin ako sa radyo at pinagdarasal ko na sana ligtas tayong lahat, lahat makarecover sa sakit ng covid 19 at bumalik na rin sa normal ang lahat. parati lang din ako sa bahay hindi din masyadong naglalabas. magtiwala lang tayo sa diyos na matatapos rin itong lahat ng matinding pagsubok na binigay sa atin.

a) 1/5 = 0.20 b) 1/6 = 0.166 c) 2/11 = 0.1818 d) 11/20 = 0.55 e) 2/9 = 0.222 as you can see, the closest fraction to our result, 0.188, is 2/11, so the right choice for this question is option c). my advice considering how close are options a) and c), it would be too risky taking round figures in this exercise, e.g., 3.5 and 6 million for the population, and 56 100, 20 700 and 28 200 for the gdp per capita. besides, as in the previous exercise, we would not gain much time by doing so. on the other hand, we could also convert every option into percentage format, but note that this is not necessary at al with our original result, 0.188, so it would be a waste of our (always valuable) time. 76
region population gdp per (millions) capita (eur) brussels 1.0 56 104 wallonia 3.4 20 670 flanders 6.1 28 241 (excluding brussels) first, we can calculate the gdp of brussels, which is: 1.0 million persons * 56 104 eur/person = 56 104 million eur note that we have cleared the magnitude 'persons' in both the numerator and the denominator, in the way that we already know. then, we obtain the total gdp of belgium, by adding the gdps of every region: brussels (already calculated): 56 104 million eur wallonia: 3.4 million persons * 20 670 eur/person = 70 278 million eur flanders (excluding brussels): 6.1 million persons * 28 241 eur/person = = 172 270. 1 million eur total gdp: 56 104 + 70 278 + 172 270. 1 = 298 652. 1 million eur so now we can get the share of brussels in this total: 56 104 / 298 652. 1 = 0.188 => 18.8% in percentage format, but we do not even need it for this exercise. which is closest fraction among the available options to answer this question? apart from the first alternative, they are not very easy to calculate mentally, so you can use your calculator to make sure: 75