Von professionellen Übersetzern, Unternehmen, Websites und kostenlos verfügbaren Übersetzungsdatenbanken.
in the afternoon
in the afternoon
Letzte Aktualisierung: 2018-02-13
Nutzungshäufigkeit: 1
Qualität:
lauri: at 4 in the afternoon.
lauri: at 4 in the afternoon.
Letzte Aktualisierung: 2018-02-13
Nutzungshäufigkeit: 1
Qualität:
nine thirty five in the afternoon
9:35 pm
Letzte Aktualisierung: 2020-09-11
Nutzungshäufigkeit: 1
Qualität:
Referenz:
the class is at 2:00 pm in the afternoon
the class is at 2:00pm in the afternoon
Letzte Aktualisierung: 2022-06-22
Nutzungshäufigkeit: 1
Qualität:
Referenz:
it's three in the afternoon
-- what kind of girl is this?
Letzte Aktualisierung: 2018-02-13
Nutzungshäufigkeit: 1
Qualität:
Referenz:
it is twelve-thirty in the afternoon
it is twelve-thirty in the afternoon
Letzte Aktualisierung: 2024-01-30
Nutzungshäufigkeit: 2
Qualität:
Referenz:
in the afternoon, the sky will become cloudy.
in the afternoon, the sky will become cloudy.
Letzte Aktualisierung: 2018-02-13
Nutzungshäufigkeit: 1
Qualität:
Referenz:
* nine in the afternoon (acústico) video musical.
*nine in the afternoon (acoustic) pimp music video.
Letzte Aktualisierung: 2016-03-03
Nutzungshäufigkeit: 1
Qualität:
Referenz:
*"love in the afternoon", dirigida por billy wilder.
)*"love in the afternoon", directed by billy wilder, co-written by wilder with i.
Letzte Aktualisierung: 2016-03-03
Nutzungshäufigkeit: 1
Qualität:
Referenz:
Warnung: Enthält unsichtbare HTML-Formatierung
the focus of these lessons is the english related to the trip in the afternoon.
the focus of these lessons is the english related to the trip in the afternoon.
Letzte Aktualisierung: 2018-02-13
Nutzungshäufigkeit: 1
Qualität:
Referenz:
* nine in the afternoon letra en songmeanings.com* crítica de nine in the afternoon en unreality music
*nine in the afternoon lyrics on songmeanings.com*review of nine in the afternoon on unreality music
Letzte Aktualisierung: 2016-03-03
Nutzungshäufigkeit: 1
Qualität:
Referenz:
es el presentador de poletik, un informativo satírico que se emite en radio farda, así como del podcast sobre derechos humanos en irán five in the afternoon.
he is the host of poletik, a satirical news program that airs on radio farda, as well as weekly podcast on human rights in iran, five in the afternoon.
Letzte Aktualisierung: 2016-02-24
Nutzungshäufigkeit: 1
Qualität:
Referenz:
the four best teams in each region make 3 new series in the end and after three play off rounds four final teams will compete with the last two in hockeyallsvenskan for their spots in the higher league.
the two allettan winners, and the two teams that survive a three-round playoff, compete with the last two teams in hockeyallsvenskan for their spots in the higher league.
Letzte Aktualisierung: 2016-03-03
Nutzungshäufigkeit: 1
Qualität:
Referenz:
as of october 16, 2009, two russian women were ranked in the wta tour's top 10; with an additional two in the top 20.
as of october 16, 2009, two russian women were ranked in the wta tour's top 10; with an additional two in the top 20.
Letzte Aktualisierung: 2016-03-03
Nutzungshäufigkeit: 1
Qualität:
Referenz:
in the games, only four kin are said to reside in the twin worlds; two in stark and two in arcadia.
in the games, only four kin are said to reside in the twin worlds; two in stark and two in arcadia.
Letzte Aktualisierung: 2016-03-03
Nutzungshäufigkeit: 1
Qualität:
Referenz:
también incluye otro video clip llamado "wine in the afternoon" que es un b-side de "eleanor put your boots on" y que no fue incluido en el álbum pero grabado en el tour por míchigan, estados unidos.
also included is another video-clip-only single called "wine, in the afternoon" which is the b-side to "eleanor put your boots on", and was also not featured on the album, but recorded on tour in michigan.
Letzte Aktualisierung: 2016-03-03
Nutzungshäufigkeit: 1
Qualität:
Referenz:
Warnung: Enthält unsichtbare HTML-Formatierung
sessions and russia tessa berenson updated: mar 03, 2017 7:24 am hora | originally published: mar 02, 2017 attorney general jeff sessions found himself in middle of a political firestorm this week when the washington post reported that he had met twice with the russian ambassador to the u.s. during the presidential campaign, despite seeming to deny this during his confirmation hearing. lawmakers on both sides immediately jumped on sessions and called for him to recuse himself from russia investigations or resign. sessions announced thursday afternoon that he would recuse himself from investigations into president donald trump's campaign, but maintained he did not lie in his hearing and did nothing wrong in meeting with the russian ambassador. trump defended his attorney general on thursday evening, accusing democrats of waging a "total witch hunt." here are the answers to six questions about the controversy. what did the washington post report? in an article published wednesday night entitled "sessions met with russian envoy twice last year, encounters he later did not disclose," the post wrote that then-senator sessions met twice with the russian ambassador to the u.s. sergey kislyak in 2016. the paper said sessions met with kislyak once in july and once in september. what exactly did sessions say in his confirmation hearing? democratic sen. al franken of minnesota asked sessions, "cnn just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week... these documents also allegedly say quote, 'there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the russian government.'... if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the trump campaign communicated with the russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?" sessions replied, "senator franken, i'm not aware of any of those activities. i have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and i didn't have — did not have communications with the russians, and i'm unable to comment on it." what does sessions say now? "i never met with any russian officials to discuss issues of the campaign," sessions said in a statement after the post story came out. "i have no idea what this allegation is about. it is false.” sessions further elaborated thursday afternoon when he announced he would recuse himself. "let me be clear. i never had meetings with russian operatives or russian intermediaries about the trump campaign," he said. "and the idea that i was part of a quote, 'continuing exchange of information during the campaign between trump surrogates and intermediaries for the russian government' is totally false. that is the question that senator franken asked me at the hearing. i did not respond referring to the two meetings... where no such things were discussed. my reply to the question of senator franken was honest and correct as i understood it at the time." how did everyone react? democrats and republicans in congress reacted swiftly. many in both parties called on sessions to recuse himself from any investigations into russian interference in the election. others, including the top democrats in both the house and senate, have called on him to resign. president trump said he had "total" confidence in sessions, who he said "probably" told the truth in his testimony. the white house defended sessions. press secretary sean spicer briefly addressed the controversy thursday aboard air force one, telling reporters, “there’s no there there.” "he was clearly asked about his role as a campaign surrogate," spicer said, explaining session's answer in congressional testimony. “he was literally conducting himself as a u.s. senator. he didn’t do anything that wasn’t part of his job." why does this all matter? it matters because while sessions was a member of the senate's armed services committee, he was also one of president trump's top foreign policy advisors during his campaign. and trump's inner circle has for months been dogged by accusations of improper contact with russia, at the same time that russia has been accused of using cyber-attacks to meddle in the u.s. election. during his campaign, trump often praised russian president vladimir putin's leadership, and once the u.s. intelligence community concluded that russia was behind hacks on the democratic national committee, trump was reluctant to publicly accept the findings. last august, trump's campaign chairman paul manafort resigned over questions about his links to ukraine's former pro-russia regime. then just last month, trump's national security adviser michael flynn was forced to resign after it came to light that he had misled vice president mike pence about his contact with russia during the transition. in other words, this matters particularly because this is not the first instance of questionable contact between members of the trump administration and russia. what's next? republicans were largely satisfied with sessions' decision to recuse himself, and trump has stood by him. but some leading democrats are continuing to call for his resignation ingles. español
tradukka ewhat to know about jeff sessions and russia tessa berenson updated: mar 03, 2017 7:24 am hora | originally published: mar 02, 2017 attorney general jeff sessions found himself in middle of a political firestorm this week when the washington post reported that he had met twice with the russian ambassador to the u.s. during the presidential campaign, despite seeming to deny this during his confirmation hearing. lawmakers on both sides immediately jumped on sessions and called for him to recuse himself from russia investigations or resign. sessions announced thursday afternoon that he would recuse himself from investigations into president donald trump's campaign, but maintained he did not lie in his hearing and did nothing wrong in meeting with the russian ambassador. trump defended his attorney general on thursday evening, accusing democrats of waging a "total witch hunt." here are the answers to six questions about the controversy. what did the washington post report? in an article published wednesday night entitled "sessions met with russian envoy twice last year, encounters he later did not disclose," the post wrote that then-senator sessions met twice with the russian ambassador to the u.s. sergey kislyak in 2016. the paper said sessions met with kislyak once in july and once in september. what exactly did sessions say in his confirmation hearing? democratic sen. al franken of minnesota asked sessions, "cnn just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week... these documents also allegedly say quote, 'there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the russian government.'... if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the trump campaign communicated with the russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?" sessions replied, "senator franken, i'm not aware of any of those activities. i have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and i didn't have — did not have communications with the russians, and i'm unable to comment on it." what does sessions say now? "i never met with any russian officials to discuss issues of the campaign," sessions said in a statement after the post story came out. "i have no idea what this allegation is about. it is false.” sessions further elaborated thursday afternoon when he announced he would recuse himself. "let me be clear. i never had meetings with russian operatives or russian intermediaries about the trump campaign," he said. "and the idea that i was part of a quote, 'continuing exchange of information during the campaign between trump surrogates and intermediaries for the russian government' is totally false. that is the question that senator franken asked me at the hearing. i did not respond referring to the two meetings... where no such things were discussed. my reply to the question of senator franken was honest and correct as i understood it at the time." how did everyone react? democrats and republicans in congress reacted swiftly. many in both parties called on sessions to recuse himself from any investigations into russian interference in the election. others, including the top democrats in both the house and senate, have called on him to resign. president trump said he had "total" confidence in sessions, who he said "probably" told the truth in his testimony. the white house defended sessions. press secretary sean spicer briefly addressed the controversy thursday aboard air force one, telling reporters, “there’s no there there.” "he was clearly asked about his role as a campaign surrogate," spicer said, explaining session's answer in congressional testimony. “he was literally conducting himself as a u.s. senator. he didn’t do anything that wasn’t part of his job." why does this all matter? it matters because while sessions was a member of the senate's armed services committee, he was also one of president trump's top foreign policy advisors during his campaign. and trump's inner circle has for months been dogged by accusations of improper contact with russia, at the same time that russia has been accused of using cyber-attacks to meddle in the u.s. election. during his campaign, trump often praised russian president vladimir putin's leadership, and once the u.s. intelligence community concluded that russia was behind hacks on the democratic national committee, trump was reluctant to publicly accept the findings. last august, trump's campaign chairman paul manafort resigned over questions about his links to ukraine's former pro-russia regime. then just last month, trump's national security adviser michael flynn was forced to resign after it came to light that he had misled vice president mike pence about his contact with russia during the transition. in other words, this matters particularly because this is not the first instance of questionable contact between members of the trump administration and russia. what's next? republicans were largely satisfied with sessions' decision to recuse himself, and trump has stood by him. but some leading democrats are continuing to call for his resignation spañol ingles
Letzte Aktualisierung: 2017-03-05
Nutzungshäufigkeit: 1
Qualität:
Referenz:
Warnung: Enthält unsichtbare HTML-Formatierung