您搜索了: plaintiff (英语 - 马耳他语)

plaintiff
rikorrent

name(s) of plaintiff(s)
isem/ismijijet tal-attur(i)

the plaintiff sued for invasion of privacy.
l-attur fittex għal invażjoni ta’ privatezza.

however, all the other arguments of the plaintiff were rejected.
iii – il-kontroll ta’ lgħajnuna statali

the seizure by the plaintiff of property situated in the united kingdom.
(ċ) is-sekwestru mill-attur ta' propjetà li tkun tinsab fir-renju unit.

actions for misappropriation can be maintained even if the plaintiff is not personally famous.
azzjonijiet għal misapproprazzjoni tista’ tinżamm anki jekk l-attur ma jkunx personalment magħruf.

the plaintiff is able to adequately represent and protect the interests of the members of the group.
li r-rikorrent ikun f’qagħda li jirrappreżenta u jħares b’mod xieraq l-interessi tal-membri tal-grupp.

the plaintiff only takes action on behalf of the persons concerned once they have given their formal agreement.
ir-rikorrent jaġixxi f’isem persuni oħrajn biss wara li dawn ikunu tawh il-kunsens formali tagħhom.

the plaintiff alleged that he had not been informed of this policy when he opened a residential electric service account with the defendant.
l-attur allega li hu ma kienx ġie infurmat b’din l-istrateġija meta huwa kien fetaħ kont residenzjali għas-servizz ta’ l-elettriku mad-difensur.

part iv obtained as the result of the patented process of the plaintiff, if that other patent was issued before 1 january 1986.
parti iv dak miksub bħala r-riżultat tal-proċess bil-privattiva ta' min iressaq l-ilment, jekk il-privattiva loħra kienet ġiet mogħtija qabel l1 ta' jannar 1986.

following the french example, it is the state, whose economic interest is also at stake, which should act as plaintiff.
jekk jiġi segwit il-mudell franċiż, huwa l-istat, li l-interess ekonomiku tiegħu ukoll qiegħed jiġi mhedded, li jrid jaġixxi ta’ kwerelant.

the procedures thus referred to are those in which the plaintiff is not required to prove the facts, which it is for the court or competent body to investigate.
il-proċeduri hekk riferiti għalihom huma dawk illi fihom il-kwerelant ma jkunx mitlub li jipprova l-fatti, li jkun għall-qorti jew għall-korpi kompetenti li jridu jagħmlu l-investigazzjonijiet;

if neither the defendant nor the plaintiff is so domiciled or has such an establishment, such proceedings shall be brought in the courts of the member state where the office has its seat.
jekk la l-konvenut u l-anqas l-attur mhuma hekk domiċiljati u lanqas m’għandhom tali stabbiliment, dawn il-proċedimenti għandhom jinġiebu quddiem il-qrati ta’ l-istat membru fejn l-uffiċċju għandu s-sede tiegħu.

in another member state, in the case of actions brought by the policyholder, the insured or a beneficiary, in the courts for the place where the plaintiff is domiciled,
fi stat membru ieħor, fil-każ ta' azzjonijiet miġjuba minn dak li jkollu l-polza ta' assigurazzjoni, dak li jkun assigurat jew xi benefiċjarju, fil-qrati tal-post fejn l-attur ikun domiċiljat,

the limitation period shall begin to run from the day on which the plaintiff became aware, or should reasonably have become aware, of the damage, the defect and the identity of the producer.
il-perjodu ta' limitazzjoni għandu jibda jiddekorri mill-jum li fih l-attur ikun ġie konsapevoli, jew kellu raġjonevolment isir konsapevoli, mill-ħsara, id-difett u l-identità tal-produttur.

of the case.; whereas the procedures thus referred to are those in which the plaintiff is not required to prove the facts, which it is for the court or competent body to investigate.
tal-każ.; billi l-proċeduri li jissemmew huma dawk fejn il-kwerelant m’huwiex meħtieġ li jipprova l-fatti, li jridu jiġu investigati mill-qorti jew minn korp kompetenti.

in some courts, for example, in belgium, france, italy or spain, it is enough for the plaintiff to prove that the product did not fulfil the function for which it was intended.
għal ċerti ġurisdizzjonijiet, pereżempju, fi franza, il-belġju, l-italja jew fi spanja huwa biżżejjed li l-kwerelant jagħti prova li l-prodott ma kienx jissodisfa l-funzjoni li għaliha kien maħsub.

if the defendant is neither domiciled nor has an establishment in any of the member states, such proceedings shall be brought in the courts of the member state in which the plaintiff is domiciled or, if he is not domiciled in any of the member states, in which he has an establishment.
jekk il-konvenut ma jkollu la domiċilju u lanqas stabbiliment f’ebda wieħed mill-istati membri, dawn il-proċedimenti għandhom jinfetħu quddiem il-qrati ta’ l-istat membru fejn l-attur għandu d-domiċilju tiegħu jew, jekk m’għandu domiċilju f’ebda wieħed mill-istati membri, fejn huwa għandu stabbiliment.

7.2.2.2.3 this procedure also avoids administrative difficulties for both the plaintiff and the courts (the members of the group covered by the collective action make themselves known only at the end of the procedure and not in advance of the procedure).
7.2.2.2.3 tevita d-diffikultajiet ta’ ġestjoni għar-rikorrent u għall-qorti (fil-fatt il-membri tal-grupp jippreżentaw ruħhom malli tispiċċa l-proċedura u mhux qabel).