İnsan çevirisi örneklerinden çeviri yapmayı öğrenmeye çalışıyor.
Profesyonel çevirmenler, işletmeler, web sayfaları ve erişimin serbest olduğu çeviri havuzlarından.
dansk rørindustri a/s v commission
dansk rørindustri a/s / commission
Son Güncelleme: 2017-04-26
Kullanım Sıklığı: 1
Kalite:
dansk rørindustri a/s v commission of the european communities
dansk rørindustri a/s / commission des communautés européennes
Son Güncelleme: 2014-02-06
Kullanım Sıklığı: 1
Kalite:
case t-21/99 dansk rørindustri a/s v commission
t-21/99 dansk rørindustri a/s / commission
Son Güncelleme: 2015-05-14
Kullanım Sıklığı: 1
Kalite:
hearing c-189/02 p dansk rørindustri v commission competition
plaidoirie c-189/02 p dansk rørindustri / commission concurrence
Son Güncelleme: 2015-05-14
Kullanım Sıklığı: 1
Kalite:
t-21/99dansk rørindustri 1,475,000 initial fine upheld
t-21/99 dansk rørindustri 1 475 000 maintien de l'amende initiale
Son Güncelleme: 2017-04-26
Kullanım Sıklığı: 1
Kalite:
dansk rørindustri and others v commission (pre-insulated pipes)
c commission (conduites précalorifugées)
Son Güncelleme: 2017-04-06
Kullanım Sıklığı: 1
Kalite:
the court of first instance held that dansk rørindustri was not part of the cartel responsible for the infringement during the period april to august 1994.
le tribunal estime que dansk rørindustri ne fait pas partie du cartel coupable de l'infraction durant la période d'avril - août 1994.
Son Güncelleme: 2017-04-26
Kullanım Sıklığı: 1
Kalite:
accordingly, it held that these two companies were not jointly and severally liable to pay the fine, liability for which must be borne by the isoplus companies alone.2 the court of first instance held that dansk rørindustri was not part of the cartel responsible for the infringement during the period april to august 1994.
4 le tribunal a décidé de ramener le montant de l'amende infligée à 65 000 000 euros, car abb n'a plus contesté sa participation à l'entente et compte tenu de sa coopération quant à la communication des preuves à la commission, après la réception de la communication des griefs.
Son Güncelleme: 2015-05-14
Kullanım Sıklığı: 1
Kalite:
(appeals by several companies seeking the annulment of the judgments of the court of first instance of 20 march 2002 concerning them, viz., respectively, the judgments in dansk rørindustri v commission (case t-21/99, [2002] ecr ii-1681), hfb holding and others v commission (case t-9/99, [2002] ecr ii-1487), ke kelit kunststoffwerk v commission (case t-17/99, [2002] ecr ii-1647), lr af 1998 v commission (case t-23/99, [2002] ecr ii-1705), brugg rohrsysteme v commission (case t-15/99, [2002] ecr ii-1613), lögstör rör v commission (case t-16/99, [2002] ecr ii-1633) and abb asea brown boveri v commission (case t-31/99, [2002] ecr ii-1881). in the contested judgments, the court of first instance had reduced the fine imposed on abb by commission decision 1999/60/ec of 21 october 1998 relating to a proceeding under article 85 of the ec treaty (iv/35.691/e-4 - pre-insulated pipe cartel) and rejected an application for annulment of that decision.
par les arrêts attaqués, le tribunal a, notamment, réduit l'amende infligée à abb par la décision 1999/60/ce de la commission, du 21 octobre 1998, relative à une procédure d'application de l'article 85 du traité ce (iv/35.691/e-4 - conduites précalorifugées) et rejeté pour l'essentiel les recours en annulation dirigés contre cette décision.] 3) dansk rørindustri a/s, isoplus fernwärmetechnik vertriebsgesellschaft mbh, isoplus fernwärmetechnik gesellschaft mbh, isoplus fernwärmetechnik gmbh, ke kelit kunststoffwerk gmbh, lr af 1998 a/s, brugg rohrsysteme gmbh, lr af 1998 (deutschland) gmbh et abb asea brown boveri ltd sont condamnées aux dépens.[ jo c 205 du 20.8.2005 ] retour en haut
Son Güncelleme: 2015-05-14
Kullanım Sıklığı: 1
Kalite: