Trying to learn how to translate from the human translation examples.
From professional translators, enterprises, web pages and freely available translation repositories.
ecog performance status, n (%)
ecog-suorituskykystatus, n (%)
Last Update: 2017-04-26
Usage Frequency: 2
Quality:
patients with high ecog performance status
potilaat, joiden ecog-toimintakykyluokka on suuri
Last Update: 2017-04-26
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
baseline ecog performance status (ps) = 0
ecog-toimintakykyluokka lähtötilanteessa (ps) = 0
Last Update: 2017-04-26
Usage Frequency: 3
Quality:
all patients had a baseline ecog performance status of 0 or 1.
kaikkein potilaiden ecog-suorituskykyluokka oli lähtötilanteessa 0 tai 1.
Last Update: 2017-04-26
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
ecog performance status score was 0 (73%) or 1 (27%).
ecog-toimintakykypistemäärä oli 0 (73 %) tai 1 (27 %).
Last Update: 2017-04-26
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
all patients included in this study had an ecog performance status 0 or 1.
kaikkien tutkimuksen potilaiden ecog-suorituskykyluokka oli 0 tai 1.
Last Update: 2017-04-26
Usage Frequency: 5
Quality:
the majority of patients included had an ecog performance status of ≤ 1.
useimmilla potilailla ecog-suorituskykyluokka oli ≤ 1.
Last Update: 2017-04-26
Usage Frequency: 3
Quality:
baseline ecog performance status score was 0 (24%) or 1 (76%).
lähtötason ecog (eastern cooperative oncology group ) –suorituskykyluokka oli 0 (24 %) tai 1 (76 %).
Last Update: 2017-04-26
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
87% of patients enrolled had an ecog performance status score of 0-1.
87 %:lla tutkimukseen osallistuneista potilaista ecog-suorituskykyluokka oli 0-1
Last Update: 2017-04-26
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
ecog performance scores were 0 for 61% of patients and 1 for 39% of patients.
ecog-toimintakykypistemäärä oli 61 prosentilla potilaista 0 ja 39 prosentilla 1.
Last Update: 2017-04-26
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
# a total of 154 patients (ecog performance status 0 or 1) were randomized.
# yhteensä 154 potilasta (ecog suorituskykyluokka 0 tai 1) satunnaistettiin.
Last Update: 2017-04-26
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
the ecog performance status was comparable between both groups, as was the number of prior therapies.
ecog-suorituskykyluokka (eastern cooperative oncology group) oli ryhmien välillä verrannollinen, samoin olivat aikaisempien hoitojen lukumäärät.
Last Update: 2017-04-26
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
the ecog performance status was comparable between both groups, as was the number and type of prior therapies.
ecog-suorituskyky (eastern cooperative oncology group) oli samankaltainen ryhmien välillä, samoin kuin aiempien hoitojen määrä ja tyyppi.
Last Update: 2017-04-26
Usage Frequency: 7
Quality:
three hundred and ninety-six (86%) patients had a baseline ecog performance status of 0 or 1.
lähtötilanteessa 396 potilaan (86%) toimintakykyluokka oli 0 tai 1 (ecog- toimintakykyluokituksen mukaan).
Last Update: 2011-10-23
Usage Frequency: 2
Quality:
Warning: This alignment may be wrong.
Please delete it you feel so.
approximately half of the patients had an ecog performance status of 0, and half of the patients were in the low risk mskcc prognostic group.
potilaista noin puolet kuului ecog- suorituskykyluokkaan 0, ja puolet mskcc: n matalan riskin ennusteryhmään.
Last Update: 2012-04-10
Usage Frequency: 3
Quality:
demographics, including age, race, and ecog performance status (0 to 2), were balanced between the treatment arms.
hoitoryhmät olivat samankaltaiset taustatekijöiden, kuten iän, rodun ja suorituskyvyn (0-2 ecog:n mukaan) kesken.
Last Update: 2017-04-26
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
a p-value is derived from a log-rank test stratified by ecog performance status score (0-1 vs.
a p-arvo on saatu ecog-toimintakykyluokan (0–1 vs.
Last Update: 2017-04-26
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
ecog performance status, m stage, ajcc stage, gender, region and baseline ldh) might contribute to the clinical outcome.
ecog-suorituskykystatus, m-vaihe, ajcc-vaihe, sukupuoli, alue ja ldh lähtötilanteessa) voi olla merkitystä kliiniselle lopputulokselle.
Last Update: 2017-04-26
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
forty-five percent had an ecog performance status of 1, 40% had elevated ldh and 23% had a braf mutated tumour.
potilaista 45 prosentilla ecog-toimintakykyluokka oli 1, 40 prosentilla ldh-arvo oli koholla ja 23 prosentilla kasvaimessa oli braf-mutaatio.
Last Update: 2017-04-26
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
as part of the inclusion criteria, patients were required to have an eastern cooperative oncology group (ecog) performance status of 0-2.
yhtenä mukaanottokriteerinä potilaiden ecog-toimintakykyluokan (eastern cooperative oncology group) oli oltava 0–2.
Last Update: 2017-04-26
Usage Frequency: 3
Quality: