Şunu aradınız:: appelorganet (Danca - İngilizce)

rapport fra appelorganet, punkt 318.
appellate body report para.318.

appelorganet træder sammen efter anmodning
objections from parties concerned

panelet og appelorganet fandt, at usa havde overtrådt flere wto-bestemmelser.
the panel and the appellate body found the us in violation of several wto provisions.

appelorganet i verdenshandelsorganisationen wto fremlagde for ikke længe siden sin rapport om ef-bananordningen.
the wto at the request of the usa, ecuador, guatemala, honduras and mexico, the european community went to appeal.

den 12. marts 2001 vedtog dsb rapporten fra appelorganet og rapporten fra panelet, som ændret ved appelorganets rapport.
the commission replies that the reasoned opinion and the application mention both ‘push’ and ‘pull’ methods, set out in recommendation no 2003/558, and leave the republic of lithuania the choice as to which of those methods to apply in order to implement article 26(3) of the universal service directive.

det vigtigste i denne sammenhæng er, at rapporten fra wto-appelorganet ganske enkelt ikke vedrører denne situation.
the most important point that can be made here is that the wto appellate body report simply does not concern that situation.

i øvrigt har appelorganet kritiseret, at der ikke er objektive berettigelseskriterier for den særlige ordning for bekæmpelse af fremstilling af og handel med narkotika.
and on the special arrangement to combat illegal drug production and trafficking, the appellate body criticized the lack of objective criteria for the inclusion or removal of beneficiary countries.

wto-appelorganet har med sine afgørelser i årenes løb bidraget til at opretholde denne balance, i det mindste har det været tilfældet hidtil.
the findings of the wto appellate body have contributed over the years to the maintenance of this equilibrium, at least so far.

den eneste sag for appelorganet,hvor afgørelsen gik mod det europæiske fællesskab,var en sag indbragt af peru(handelsbetegnelse for sardiner).
the only case brought before the appellate body in which the european community was not successful was the case brought by peru (trade description ofsardines).

hr. formand, ærede damer og herrer! appelorganet i verdenshandelsorganisationen wto fremlagde for ikke længe siden sin rapport om ef-bananordningen.
-( de) mr president, ladies and gentlemen, the world trade organization 's appeals panel recently presented its report on the common organization of the market for bananas.

finder appelorganet, at det ikke kan aflægge beretning inden for 30 dage, meddeler det skriftligt tvistbilæggelsesorganet grundene til forsinkelsen og angiver samtidigt inden for hvilken frist, det forventer at kunne aflægge beretning.
when the appellate body considers that it cannot provide its report within 30 days, it shall inform the dsb in writing of the reasons for the delay together with an estimate of the period within which it will submit its report.

medlemslandenes domstole får alene kompetence til at træffe afgørelse i spørgsmål om krænkelse af ef-patenter, og appelorganet tænkes at blive ef-retten i første instans.
the member states ' courts will only have jurisdiction on questions of infringement of community patents, and it is envisaged that the authority dealing with appeals will be the european court of first instance.

de europæiske fællesskaber bad appelorganet herom efter den negative afgørelse, som panelet, som wto nedsatte på anmodning fra usa, ecuador, guatemala, honduras og mexico, fremkom med.
following the negative decision of the panel which was set up by the wto at the request of the usa, ecuador, guatemala, honduras and mexico, the european community went to appeal.

appelorgan
appeal authority