Você procurou por: deggendorf (Letão - Inglês)

Deggendorf princips
Deggendorf principle

Deggendorf judikatūra
Deggendorf case-law

Deggendorf lietas tiesu prakse
The Deggendorf Jurisprudence

Deggendorf lietas tiesu prakses piemērošana
Applying the Deggendorf case-law

KUMULĒŠANA UN TIESU PRAKSE DEGGENDORF LIETĀ
CUMULATION AND THE DEGGENDORF JURISPRUDENCE

Apvienojums ar iepriekšējo nesaderīgo atbalstu – Deggendorf
Combination with previous incompatible aid — Deggendorf

Deggendorf lietas tiesu prakses izmantošana šai lietā
Application of the Deggendorf jurisprudence to the case

Tāpēc Deggendorf lietas tiesu prakse nebija piemērojama.
So, Deggendorf was not applicable.

Tāpēc Deggendorf lietas tiesu prakses piemērošanai nebija iemesla.
As a consequence, there was no reason to apply the Deggendorf jurisprudence.

Spriedums Deggendorf lietā un atbalsts ACEA Electrabel (Itālija)350
Application of the Deggendorf case law – Aid to ACEA Electrabel (Italy)350

Spriedums Deggendorf lietā un atbalsts ACEA Electrabel (Itālija)337
Report on Competition Policy 2005 ity of Rome(338).

Tāpēc Rumānija uzskata, ka paziņotais atbalsts atbilst tā sauktajam Deggendorf principam.
As a consequence, Romania considers that the notified aid is in compliance with the so-called Deggendorf principle.

Itālija uzskata, ka Deggendorf prakse neattiecas uz šo lietu atšķirīgās izcelsmes dēļ.
Italy claims that the Deggendorf jurisprudence should not apply in this case, given the different origin of the case.

Itālija uzskata, ka Komisija Deggendorf lietas tiesu praksi attiecina pārāk plaši.
Italy claims that the Commission is making a use of the Deggendorf jurisprudence which is too wide.

Deggendorf lietas tiesu prakse būtu jāpiemēro tikai atsevišķam atbalstam, nevis shēmām.
The Deggendorf jurisprudence should apply only to individual aid and not to schemes.

Turklāt Iestāde arī sāka sistemātiski piemērot tiesas praksi Deggendorf lietā [12].
In addition, the Authority has also started to apply the Deggendorf case law [12] in a systematic manner.

Tomēr ir trīs papildu komentāri, īpaši attiecībā uz Deggendorf lietas tiesu prakses piemērošanu.
There are however three additional comments in particular on the application of the Deggendorf jurisprudence:

Itālija un ACEA izvirzīja vairākus argumentus attiecībā uz Deggendorf lietas tiesu prakses izmantošanu šai lietā.
Italy and ACEA put forward a number of arguments on the application of the Deggendorf jurisprudence to this case.

Trešais ACEA papildarguments apgalvo, ka Komisija nav konsekventa, piemērojot Deggendorf lietas tiesu praksi.
The third additional argument that ACEA puts forward is the claim that the Commission is not coherent in its application of the jurisprudence Deggendorf.

Saņēmēja maiņa padara Deggendorf lietas tiesu praksi par nepiemērojamu, un šai lietai nav objekta.
The change of the beneficiary would have as a consequence that the Deggendorf jurisprudence should not apply and that the present case would be without object.