Sie suchten nach: sued (Englisch - Persisch)

being sued is not a good thing.
شكايت از بيمارستان اصلا چيز خوبي نيست

the ottomans sued for peace in december.
عثمانی‌ها در دسامبر ۱۹۱۲ خواهان صلح شدند.

sued for support by jesse vialo , seeing .
تعقيب قانوني براي خسارت توسط جس ويالو ، رويت شده توسط .

in august 2011, gainax was sued by a.d.
نام شرکت در سال ۱۹۸۵ به gainax تغییر یافت.

and you kiss the sisters arse , so you dont get sued .
و بري اونجا و منت خواهره را بکشي و دچار مشکل قانوني نشي .

that is your best case outcome when you get sued by a patent troll.
این بهترین حالتی است که می تونه براتون پیش بیاد وقتی مدعی حق انحصاری ازتون شکایت کرده.

the pa chose to join the icc and sue israel despite the risk of knowing it can be sued back by israel.
آن‌ها با علم به آنکه ممکن است اسرائیل آن‌ها را تحتِ پیگرد قرار دهد، خواهان پیگیری اقدامات اسرائیل شدند.

he sued to be allowed to run, and he won the suit, but didn't qualify by time.
او برای شرکت در المپیمک به دادگاه شکایت کرد، و در دادگاه برنده شد. اما دیگر دیر شده بود و به مسابقه نرسید.

mohammad writes that the minister of culture and youth affairs, fired a reporter and sued two other staff from balkh tv for using pure persian words while broadcasting the news.
محمد می نویسد که وزارت فرهنگ افغانستان خبرنگاری را به دلیل استفاده از واژه های فارسی از تلویزیون اخراج کرده است

however, when a man was able to open a car, he was sued by pepsi, as pepsi had made the contest impossible by not having the key for the car as a selection.
در دسامبر 2012 اعلام شد که پپسی شیرین کننده های مصنوعی پپسی رژیمی را با هدف افزایش سهم بازارش از این نوع نوشابه ها اصلاح خواهد کرد.

the united states supreme court analyzed the territorial dimension of exhaustion in keeler v. standard folding bed co. ( 1895 ) . this case involved a patent which had been assigned to different beneficiaries in different territories . the defendants had purchased a certain amount of the patent articles in michigan , where they had been manufactured by the assignees of the patent for that state , and sold them in the state of massachusetts , where the same patent had been assigned to another company . the latter sued on grounds of infringement of his rights in the state of massachusetts . a divided supreme court held that the defendants , " having purchased the patented articles in michigan from the assignee of the patent for the territory included in that state , had a right to sell them anywhere within the united states , including massachusetts , where the patent rights had been assigned to another assignee . " the reason was that the first sale had exhausted the patent rights in the entire territory of the united states : " where the patentee has not parted , by assignment , with any of his original rights , but chooses himself to make and vend a patented article of manufacture , it is obvious that a purchaser can use the article in any part of the united states , and , unless restrained by contract with the patentee , can sell or dispose of the same . it has passed outside the monopoly , and is no longer under the peculiar protection granted to patented rights . " after a review of the court " s case law , justice shiras concluded : " upon the doctrine of these cases , we think it follows that one who buys patented articles of manufacture from one authorized to sell them becomes possessed of an absolute property in such articles , unrestricted in time or place . whether a patentee may protect himself and his assignees by special contracts brought home to the purchasers is not a question before us , and upon which we express no opinion . it is , however , obvious that such a question would arise as a question of contract , and not as one under the inherent meaning and effect of the patent laws . the conclusion reached does not deprive a patentee of his just rights , because no article can be unfettered from the claim of his monopoly without paying its tribute . the inconvenience and annoyance to the public that an opposite conclusion would occasion are too obvious to require illustration . " three justices dissented . based on the same grounds invoked by the supreme court in the case in which it refused international exhaustion ( boesch v. graeff ( 1890 ) ) , the justices expressed their concern with the possibility that the majority " s opinion opened for purchasers of patented articles to enter into competition with local licensees . eventually , the patentee could assign or license his rights in all states but his own and then undersell his assignees / licensees , " drive them out of business , and utterly destroy the value of their licenses . " - exhaustion and ( regional ) market segmentation ( european union ( eu ) ) the exhaustion doctrine has been used extensively by eu courts for the main purpose of strengthening the common market implementation . the enforcement of a regional exhaustion principle was aimed at preventing segmentation of the european market into national territories . the single market is identified " as a key strategic objective for europe " and " the cornerstone of europe " s integration and sustainable growth . " it is characterized by " an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods , persons , services and capital is ensured " and " a system ensuring that competition is not distorted . " based on this objective , a regional exhaustion regime was developed as an industrial policy tool . if the owner of a national patent or trade mark were allowed to rely on his / her right to prevent parallel imports from other member states , this would not be compatible with the ban on quantitative restrictions on imports and on measures having equal effect provided in
دادگاه عالی ایالات متحده بعد سرزمینی فرسودگی را در کیلر علیه شرکت تخت تاشو استاندارد (1895) تحلیل کرد. این پرونده شامل یک حق اختراع بود که به ذینفعان مختلف در مناطق مختلف واگذار شده بود. متهمان مقدار معینی از اقلام ثبت اختراع را در میشیگان خریداری کرده بودند، جایی که توسط صاحبان حق ثبت اختراع برای آن ایالت ساخته شده بود، و آنها را در ایالت ماساچوست فروختند، جایی که همان پتنت به شرکت دیگری واگذار شده بود.