From professional translators, enterprises, web pages and freely available translation repositories.
h.e. mr. tomas novotny
h.e. mr. tomas novotny
Last Update: 2016-12-03
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
czech republic mr. vladimir novotny 7
vladimir novotny先生
Last Update: 2016-12-04
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
jaroslav novotny (represented by counsel, david strupek)
jaroslav novotny先生(由律师david strupek先生代理)
Last Update: 2016-12-04
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
s. communication no. 1778/2008, novotny v. czech republic
s. 第1778/2008号来文,novotny诉捷克共和国
Last Update: 2016-12-04
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
novotny, t. e., k. lum, e. smith, v. wang and r. barnes.
novotny te,k. lum、e. smith、v. wang和r. barnes:烟蒂和关于有害烟草废物。
Last Update: 2016-12-04
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
ivan pocuch, radim bures, adam borgula, miroslav scheinost, pavel novotny, petr havlik, milan dufek
ivan pocuch, radim bures, adam borgula, miroslav scheinost, pavel novotny, petr havlik, milan dufek
Last Update: 2016-12-03
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
1. the author of the communication is mr. jaroslav novotny, a czech national, who at the time of the events that gave rise to his communication, was serving a sentence at the prison jiřice in the czech republic.
1. 来文提交人为jaroslav novotny先生,捷克国民,在来文所涉事件发生时在捷克共和国jiřice监狱服刑。
Last Update: 2016-12-04
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
100. other claims were declared inadmissible for lack of substantiation, including in cases nos. 1079/2002 (a. et al. v. uzbekistan), 1174/2003 (minboev v. tajikistan), 1206/2003 (t.m. and s.i. v. uzbekistan), 1232/2003 (pustovalov v. russian federation), 1246/2004 (gonzalez muñoz v. guyana), 1312/2004 (latifulin v. kyrgyzstan), 1338/2005 (kaldarov v. kyrgyzstan), 1369/2005 (kulov v. kyrgyzstan), 1377/2005 (katsora v. belarus), 1401/2005 (kirpo v. tajikistan), 1425/2005 (marz v. russian federation), 1502/2006 (marinich v. belarus), 1522/2006 (n.t. v. kyrgyzstan), 1523/2006 (tiyagarajah v. sri lanka), 1537/2006 (gerashchenko v. belarus), 1544/2007 (hamida v. canada), 1555/2007 (suils ramonet v. spain), 1559/2007 (hernandez v. the philippines), 1577/2007 (usaev v. russian federation), 1616/2007 (manzano et al. v. colombia), 1618/2007 (brychta v. czech republic), 1619/2007 (pestaño v. the philippines), 1778/2008 (novotny v. czech republic) and 1869/2009 (sanjuán v. spain).
100. 因证据不足被宣布不予受理的其他案件如下:1079/2002(a.等人诉乌兹别克斯坦)、1174/2003(minboev诉塔吉克斯坦)、1206/2003(t.m.和z.i.诉乌兹别克斯坦)、1232/2003(pustovalov诉俄罗斯联邦)、1246/2004(gonzalezmuñoz诉圭亚那)、1312/2004(latifulin诉吉尔吉斯斯坦)、1338/2005(kaldarov诉吉尔吉斯斯坦)、1369/2005 (kulov 诉吉尔吉斯斯坦)、1377/2005 (katsora诉白俄罗斯)、1401/2005(kirpo诉塔吉克斯坦)、1425/2005(marz诉俄罗斯联邦)、1502/2006 (marinich诉白俄罗斯)、1522/2006(n.t.诉吉尔吉斯斯坦)、1523/2006(tiyagarajah诉斯里兰卡)、1537/2006 (gerashchenko诉白俄罗斯)、1544/2007(hamida诉加拿大)、1555/2007(suilsramonet诉西班牙)、 1559/2007 (hernandez诉菲律宾), 1577/2007 (usaev 诉俄罗斯联邦)、1616/2007(manzano等人诉哥伦比亚)、1618/2007(brychta诉捷克共和国)、1619/2007(pestaño诉菲律宾)、1778/2008(novotny诉捷克共和国) 和 1869/2009 (sanjuán 诉西班牙)。
Last Update: 2016-12-04
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality: