您搜索了: minor in authority figure in action (英语 - 他加禄语)

in action
kinikilos

contraption in action
contraption sa pagkilos

geometric figure in tagalog
geometriko na pigura sa tagalog

agent of persons in authority
agent of person in authority

iput in action what i beilive in
i put in to action what i believe in

it much better if you put in action word
wala yun

action (as in 'action movie')
bakbakan

in tuitive thingking include being uncouncious or preconcious implicit, automatic in action
sa tuitive thingking isama ang pagiging uncouncious o preconcious implicit, awtomatikong sa pagkilos na may mababang pagsisikap. mabilis o awtomatikong, experientation, pabigla - bigla at ibinabahagi sa mga hayop

crisboy wishes that his own grandmother is like the figure in the popular ad while maruism is reminded by lola techie of her own mother:
isang halimbawa nito ay si jonas, kung saan pinili niyang tigilan ang pagsunod kay lola techie sa plurk dahil sa mga sumusunod na dahilan:

it's better to show in action than in words that i want you. i hope you see all my effort when i'm with you and you feel that i want you
mas maganda nang ipakita sa gawa kesa sa salita na gsto kita. sana makita mo lahat ng effort ko kapag kasama kita at maramdaman mo na mahal kita.wala torpe tayo e!

a) 1/5 = 0.20 b) 1/6 = 0.166 c) 2/11 = 0.1818 d) 11/20 = 0.55 e) 2/9 = 0.222 as you can see, the closest fraction to our result, 0.188, is 2/11, so the right choice for this question is option c). my advice considering how close are options a) and c), it would be too risky taking round figures in this exercise, e.g., 3.5 and 6 million for the population, and 56 100, 20 700 and 28 200 for the gdp per capita. besides, as in the previous exercise, we would not gain much time by doing so. on the other hand, we could also convert every option into percentage format, but note that this is not necessary at al with our original result, 0.188, so it would be a waste of our (always valuable) time. 76
region population gdp per (millions) capita (eur) brussels 1.0 56 104 wallonia 3.4 20 670 flanders 6.1 28 241 (excluding brussels) first, we can calculate the gdp of brussels, which is: 1.0 million persons * 56 104 eur/person = 56 104 million eur note that we have cleared the magnitude 'persons' in both the numerator and the denominator, in the way that we already know. then, we obtain the total gdp of belgium, by adding the gdps of every region: brussels (already calculated): 56 104 million eur wallonia: 3.4 million persons * 20 670 eur/person = 70 278 million eur flanders (excluding brussels): 6.1 million persons * 28 241 eur/person = = 172 270. 1 million eur total gdp: 56 104 + 70 278 + 172 270. 1 = 298 652. 1 million eur so now we can get the share of brussels in this total: 56 104 / 298 652. 1 = 0.188 => 18.8% in percentage format, but we do not even need it for this exercise. which is closest fraction among the available options to answer this question? apart from the first alternative, they are not very easy to calculate mentally, so you can use your calculator to make sure: 75