From professional translators, enterprises, web pages and freely available translation repositories.
landsskatteretten gav ecco medhold, hvorefter skatteministeriet indbragte denne afgørelse for vestre landsret.
as the landsskatteret upheld that appeal, the skatteministeriet appealed to the vestre landsret (western regional court).
erhvervsfinans indbragte denne afgørelse for landsskatteretten, som ved kendelse af 27. april 2001 gav selskabet medhold.
erhvervsfinans lodged an appeal against that decision before the landsskatteret (national tax tribunal) which, by order of 27 april 2001, upheld its claim.
landsskatteretten vurderede, at leasingkøretøjerne blev indkøbt med henblik på leasing for efter leasingperiodens udløb at blive solgt til tredjemand eller eventuelt leasingtager.
that tribunal found that the leased vehicles were purchased with a view to being leased and sold at the end of the leasing contract, to third parties or possibly to the lessee.
da ecco fandt, at sandalen skulle have været tariferet i kn-underposition 6403 99 33 som »fodtøj med ydersål af gummi, plast, læder eller kunstlæder og overdel af læder«, indgav selskabet en klage over den bindende tariferingsoplysning til landsskatteretten.
considering that the sandal at issue in the main proceedings should have been classified under cn subheading 6403 99 33 as ‘footwear with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of leather’, ecco lodged an appeal against the bti decision before the landsskatteret (national tax tribunal).