You searched for: that was a long story to i got your number (Engelska - Hindi)

Mänskliga bidrag

Från professionella översättare, företag, webbsidor och fritt tillgängliga översättningsdatabaser.

Lägg till en översättning

Engelska

Hindi

Info

Engelska

i got your number

Hindi

aap ka number mila

Senast uppdaterad: 2017-12-08
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym

Engelska

yesterday i got your number

Hindi

मैं आपको फोन करता हूं

Senast uppdaterad: 2019-04-24
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym

Engelska

i got your number from her

Hindi

maine tumhara number us se liya

Senast uppdaterad: 2017-06-08
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym

Engelska

i got your number from facebook

Hindi

मुझे आपका नंबर फेसबुक से mila tha

Senast uppdaterad: 2021-03-20
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym

Engelska

i got your number mil gya hai

Hindi

मुझे तुम्हारा कॉल का इंतजार रहेगा.

Senast uppdaterad: 2020-03-26
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym

Engelska

i got your number from ur wife

Hindi

mra no se nhai lag raha 198 no

Senast uppdaterad: 2016-09-21
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym

Engelska

i got your number from my friend

Hindi

i have given your number to my friend

Senast uppdaterad: 2021-09-29
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym

Engelska

i got your number from rahul sir

Hindi

मैं चाहता हूं कि आप कल पिंग करें

Senast uppdaterad: 2021-02-19
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym

Engelska

i got your number from workindia app

Hindi

मुझे आपका नंबर वर्कइंडिया ऐप से मिलेगा

Senast uppdaterad: 2021-07-01
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym

Engelska

i got your number from whatsapp group

Hindi

Senast uppdaterad: 2021-04-14
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym

Engelska

i got your number f rom one of my friend

Hindi

मैं अपने एक दोस्त से अपने नहीं मिला

Senast uppdaterad: 2020-08-26
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym

Engelska

she added, "that was a long time ago, and he's been very kind."

Hindi

उन्होंने कहा कि "यह बात पुरानी हो गई, और वह मेरे साथ अच्छा व्यवहार करते हैं।"

Senast uppdaterad: 2014-10-20
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym
Varning: Innehåller osynlig HTML-formatering

Engelska

i got your number at the last time preety's home and made a call and later never needed a call or sms for just wondering if you have anything good in this, so sms

Hindi

मेरे पास तेरा नंबर ता लास्ट टाइम प्रीती के घर पे आके कॉल किया ता और बाद में कभी नीड नही ता कॉल या एसएमएस के लिए अभी सोचा है कि क्या पाता इस में तेरा कुछ अच्छा हो इसलिए एसएमएस की

Senast uppdaterad: 2022-03-27
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym

Engelska

and so she went and asked him to send ram away for 14 years thinking that was a long enough time, that if you go away for 14 years, you're pretty much out of sight, out of mind.

Hindi

और इसलिए वह चला गया और उस से पूछा राम 14 साल के लिए दूर भेजने के लिए यह सोच कर कि एक लंबे समय पर्याप्त समय था, कि यदि आप 14 साल के लिए दूर जाना है, तुम बहुत ज्यादा बाहर दृष्टि के दिमाग से बाहर रहे हैं.

Senast uppdaterad: 2017-10-12
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym

Engelska

casey’s eyes were glued on the ferocious animal in front of her, heart beating wildly as she lay frozen in the tall, dry grass. from between the blades she watched the beautiful leopard placidly groom itself in the sun rays. casey wished she was close enough to feel the deep throated purring, but didn’t dare move. “look, momo,” she whispered to her friend laying next to her. after a pause she huffed, “of course it’s not a cheetah, silly. they have solid spots. look at its coat. hollow spots, not solid.” the stuffed lemur made no reply. casey cupped her hands around her eyes like binoculars and contemplated her next move. before she could come up with a plan, the cat suddenly pounced towards a scurrying critter casey couldn’t see. both predator and prey darted and dashed around the field before both scurried up the nearby tree and out of casey’s view. casey imagined what it would be like to be that prey, how scared and alone it must be. “you know momo, it’s kind of sad that the prey gets caught alone.” she gave a sigh as she stood up with the lemur dangling in her hand. “maybe if it had more friends… then life wouldn’t be so scary. then someone could be like a lookout or back up!” she looked down to the lemur and nodded. “i know... you’re my backup. just like i’m yours!” casey stood in the hot sun, sweat starting to bead on her forehead. “okay, the boss wants us to deliver our package before noon which is when the sun reaches the highest point in the sky.” she tilted her head to the sky to read the sun’s position, then stealthily snuck a peak at her hello kitty watch. “c’mon momo, we don’t have much time!” she took off down the path, her precious cargo bouncing in the bag on her back, momo swinging wildly in her grip. casey and lemur stopped at the edge of a big field on the edge of the park. “look at this grassland. we must be in the savanna!” she looked out over the field seeing a plethora of animals. “wow momo, look at the elephants and zebras. maybe we’ll see a gazelle.” she put momo down and grabbed her water bottle from the side of her bag. she tilted the bottle over momo’s mouth. she then removed the cap and took a sip, the cool water sliding down her parched throat. “no you can’t have more, we have to save it. it’s still a long journey.” she stared at the yellow button eyes. “i know this isn’t easy. but someone’s gotta do it.” she screwed the cap back on and slid the bottle back into its sleeve. “what do you mean i dragged you into this?” casey chatted with the lemur as she walked along the field but stopped talking when she heard noise coming from around the fence ahead. she swallowed hard and slowly peered around the corner, careful to be quiet. she saw four boys playing with a small animal. “look momo,” she whispered. “poachers!” she watched them toss a stick around the small gray animal. “they are hunting that poor baby rhino!” she watched the small french bulldog jump around between the boys chasing after the stick. then casey looked at the face of one of the boys. “oh no! it’s our arch nemesis. david the destroyer.” she glared at the boy then stuck her tongue out. she threw momo out then pulled him back in. “no, momo! we can’t just go after him. we are outnumbered.” she reached around and felt her bag. “besides, this isn’t the mission.” casey began walking away when a boy yelled out, “hey casey!” she gasped and started to run away. “he’ll ruin our mission!” casey ran along the fence until she found four scooters laying around. she grabbed the one she recognized and blasted off down the path leaving her nemesis calling after her. casey came to a stop when her heart couldn’t take any more and her lungs were burning from her dramatic escape; but she forgot all of it when she saw the challenge before her. “look momo. a maze of physical tests to keep anyone out of the temple. we will have to be tough.” she dropped the scooter at the edge of the park and raced towards her first challenge - the monkey bars. “hold onto me momo!” she strapped the lemur’s arms around her as she jumped up and gripped the hot metal. the hardest part was taking a hand off to reach for the next bar. she tried not to look down as she timed her swinging. not yet, she thought, straining against her grip. now! she boldly reached out, grabbed the next one and secured a solid grip, swung back a bit then launched her other hand onto the same bar. casey slowly, painfully, made her way across the bars, hands burning from refusing to let her fall. when she reached the end, she dropped back down and looked back. “phew! that could have been a deadly fall! you should keep holding onto me, i’ll get us through the rest.” casey climbed up colourful towers and slid down chutes, she jumped over and ducked under obstacles until she faced a harrowing threat. “ok, momo. if i can avoid these four swinging boulders, it’s a clear shot to the temple.” casey stared across the path along the swingset, transforming the four kids into hardened rocks. her eyes followed the swing in front of her, she darted through its path safely, narrowingly missing the next one as it swung in front of her. the laughter and chatter around her dissolved into jungle noises of bird and insect calls. she swung around and danced in time to the swaying, nimbly jumping across the grooves. suddenly a heavy weight hit her on her back, throwing her and momo to the ground. the kid scrambled off the swing and raced to casey who was sprawled on the ground. “are you okay? i didn’t see you!” the young boy reached a hand down to casey who was dazed from the blow as much as the hit of reality. casey kept her gaze down as she slowly sat up. she nodded shyly to the kid, then suddenly swooped up momo and ran to the end of the park before the kid could react. casey held momo close to her chest as she fought back tears. “that was a close one momo. we … we were almost captured…” her mind scrambled for an escape, “... by that bandit.” she looked back to the swing set and saw swaying boulders once more. the bandit stood there watching her. “c’mon, we better hurry.” casey turned and raced across the bare land leading up the entrance of the temple. when she got closer, two people emerged from the entrance so she darted into the bushes along the wall to avoid being seen. “that was close. there are guards everywhere! we need to watch our backs.” she snuck along the wall of the building and the bushes covering the front garden. when she saw the entrance was clear she came out and faced two large wooden doors. “ok momo, here we go.” she reached out and half-heartedly pulled on the heavy door. “oh no! there must be a secret code or something!” she held the lemur up as she looked around. “good eyes momo!” she took a few steps across the path and saw a post sitting on the edge of a bush. “wow, look at this insignia! a person sitting on half a circle… hmmm.” she rubbed at her chin. “it must be a symbol of the temple’s god!” she reached out and pushed the button. the doors clicked and slowly swung open. “yay! we did it!” casey raced inside the temple, heart thundering. the smell of old books and dust was a comfort to her. it felt like a welcoming hug from all her imagined friends and adventures. casey stalked through the front entrance, cautious to avoid the view of anyone who was murmuring ahead. “in order to complete our mission, we have to face the keeper of the temple.” casey squatted down beside a bench and took off her backpack. she carefully removed her precious cargo, zipped up the empty bag and swung it back over her shoulder. “stay close to me.” casey took a deep breath, stood up and walked to the front desk. it was as if a cloud had cleared from casey’s mind. suddenly she was aware of being in the library. the temple was gone, replaced by rows of wooden bookshelves piled high. people were mulling around or sitting at desks. she became aware of the noise around her, growing louder until it felt overwhelming. ahead of her was the front desk with the clerk watching her patiently. she could feel her heart pound against her ribs as true fear pinned her to the ground with the man’s clear blue gaze solely on her. her grip tightened on her stuffed animal and she tried to swallow with her dry mouth. “hello there,” said the middle aged man at the desk. “can i help you with something?” casey stood frozen to the ground, a whooshing sound filling her ears. the clerk smiled and looked down at her hands. “are you here to return those books?” he asked nicely. casey nodded stiffly, feeling every vertebrae move at the forced movement. the clerk kept smiling and reached over the desk to her. casey stepped towards him very slowly and held out her books. the clerk took them gently and read the titles. “oh, a very nice read. tomb raider is an amazing story, especially for a young girl like you. and let’s see… animals of the serengeti. another amazing find.” he fished around under his desk and pulled out two slips of paper while casey stood there frozen. her heart began to hurt at the strain. she gripped momo tighter to her chest. he stamped both slips before he opened the books and returned the paper sheet to the proper book. “there we go. you are all set little lady. would you like to pick out some more books?” casey’s eyes widened as he looked back at her. her breath quickened as she shook her head quickly then darted down the hallway, through the heavy door and back out into the parking lot. “that was a close one momo. too bad we couldn’t get more books” she hugged her toy to her chest and started walking home. “yeah, you’re right, maybe next time.” she passed the playground with the swings and the jungle gym. she walked by the big field where some kids were playing ball. finally past her neighbour’s yard where the tabby cat was still grooming itself by the tree. she walked passed the scooter she stole and up the steps but stopped when she heard her parents through the screen door. “ - wasn’t ready for this,” her mom said sternly. “she is too young, too fragile.” her dad’s deep voice was calm as he responded. “she’ll be fine. she’s probably not back yet ‘cuz she’s… hanging out in her own world. you know her.” “yes, i do know her and her worlds. i told you we can’t keep letting her read like she does if it only makes things worse. she needs friends and kids in her life!” casey kept her hand on the door handle, listening. her heart dropped to her stomach. they can’t take her books away, they are all she has. “you worry too much. she’s just a kid.” “a kid who doesn’t talk! except to that stuffed thing she lugs around everywhere. you shouldn’t have let her go off by herself.” “so you want her to be grown up enough to socialize but not walk three blocks to the library?” casey could hear her dad’s frustration growing. “i want her to be normal. to be happy.” casey peeked into the house through the screen and saw her dad hug her mom. his voice was a little muffled as he responded, “what makes you think she isn’t?” before her mom could reply, casey pulled open the screen door and rushed inside. both adults turned to her as she entered the room. she gave her parents a huge smile and ran up to them. “heya there champ!” her dad said as he leaned down for the hug she rushed at him. “did you have fun on your secret mission?” casey kept her arms around him, looked up and nodded enthusiastically. just then, barking came from the other room as a small, gray french bulldog came bounding up to casey followed by her arch nemesis. “hey twerp!” casey stuck out her chest and faced david head on, but he only smiled and scuffed up her hair. ”next time you wanna steal my scooter, maybe don’t leave it less than a block away from the scene of the crime.” david said jokingly as he went into the kitchen. casey faced her parents again then rubbed the jumping dog, pretending it was a baby rhino. “so, did you accomplish your secret mission?” her dad asked, sitting down next to her and petting the dog with her. casey looked at her dad’s smiling face, then her mom’s look of concern as a thought occurred to her. reality was really scary sometimes, but just like in her adventures, as long as you have someone there as back up- someone who believes in you - maybe everything will work out. a small smile came to her lips and she said, “yes, we did.”

Hindi

Senast uppdaterad: 2021-05-07
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym

Engelska

heer khan episode is a shocking example of a woman calling on men to commit the most heinous crimes against another woman just because the latter, in former’s own words, is a “kaafir” video-sharing platform youtube is filled with videos of hindu and muslim youths directing offensive slurs at each other’s religion, holy books, revered figures, and community members. often, youths on one side gang up to promote each other and target the other camp. they warn each other against offending their religious sentiments, or else. they take names and throw challenges. it’s a world of its own. sometimes, the videos spread to twitter. that’s when shit gets real. it’s no more between camps or the virtual world now. the state intervenes. police show up at the door with handcuffs. this week, a particularly offensive video by a woman named heer khan, from uttar pradesh’s allahabad district, made its way to twitter. khan’s video was a long, offensive rant against sita, a revered deity of hindus and wife of ram, the prince of ayodhya. the ancient indian epic ramayana records the story of rama’s exile, his quest to rescue his wife from the clutches of demon ravana, and his eventual return to ayodhya where he establishes ‘ram rajya’ or the perfect land. in the beginning of the video, khan, with her face covered with a dupatta, says her video is an answer to some hindu youtube users along with “kaafirs” in general. she begins to use choicest sexual slurs for sita, which are too explicit to be mentioned here. in between the rant, she calls ayodhya a brothel, ram, son of a prostitute and ravana, sita’s lover. the video sparked a major outrage on social media, and a hashtag demanding khan’s arrest trended for an entire day. by the evening of 25 august, an fir (first information report) had been filed against her, and she was arrested. among the charges involved against her were ipc sections 153-a (promoting enmity between different groups) and 505 (intent to incite). the outrage over the video was primarily about insult to hindu deities. social media users compared the brazen act of khan with a cartoon recently posted on facebook by a hindu man in bengaluru that was deemed insulting to mohammed, the prophet of islam, and sparked off a night of violence and rampage by muslims mobs. users pointed out that despite a lengthy video filled with horrendous comments against hindu deities, no hindu mobs went on a rampage damaging public or private property. instead, they maintained their faith in the law and order for justice and demanded that the police should throw heer khan into jail. i too was left disturbed by the video, but for additional reasons. one, i saw with horror a woman wishing the worst of sexual atrocities on another woman. two, her target, by her own admission, were ‘kaafirs’. this means she wished the sexual atrocities on other women for their religion. three, she called for the “mullahs” to carry out those atrocities. (in the video, khan says she wishes sita is raped by the mullahs and a rod inserted in her private parts). khan’s video is disturbing, yet reveals the resilience of the ideas that historically fuelled religious targeting of hindu women and continue to do so, to this day. it is disturbing that while sex crimes affect all women and all women should stand against them in solidarity, a woman herself, under certain ideological influence, can call on men to commit the most heinous crimes against another woman just because the latter is a “kaafir”. it is telling that khan calls on “mullahs”, that is muslim men learned in islamic theology and sacred law, to commit these crimes, revealing the underlying belief of religious mandate and hence, religious gratification to be obtained from such acts. it is possible that muslim women who share the extreme islamist ideology with the muslim men, facilitate the crimes against kaafir women as a proof of their commitment to the cause. ground reality shows that radical muslim women are often indeed active and willing participants in rapes and killings of kaafir women carried out by muslim men. the reverse, that is hindu women assisting hindu men in atrocities on muslim women, is unheard of. let me cite some examples: in june, the meerut police cracked a case where a hindu woman named ekta was killed and buried in the ground by a muslim man named mohammed sadiq and his family last year. among those arrested were two women. one of the women, sadiq’a bhabhi, told the media at a press conference that it was she who spiked ekta’s drink before her murder and removed her clothes after she was dead. ekta’s grieving mother could not stop herself from slapping the woman in front of the media. in july, a minor hindu girl was allegedly kidnapped by a muslim gang at gunpoint in bihar’s begusarai district. the girl was recovered after a month by the police, after sustained pressure by the national child commission. after her rescue, the girl told the court that she was kidnapped, kept in confinement and was given sedatives. the kidnappers included a woman named farat. in new delhi, a 10-year-old hindu girl was lured into going to a madrassa by a man. the girl was allegedly kept there in confinement and raped. the person who facilitated this was the man’s sister. these are just some of the examples. be it the medieval muslim rule or organised islamist groups operating today, the demographic goals that come with the dreams of a global caliphate — darul islam or ghazwa-i-hind — have translated into a tragedy of extreme proportions for kaafir women and children. the body of a hindu woman has long been the instrument of expressing the ‘might of islam’ and subjugation of hindus. in his seminal book, pakistan or the partition of india, b r ambedkar recorded some figures related to abduction of women during communal hostilities. he wrote that as per the government in 1932, a total of 568 women were reported to be abducted between 1922 and 1927 in the province of bengal. of these, 395 (or about 70 per cent) were hindus and 151 (or 26 per cent) were muslims. it is a shame that not only in pakistan and bangladesh are the hindu women openly and routinely targeted with violence, but they aren’t safe even in the only so-called hindu majority country in the subcontinent. in india, extremist groups have been given a free hand in targeting hindu women, from kashmir to kerala. also read: a look into deep historical roots of love jihad and ideological motivations behind it so, the real question is — how many more hindu women need to be abducted, abused, raped, forcibly converted, or killed, before we start fighting the ideas and ideologies behind such acts? how many victims before women rights activist, intellectuals, politicians and celebrities speak up?

Hindi

Senast uppdaterad: 2020-09-01
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym

Engelska

koyal bird-essalittle swetha was playing alone in the backyard of her house. she was feeling lonely and waited for her friends from the neighbor houses to come and play with her. suddenly she heard a beautiful song of a bird from the top of her house. she looked up and spotted a black bird there. though it was black looking something like a crow, he sang beautifully and swetha was very happy. she forgot about her loneliness in the company of the bird. as there was no sound from swetha, her mother got worried and left her job in the kitchen and came to the backyard to find out about her daughter. amazingly, she found swetha in a very happy mood engrossed in the cuckoo’s song. but when the bird saw her mother he flew away. “o mama! what a nice bird? such a beautiful song? what is the name of this bird, mama?” swetha wanted to know more about the bird, which made her happy all this time. “this bird is called cuckoo or koel. cuckoo is a small bird seen all over india. they are also found in many bird sanctuaries in india. cuckoos are also seen in australia. a cuckoo has a length of 39-46 cms," said her mother, sitting next to her daughter. by then swetha’s friends – reema and sujith - came and joined them. “mummy, tell me more about cuckoo,” demanded swetha. “okay. i’ll tell you everything about this bird. i know what all questions you will have, and i will answer them one by one. listen carefully.” “aunty, what is the zoological name of a cuckoo?” asked sujith who was a 5th standard student. "the zoological name of cuckoo is eudynamys scolopacea." “aunty, how do they look in appearance?” that was reema’s question. "a cuckoo has a long tail, pointed wings and curved bills. a cuckoo’s tail is dark gray and slightly white in colour. the crown is dark brown and the bill is pale green in colour." "how do we differentiate them whether they are males or females? asked sujith." "a male cuckoo is glistening black, with yellowish green bill and crimson eyes. they have short wings but long tail". female cuckoos are slightly smaller than the males. a female cuckoo has green beak and red eyes. the female is dark brown, with profusely spotted and barred with white. they have green beak and red eyes," said swetha's mother. “mummy, what do they eat? who gives them food?” "cuckoos are carnivorous. you may wonder what is carnivorous? it means they eat flesh" "they eat fruits, insects,caterpillars, grasshoppers, lizards, small snakes and mammals." the children looked at each other in surprise. "where do they live? do they have houses like us?" asked swetha. her mother smiled. "they live on the canopy of the trees, where they make their nests." "how do they get brothers and sisters?" reema wanted to know. "a mother cuckoo lays egg in the nest of the other bird. once the egg is hatched the chick forces the other eggs and hatchings out of the nest. the babies have dark eyes. when the chick leaves the nest it roosts in the outer branches of a tree." "a mother koel lays her eggs in the nest of a crow. after laying the eggs, the female koel flies away to the dense forests as it likes to live on big trees full of leaves to hide it. their eggs are hatched by the crow." she added. "very interesting! aunty, when is their breeding season?" asked sujith. "the breeding season of cuckoos is september to march," replied swetha's mother. "do they always sing like this?" asked swetha. "no. they usually sing in spring season because it is their mating season. the males sing such beautiful song to attract the female ones." "how sad we missed watching the cuckoo singing!" reema was disappointed. "don't worry, reema. i have a video of a cuckoo singing. watch this video. all of you come inside and i will switch the computer on," said swetha's mother. y in hindi

Hindi

हिंदी में कोयल पक्षी-निबंध

Senast uppdaterad: 2015-08-03
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym
Varning: Innehåller osynlig HTML-formatering

Engelska

fukuyama francis fukuyama from wikipedia, the free encyclopedia yoshihiro francis fukuyama image from bloggingheads.tv podcast fukuyama in 2005 born october 27, 1952 (age 63) chicago, illinois, u.s website fukuyama.stanford.edu institutions george mason university[1] johns hopkins university stanford university main interests developing nations governance international political economy nation-building and democratization strategic and security issues notable ideas end of history influences [show] yoshihiro francis fukuyama (born october 27, 1952) is an american political scientist, political economist, and author. fukuyama is known for his book the end of history and the last man (1992), which argued that the worldwide spread of liberal democracies and free market capitalism of the west and its lifestyle may signal the end point of humanity's sociocultural evolution and become the final form of human government. however, his subsequent book trust: social virtues and creation of prosperity (1995) modified his earlier position to acknowledge that culture cannot be cleanly separated from economics. fukuyama is also associated with the rise of the neoconservative movement,[2] from which he has since distanced himself.[3] fukuyama has been a senior fellow at the center on democracy, development and the rule of law at stanford university since july 2010.[4] before that, he served as a professor and director of the international development program at the school of advanced international studies of the johns hopkins university. previously, he was omer l. and nancy hirst professor of public policy at the school of public policy at george mason university.[4] he is a council member of the international forum for democratic studies founded by the national endowment for democracy and was a member of the political science department of the rand corporation.[5] contents 1 early life 2 education 3 writings 3.1 neoconservatism 3.2 fukuyama's current views 4 affiliations 5 personal life 6 see also 7 selected bibliography 7.1 scholarly works (partial list) 7.2 books 7.3 essays 8 see also 9 references 10 external links early life francis fukuyama was born in the hyde park neighborhood of chicago. his paternal grandfather fled the russo-japanese war in 1905 and started a shop on the west coast before being interned in the second world war.[6] his father, yoshio fukuyama, a second-generation japanese american, was trained as a minister in the congregational church, received a doctorate in sociology from the university of chicago, and taught religious studies.[7][8][9] his mother, toshiko kawata fukuyama, was born in kyoto, japan, and was the daughter of shiro kawata, founder of the economics department of kyoto university and first president of osaka city university.[10] francis grew up in manhattan as an only child, had little contact with japanese culture, and did not learn japanese.[7][8] his family moved to state college, pennsylvania in 1967.[10] education fukuyama received his bachelor of arts degree in classics from cornell university, where he studied political philosophy under allan bloom.[8][11] he initially pursued graduate studies in comparative literature at yale university, going to paris for six months to study under roland barthes and jacques derrida, but became disillusioned and switched to political science at harvard university.[8] there, he studied with samuel p. huntington and harvey mansfield, among others. he earned his ph.d. in political science at harvard for his thesis on soviet threats to intervene in the middle east.[8][11] in 1979, he joined the global policy think tank rand corporation.[8] fukuyama lived at the telluride house and has been affiliated with the telluride association since his undergraduate years at cornell, an education enterprise that was home to other significant leaders and intellectuals, including steven weinberg, paul wolfowitz and kathleen sullivan. fukuyama was the omer l. and nancy hirst professor of public policy in the school of public policy at george mason university from 1996 to 2000. until july 10, 2010, he was the bernard l. schwartz professor of international political economy and director of the international development program at the paul h. nitze school of advanced international studies of johns hopkins university in washington, d.c. he is now olivier nomellini senior fellow and resident in the center on democracy, development, and the rule of law at the freeman spogli institute for international studies at stanford university.[11] writings fukuyama is best known as the author of the end of history and the last man, in which he argued that the progression of human history as a struggle between ideologies is largely at an end, with the world settling on liberal democracy after the end of the cold war and the fall of the berlin wall in 1989. fukuyama predicted the eventual global triumph of political and economic liberalism: what we may be witnessing is not just the end of the cold war, or the passing of a particular period of postwar history, but the end of history as such.... that is, the end point of mankind's ideological evolution and the universalization of western liberal democracy as the final form of human government. authors like ralf dahrendorf argued in 1990 that the essay gave fukuyama his 15 minutes of fame, which will be followed by a slide into obscurity.[12][13] he continued to remain a relevant and cited public intellectual leading american communitarian amitai etzioni to declare him "one of the few enduring public intellectuals. they are often media stars who are eaten up and spat out after their 15 minutes. but he has lasted."[14] one of the main reasons for the massive criticism against the end of history was the aggressive stance that it took towards postmodernism. postmodern philosophy had, in fukuyama's opinion, undermined the ideology behind liberal democracy, leaving the western world in a potentially weaker position.[15] the fact that marxism and fascism had been proven untenable for practical use while liberal democracy still thrived was reason enough to embrace the hopeful attitude of the progressive era, as this hope for the future was what made a society worth struggling to maintain. postmodernism, which, by this time, had become embedded in the cultural consciousness, offered no hope and nothing to sustain a necessary sense of community, instead relying only on lofty intellectual premises.[16] being a work that both praised the ideals of a group that had fallen out of favor and challenged the premises of the group that had replaced them, it was bound to create some controversy. fukuyama has written a number of other books, among them trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity and our posthuman future: consequences of the biotechnology revolution. in the latter, he qualified his original "end of history" thesis, arguing that since biotechnology increasingly allows humans to control their own evolution, it may allow humans to alter human nature, thereby putting liberal democracy at risk.[17] one possible outcome could be that an altered human nature could end in radical inequality. he is a fierce enemy of transhumanism, an intellectual movement asserting that posthumanity is a desirable goal. in another work, the great disruption: human nature and the reconstruction of social order, fukuyama explores the origins of social norms, and analyses the current disruptions in the fabric of our moral traditions, which he considers as arising from a shift from the manufacturing to the information age. this shift is, he thinks, normal and will prove self-correcting, given the intrinsic human need for social norms and rules. in 2006, in america at the crossroads, fukuyama discusses the history of neoconservatism, with particular focus on its major tenets and political implications. he outlines his rationale for supporting the bush administration, as well as where he believes it has gone wrong. in 2008, fukuyama published the book falling behind: explaining the development gap between latin america and the united states, which resulted from research and a conference funded by grupo mayan to gain understanding on why latin america, once far wealthier than north america, fell behind in terms of development in only a matter of centuries. discussing this book at a 2009 conference, fukuyama outlined his belief that inequality within latin american nations is a key impediment to growth. an unequal distribution of wealth, he stated, leads to social upheaval, which then results in stunted growth.[18] neoconservatism as a key reagan administration contributor to the formulation of the reagan doctrine, fukuyama is an important figure in the rise of neoconservatism, although his works came out years after irving kristol's 1972 book crystallized neoconservatism.[19] fukuyama was active in the project for the new american century think tank starting in 1997, and as a member co-signed the organization's 1998 letter recommending that president bill clinton support iraqi insurgencies in the overthrow of then-president of iraq saddam hussein.[20] he was also among forty co-signers of william kristol's september 20, 2001 letter to president george w. bush after the september 11, 2001 attacks that suggested the u.s. not only "capture or kill osama bin laden", but also embark upon "a determined effort to remove saddam hussein from power in iraq".[21] in a new york times article from february 2006, fukuyama, in considering the ongoing iraq war, stated: "what american foreign policy needs is not a return to a narrow and cynical realism, but rather the formulation of a 'realistic wilsonianism' that better matches means to ends."[22] in regard to neoconservatism he went on to say: "what is needed now are new ideas, neither neoconservative nor realist, for how america is to relate to the rest of the world – ideas that retain the neoconservative belief in the universality of human rights, but without its illusions about the efficacy of american power and hegemony to bring these ends about."[22] fukuyama's current views fukuyama began to distance himself from the neoconservative agenda of the bush administration, citing its excessive militarism and embrace of unilateral armed intervention, particularly in the middle east. by late 2003, fukuyama had voiced his growing opposition to the iraq war[23] and called for donald rumsfeld's resignation as secretary of defense.[24] at an annual dinner of the american enterprise institute in february 2004, dick cheney and charles krauthammer declared the beginning of a unipolar era under american hegemony. "all of these people around me were cheering wildly,"[25] fukuyama remembers. he believes that the iraq war was being blundered. "all of my friends had taken leave of reality."[25] he has not spoken to paul wolfowitz (previously a good friend) since.[25] fukuyama declared he would not be voting for bush,[26] and that the bush administration had made three major mistakes:[citation needed] overstating the threat of radical islam to the us failing to foresee the fierce negative reaction to its "benevolent hegemony". from the very beginning showing a negative attitude toward the united nations and other intergovernmental organizations and not seeing that it would increase anti-americanism in other countries misjudging what was needed to bring peace in iraq and being overly optimistic about the success with which social engineering of western values could be applied to iraq and the middle east in general. fukuyama believes the us has a right to promote its own values in the world, but more along the lines of what he calls "realistic wilsonianism", with military intervention only as a last resort and only in addition to other measures. a latent military force is more likely to have an effect than actual deployment. the us spends 43% of global military spending,[27] but iraq shows there are limits to its effectiveness. the us should instead stimulate political and economic development and gain a better understanding of what happens in other countries. the best instruments are setting a good example and providing education and, in many cases, money. the secret of development, be it political or economic, is that it never comes from outsiders, but always from people in the country itself. one thing the us proved to have excelled in during the aftermath of world war ii was the formation of international institutions. a return to support for these structures would combine american power with international legitimacy. but such measures require a lot of patience. this is the central thesis of his 2006 work america at the crossroads. in a 2006 essay in the new york times magazine strongly critical of the invasion, he identified neoconservatism with leninism. he wrote that neoconservatives:[28] believed that history can be pushed along with the right application of power and will. leninism was a tragedy in its bolshevik version, and it has returned as farce when practiced by the united states. neoconservatism, as both a political symbol and a body of thought, has evolved into something i can no longer support. fukuyama announced the end of the neoconservative moment and argued for the demilitarization of the war on terrorism:[28] [w]ar is the wrong metaphor for the broader struggle, since wars are fought at full intensity and have clear beginnings and endings. meeting the jihadist challenge is more of a "long, twilight struggle" [quoting john f. kennedy's inaugural address] whose core is not a military campaign but a political contest for the hearts and minds of ordinary muslims around the world. fukuyama endorsed barack obama in the 2008 us presidential election. he states:[29] i'm voting for barack obama this november for a very simple reason. it is hard to imagine a more disastrous presidency than that of george w. bush. it was bad enough that he launched an unnecessary war and undermined the standing of the united states throughout the world in his first term. but in the waning days of his administration, he is presiding over a collapse of the american financial system and broader economy that will have consequences for years to come. as a general rule, democracies don't work well if voters do not hold political parties accountable for failure. while john mccain is trying desperately to pretend that he never had anything to do with the republican party, i think it would be a travesty to reward the republicans for failure on such a grand scale. affiliations between 2006 and 2008, fukuyama advised muammar gaddafi as part of the monitor group, a consultancy firm based in cambridge, ma.[30] in august 2005, fukuyama co-founded the american interest, a quarterly magazine devoted to the broad theme of "america in the world". he is currently chairman of the editorial board.[11] fukuyama was a member of the rand corporation's political science department from 1979 to 1980, 1983 to 1989, and 1995 to 1996. he is now a member of the board of trustees.[11] fukuyama was a member of the president's council on bioethics from 2001 to 2004.[11] fukuyama is a fellow of the world academy of art and science (waas). fukuyama is on the steering committee for the scooter libby legal defense trust.[31] fukuyama is a long-time friend of libby. they served together in the state department in the 1980s. fukuyama is a member of the board of counselors for the pyle center of northeast asian studies at the national bureau of asian research.[32] fukuyama is on the board of global financial integrity. fukuyama is on the executive board of the inter-american dialogue. personal life fukuyama is a part-time photographer. he also has a keen interest in early-american furniture, which he reproduces by hand.[33] he is keenly interested in sound recording and reproduction, saying, "these days i seem to spend as much time thinking about gear as i do analyzing politics for my day job."[25] fukuyama is married to laura holmgren, whom he met when she was a ucla graduate student after he started working for the rand corporation.[8][11] he dedicated his book trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity to her. they live in california, with their three children, julia, david, and john away in school. see also daniel bell selected bibliography scholarly works (partial list) the soviet union and iraq since 1968, rand research report, 1980 books the end of history and the last man. free press, 1992. isbn 0-02-910975-2 trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. free press, 1995. isbn 0-02-910976-0 the great disruption: human nature and the reconstitution of social order. free press. 1999. isbn 0-684-84530-x our posthuman future: consequences of the biotechnology revolution. new york, ny: farrar, straus and giroux. 2002. isbn 0-374-23643-7 state-building: governance and world order in the 21st century. ithaca, ny: cornell university press. 2004. isbn 0-8014-4292-3 america at the crossroads: democracy, power, and the neoconservative legacy. new haven, ct: yale university press. 2006. isbn 0-300-11399-4 us edition after the neo cons: where the right went wrong. london: profile books. 2006. isbn 1-86197-922-3 uk edition falling behind: explaining the development gap between latin america and the united states (editor). new york, ny: oxford university press. 2008. isbn 978-0-19-536882-6 the origins of political order. new york, ny: farrar, straus and giroux. 2011. isbn 978-1-846-68256-8 political order and political decay: from the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. new york: farrar, straus and giroux. 2014. isbn 978-0-374-22735-7 essays the end of history?, the national interest, summer 1989 women and the evolution of world politics, foreign affairs october 1998 immigrants and family values, the immigration reader 1998. isbn 1-55786-916-2 human nature and the reconstruction of social order, the atlantic monthly, may 1999 social capital and civil society, paper prepared for delivery at the international monetary fund conference on second generation reforms, october 1, 1999 the neoconservative moment, the national interest, summer 2004 after neoconservatism, the new york times magazine, february 19, 2006 supporter's voice now turns on bush, the new york times magazine, march 14, 2006 why shouldn't i change my mind?, los angeles times, april 9, 2006 the fall of america, inc. newsweek, october 13, 2008 the new nationalism and the strategic architecture of northeast asia asia policy january 2007 left out, the american interest, january 2011 is china next?, the wall street journal, march 12, 2011 the future of history; can liberal democracy survive the decline of the middle class?, foreign affairs, january/february 2012 what is governance? governance (journal), march 2013

Hindi

francis fukuyama from wikipedia, the free encyclopedia yoshihiro francis fukuyama image from bloggingheads.tv podcast fukuyama in 2005 born october 27, 1952 (age 63) chicago, illinois, u.s website fukuyama.stanford.edu institutions george mason university[1] johns hopkins university stanford university main interests developing nations governance international political economy nation-building and democratization strategic and security issues notable ideas end of history influences [show] yoshihiro francis fukuyama (born october 27, 1952) is an american political scientist, political economist, and author. fukuyama is known for his book the end of history and the last man (1992), which argued that the worldwide spread of liberal democracies and free market capitalism of the west and its lifestyle may signal the end point of humanity's sociocultural evolution and become the final form of human government. however, his subsequent book trust: social virtues and creation of prosperity (1995) modified his earlier position to acknowledge that culture cannot be cleanly separated from economics. fukuyama is also associated with the rise of the neoconservative movement,[2] from which he has since distanced himself.[3] fukuyama has been a senior fellow at the center on democracy, development and the rule of law at stanford university since july 2010.[4] before that, he served as a professor and director of the international development program at the school of advanced international studies of the johns hopkins university. previously, he was omer l. and nancy hirst professor of public policy at the school of public policy at george mason university.[4] he is a council member of the international forum for democratic studies founded by the national endowment for democracy and was a member of the political science department of the rand corporation.[5] contents 1 early life 2 education 3 writings 3.1 neoconservatism 3.2 fukuyama's current views 4 affiliations 5 personal life 6 see also 7 selected bibliography 7.1 scholarly works (partial list) 7.2 books 7.3 essays 8 see also 9 references 10 external links early life francis fukuyama was born in the hyde park neighborhood of chicago. his paternal grandfather fled the russo-japanese war in 1905 and started a shop on the west coast before being interned in the second world war.[6] his father, yoshio fukuyama, a second-generation japanese american, was trained as a minister in the congregational church, received a doctorate in sociology from the university of chicago, and taught religious studies.[7][8][9] his mother, toshiko kawata fukuyama, was born in kyoto, japan, and was the daughter of shiro kawata, founder of the economics department of kyoto university and first president of osaka city university.[10] francis grew up in manhattan as an only child, had little contact with japanese culture, and did not learn japanese.[7][8] his family moved to state college, pennsylvania in 1967.[10] education fukuyama received his bachelor of arts degree in classics from cornell university, where he studied political philosophy under allan bloom.[8][11] he initially pursued graduate studies in comparative literature at yale university, going to paris for six months to study under roland barthes and jacques derrida, but became disillusioned and switched to political science at harvard university.[8] there, he studied with samuel p. huntington and harvey mansfield, among others. he earned his ph.d. in political science at harvard for his thesis on soviet threats to intervene in the middle east.[8][11] in 1979, he joined the global policy think tank rand corporation.[8] fukuyama lived at the telluride house and has been affiliated with the telluride association since his undergraduate years at cornell, an education enterprise that was home to other significant leaders and intellectuals, including steven weinberg, paul wolfowitz and kathleen sullivan. fukuyama was the omer l. and nancy hirst professor of public policy in the school of public policy at george mason university from 1996 to 2000. until july 10, 2010, he was the bernard l. schwartz professor of international political economy and director of the international development program at the paul h. nitze school of advanced international studies of johns hopkins university in washington, d.c. he is now olivier nomellini senior fellow and resident in the center on democracy, development, and the rule of law at the freeman spogli institute for international studies at stanford university.[11] writings fukuyama is best known as the author of the end of history and the last man, in which he argued that the progression of human history as a struggle between ideologies is largely at an end, with the world settling on liberal democracy after the end of the cold war and the fall of the berlin wall in 1989. fukuyama predicted the eventual global triumph of political and economic liberalism: what we may be witnessing is not just the end of the cold war, or the passing of a particular period of postwar history, but the end of history as such.... that is, the end point of mankind's ideological evolution and the universalization of western liberal democracy as the final form of human government. authors like ralf dahrendorf argued in 1990 that the essay gave fukuyama his 15 minutes of fame, which will be followed by a slide into obscurity.[12][13] he continued to remain a relevant and cited public intellectual leading american communitarian amitai etzioni to declare him "one of the few enduring public intellectuals. they are often media stars who are eaten up and spat out after their 15 minutes. but he has lasted."[14] one of the main reasons for the massive criticism against the end of history was the aggressive stance that it took towards postmodernism. postmodern philosophy had, in fukuyama's opinion, undermined the ideology behind liberal democracy, leaving the western world in a potentially weaker position.[15] the fact that marxism and fascism had been proven untenable for practical use while liberal democracy still thrived was reason enough to embrace the hopeful attitude of the progressive era, as this hope for the future was what made a society worth struggling to maintain. postmodernism, which, by this time, had become embedded in the cultural consciousness, offered no hope and nothing to sustain a necessary sense of community, instead relying only on lofty intellectual premises.[16] being a work that both praised the ideals of a group that had fallen out of favor and challenged the premises of the group that had replaced them, it was bound to create some controversy. fukuyama has written a number of other books, among them trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity and our posthuman future: consequences of the biotechnology revolution. in the latter, he qualified his original "end of history" thesis, arguing that since biotechnology increasingly allows humans to control their own evolution, it may allow humans to alter human nature, thereby putting liberal democracy at risk.[17] one possible outcome could be that an altered human nature could end in radical inequality. he is a fierce enemy of transhumanism, an intellectual movement asserting that posthumanity is a desirable goal. in another work, the great disruption: human nature and the reconstruction of social order, fukuyama explores the origins of social norms, and analyses the current disruptions in the fabric of our moral traditions, which he considers as arising from a shift from the manufacturing to the information age. this shift is, he thinks, normal and will prove self-correcting, given the intrinsic human need for social norms and rules. in 2006, in america at the crossroads, fukuyama discusses the history of neoconservatism, with particular focus on its major tenets and political implications. he outlines his rationale for supporting the bush administration, as well as where he believes it has gone wrong. in 2008, fukuyama published the book falling behind: explaining the development gap between latin america and the united states, which resulted from research and a conference funded by grupo mayan to gain understanding on why latin america, once far wealthier than north america, fell behind in terms of development in only a matter of centuries. discussing this book at a 2009 conference, fukuyama outlined his belief that inequality within latin american nations is a key impediment to growth. an unequal distribution of wealth, he stated, leads to social upheaval, which then results in stunted growth.[18] neoconservatism as a key reagan administration contributor to the formulation of the reagan doctrine, fukuyama is an important figure in the rise of neoconservatism, although his works came out years after irving kristol's 1972 book crystallized neoconservatism.[19] fukuyama was active in the project for the new american century think tank starting in 1997, and as a member co-signed the organization's 1998 letter recommending that president bill clinton support iraqi insurgencies in the overthrow of then-president of iraq saddam hussein.[20] he was also among forty co-signers of william kristol's september 20, 2001 letter to president george w. bush after the september 11, 2001 attacks that suggested the u.s. not only "capture or kill osama bin laden", but also embark upon "a determined effort to remove saddam hussein from power in iraq".[21] in a new york times article from february 2006, fukuyama, in considering the ongoing iraq war, stated: "what american foreign policy needs is not a return to a narrow and cynical realism, but rather the formulation of a 'realistic wilsonianism' that better matches means to ends."[22] in regard to neoconservatism he went on to say: "what is needed now are new ideas, neither neoconservative nor realist, for how america is to relate to the rest of the world – ideas that retain the neoconservative belief in the universality of human rights, but without its illusions about the efficacy of american power and hegemony to bring these ends about."[22] fukuyama's current views fukuyama began to distance himself from the neoconservative agenda of the bush administration, citing its excessive militarism and embrace of unilateral armed intervention, particularly in the middle east. by late 2003, fukuyama had voiced his growing opposition to the iraq war[23] and called for donald rumsfeld's resignation as secretary of defense.[24] at an annual dinner of the american enterprise institute in february 2004, dick cheney and charles krauthammer declared the beginning of a unipolar era under american hegemony. "all of these people around me were cheering wildly,"[25] fukuyama remembers. he believes that the iraq war was being blundered. "all of my friends had taken leave of reality."[25] he has not spoken to paul wolfowitz (previously a good friend) since.[25] fukuyama declared he would not be voting for bush,[26] and that the bush administration had made three major mistakes:[citation needed] overstating the threat of radical islam to the us failing to foresee the fierce negative reaction to its "benevolent hegemony". from the very beginning showing a negative attitude toward the united nations and other intergovernmental organizations and not seeing that it would increase anti-americanism in other countries misjudging what was needed to bring peace in iraq and being overly optimistic about the success with which social engineering of western values could be applied to iraq and the middle east in general. fukuyama believes the us has a right to promote its own values in the world, but more along the lines of what he calls "realistic wilsonianism", with military intervention only as a last resort and only in addition to other measures. a latent military force is more likely to have an effect than actual deployment. the us spends 43% of global military spending,[27] but iraq shows there are limits to its effectiveness. the us should instead stimulate political and economic development and gain a better understanding of what happens in other countries. the best instruments are setting a good example and providing education and, in many cases, money. the secret of development, be it political or economic, is that it never comes from outsiders, but always from people in the country itself. one thing the us proved to have excelled in during the aftermath of world war ii was the formation of international institutions. a return to support for these structures would combine american power with international legitimacy. but such measures require a lot of patience. this is the central thesis of his 2006 work america at the crossroads. in a 2006 essay in the new york times magazine strongly critical of the invasion, he identified neoconservatism with leninism. he wrote that neoconservatives:[28] believed that history can be pushed along with the right application of power and will. leninism was a tragedy in its bolshevik version, and it has returned as farce when practiced by the united states. neoconservatism, as both a political symbol and a body of thought, has evolved into something i can no longer support. fukuyama announced the end of the neoconservative moment and argued for the demilitarization of the war on terrorism:[28] [w]ar is the wrong metaphor for the broader struggle, since wars are fought at full intensity and have clear beginnings and endings. meeting the jihadist challenge is more of a "long, twilight struggle" [quoting john f. kennedy's inaugural address] whose core is not a military campaign but a political contest for the hearts and minds of ordinary muslims around the world. fukuyama endorsed barack obama in the 2008 us presidential election. he states:[29] i'm voting for barack obama this november for a very simple reason. it is hard to imagine a more disastrous presidency than that of george w. bush. it was bad enough that he launched an unnecessary war and undermined the standing of the united states throughout the world in his first term. but in the waning days of his administration, he is presiding over a collapse of the american financial system and broader economy that will have consequences for years to come. as a general rule, democracies don't work well if voters do not hold political parties accountable for failure. while john mccain is trying desperately to pretend that he never had anything to do with the republican party, i think it would be a travesty to reward the republicans for failure on such a grand scale. affiliations between 2006 and 2008, fukuyama advised muammar gaddafi as part of the monitor group, a consultancy firm based in cambridge, ma.[30] in august 2005, fukuyama co-founded the american interest, a quarterly magazine devoted to the broad theme of "america in the world". he is currently chairman of the editorial board.[11] fukuyama was a member of the rand corporation's political science department from 1979 to 1980, 1983 to 1989, and 1995 to 1996. he is now a member of the board of trustees.[11] fukuyama was a member of the president's council on bioethics from 2001 to 2004.[11] fukuyama is a fellow of the world academy of art and science (waas). fukuyama is on the steering committee for the scooter libby legal defense trust.[31] fukuyama is a long-time friend of libby. they served together in the state department in the 1980s. fukuyama is a member of the board of counselors for the pyle center of northeast asian studies at the national bureau of asian research.[32] fukuyama is on the board of global financial integrity. fukuyama is on the executive board of the inter-american dialogue. personal life fukuyama is a part-time photographer. he also has a keen interest in early-american furniture, which he reproduces by hand.[33] he is keenly interested in sound recording and reproduction, saying, "these days i seem to spend as much time thinking about gear as i do analyzing politics for my day job."[25] fukuyama is married to laura holmgren, whom he met when she was a ucla graduate student after he started working for the rand corporation.[8][11] he dedicated his book trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity to her. they live in california, with their three children, julia, david, and john away in school. see also daniel bell selected bibliography scholarly works (partial list) the soviet union and iraq since 1968, rand research report, 1980 books the end of history and the last man. free press, 1992. isbn 0-02-910975-2 trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. free press, 1995. isbn 0-02-910976-0 the great disruption: human nature and the reconstitution of social order. free press. 1999. isbn 0-684-84530-x our posthuman future: consequences of the biotechnology revolution. new york, ny: farrar, straus and giroux. 2002. isbn 0-374-23643-7 state-building: governance and world order in the 21st century. ithaca, ny: cornell university press. 2004. isbn 0-8014-4292-3 america at the crossroads: democracy, power, and the neoconservative legacy. new haven, ct: yale university press. 2006. isbn 0-300-11399-4 us edition after the neo cons: where the right went wrong. london: profile books. 2006. isbn 1-86197-922-3 uk edition falling behind: explaining the development gap between latin america and the united states (editor). new york, ny: oxford university press. 2008. isbn 978-0-19-536882-6 the origins of political order. new york, ny: farrar, straus and giroux. 2011. isbn 978-1-846-68256-8 political order and political decay: from the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. new york: farrar, straus and giroux. 2014. isbn 978-0-374-22735-7 essays the end of history?, the national interest, summer 1989 women and the evolution of world politics, foreign affairs october 1998 immigrants and family values, the immigration reader 1998. isbn 1-55786-916-2 human nature and the reconstruction of social order, the atlantic monthly, may 1999 social capital and civil society, paper prepared for delivery at the international monetary fund conference on second generation reforms, october 1, 1999 the neoconservative moment, the national interest, summer 2004 after neoconservatism, the new york times magazine, february 19, 2006 supporter's voice now turns on bush, the new york times magazine, march 14, 2006 why shouldn't i change my mind?, los angeles times, april 9, 2006 the fall of america, inc. newsweek, october 13, 2008 the new nationalism and the strategic architecture of northeast asia asia policy january 2007 left out, the american interest, january 2011 is china next?, the wall street journal, march 12, 2011 the future of history; can liberal democracy survive the decline of the middle class?, foreign affairs, january/february 2012 what is governance? governance (journal), march 2013

Senast uppdaterad: 2016-07-05
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym
Varning: Innehåller osynlig HTML-formatering

Engelska

"you have one boon. anything you ask of me i will do." and so she went and asked him to send ram away for 14 years thinking that was a long enough time, that if you go away for 14 years, you're pretty much out of sight, out of mind.

Hindi

"आप एक वरदान है। कुछ भी आप मुझे पूछना मैं करूंगी। " और इसलिए वह चला गया और उससे पूछा 14 साल के लिए दूर राम भेजने के लिए यह सोच कर कि एक लंबे समय पर्याप्त समय था, कि यदि आप 14 साल के लिए दूर जाना है, तुम बहुत ज्यादा दृष्टि से बाहर रहे हैं, समझ के बाहर।

Senast uppdaterad: 2019-07-06
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym
Varning: Innehåller osynlig HTML-formatering

Engelska

"you have one boon. anything you ask of me i will do." and so she went and asked him to send ram away for 14 years thinking that was a long enough time, that if you go away for 14 years, you're pretty much out of sight, out of mind.

Hindi

"आप एक वरदान है। कुछ भी आप मुझे पूछना मैं करूंगी। " और इसलिए वह चला गया और उससे पूछा 14 साल के लिए दूर राम भेजने के लिए यह सोच कर कि एक लंबे समय पर्याप्त समय था, कि यदि आप 14 साल के लिए दूर जाना है, तुम बहुत ज्यादा दृष्टि से बाहर रहे हैं, समझ के बाहर।

Senast uppdaterad: 2019-07-06
Användningsfrekvens: 1
Kvalitet:

Referens: Anonym
Varning: Innehåller osynlig HTML-formatering

Få en bättre översättning med
4,401,923,520 mänskliga bidrag

Användare ber nu om hjälp:



Vi använder cookies för att förbättra din upplevelse. Genom att fortsätta besöka den här webbplatsen godkänner du vår användning av cookies. Läs mer. OK