Results for scales translation from Dutch to English

wittenborn scales
scales, wittenborn

katz adjustment scales
adjustment scales, katz

descom scales mfg.
descom scales mfg.

(21) yamato scales co.
(21) the partial cooperator, yamato scales co.

psychiatric status rating scales
psr scales

factor construct rating scales (fcrs)
factor construct rating scales (fcrs)

de "crystal scales of justice"‑prijs
crystal scales of justice prize

op een dag wordt scales meegenomen door een volwassen draak.
"sintel" was produced by ton roosendaal, chairman of the foundation, and directed by colin levy, an artist at pixar animation studios.

swfdisplayitem - scale - - scales the object in relative coordinates.
home

: "manual for raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales.
(2003, updated 2004) "manual for raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales.

cutler werd onder vuur genomen door de brigades van edward l. thomas en alfred m. scales.
wilcox and pegram delivered a firm blow.

charles mound is gelegen in het noorden van illinois, in jo daviess county, vlak bij scales mound en 18 km ten noordoosten van galena.
(, )==rape of tamar==although he was the heir-apparent to david's throne, amnon is best remembered for the rape of his half-sister tamar, daughter of david with maachah.

de organisatie (in het kader van het forum over justitie) van de "crystal scales of justice" prijs.
organisation (in the context of the justice forum) of the crystal scales of justice prize.

) "neuroscience and the law: brain, mind and the scales of justice", new york: dana press, pp.
) "neuroscience and the law: brain, mind and the scales of justice", new york: dana press, isbn 1-932594-04-3, pp51–70.

de medewerking aan dit onderzoek was zeer beperkt (in totaal 35 eenheden of minder dan 4 % van de invoer) met slechts gedeeltelijke medewerking van twee producenten yamato scales co.
the cooperation in this investigation has been very limited (a total of 35 units or less than 4 % of imports) with only partial cooperation forthcoming from two producers, yamato scales co.

the relatively small sample size brings into question the generalisability of our findings and should therefore only be cautiously extended to young adults in other clinical settings. young adults were significantly outnumbered and made up only 25% of the total sample size. it is unclear why fewer young adults entered treatment at ehcymhs, but it may be because adolescents are generally referred to the service by parents, whilst young adults may refer themselves which can require greater autonomy and motivation. the low uptake of young adults is consistent with previous findings that they are the age group least likely to access mental health services in australia (slade et al., 2009). the relatively low numbers highlight the need for further investigation to ensure that young adults have equal access to psychiatric treatment. sdq completion rates were also notably lower for young adults (43% compared to 53%) but were particularly low for parents of young adults (37% compared with 62%). the discrepancy in parent completion rates is not surprising when considering that young adults tend to be more self-sufficient and thus not necessarily require the support of a parent to accompany them to an initial appointment. all in all, it would be of value to inspect the factors related to missing sdqs and the extent to which clinicians engage young people table 3 parent-report inter-scale correlations. inter-scale correlations adolescent sdq (n=532) young adult sdq (n=125) significance of difference emotion-conduct 0.25* 0.31* z=0.65, ns emotion-hyperactivity 0.38* 0.31* z=0.79, ns conduct- hyperactivity 0.52* 0.33* z=2.33, p=0.02 note: ns = not significant. * p ≤ 0.05. table 4 inter-rater agreement (self-report with parent-report). sdq scales adolescent sdq (n = 532) young adult sdq (n = 125) significance of difference emotional symptoms 0.36** 0.48** z=−1.45, ns conduct problems 0.50** 0.39** z=1.37, ns hyperactivity 0.39** 0.31** z=0.91, ns peer problems 0.51** 0.34** z=2.08, p=0.03 prosocial 0.33** 0.35** z=−0.23, ns impact 0.27** 0.40** z=−1.46, ns total difficulties 0.45** 0.40** z=0.61, ns note: ns=not significant; **p ≤ 0.05. p. brann et al. psychiatry research 264 (2018) 340–345 343 and their parents in the process of completing outcome measures and discussing the findings. it may also be worth pursuing other methods of administration such as the use of an electronic version of the sdq to minimise clinician's role in the data collection process and thereby limit the potential for selection bias. future studies may also wish to explore the young adult sdq alone to improve the acceptability of data
subscale