Results for exercise of brain translation from English to Gujarati

it takes a lot of brain power.
તે મગજની ઘણી શક્તિ લે છે.

this is something that humans need four years of brain development to do to remember what happened during a particular event, where it happened and when it happened.
ખાસ ઘટના દરમિયાન શું બન્યું જ્યાં તે બન્યું અને ક્યારે બન્યું તે યાદ રાખવા માટે મનુષ્યને ચાર વર્ષ મગજ વિકાસ કરવા માટે જરૂર છે આ એવી વસ્તુ છે.

retrieved 2014-09-30. ↑ "26/11 hero hemant karkare's wife dies of brain haemorrhage".
retrieved 2014-09-30. check date values in: 30 sep 2014 (help) ↑ "26/11 hero hemant karkare's wife dies of brain haemorrhage". the hindu.

now, speaking of brains and evolution at the moment, you look on the right, there's the pathway of vertebrate brain evolution, and we all have good brains.
હવે, આ ક્ષણે મગજ અને ઉત્ક્રાંતિની વાત કરીએ તો, તમે જમણી તરફ જુઓ, ત્યાં કરોડરજ્જુ મગજની ઉત્ક્રાંતિનો માર્ગ છે, અને આપણાં બધાનાં મગજ સારા છે.

unfortunately, like a dangerous opiate, this essay did a lot of brain damage to the west because it put them to sleep just at precisely the moment when china and india were waking up and the west didn't adjust and adapt.
કારણ કે તે સૂઈ ગયું છે ચોક્કસ ક્ષણ પર જ્યારે ચીન અને ભારત જાગતા હતા અને પશ્ચિમે સમાયોજિત કર્યું અને અનુકૂલન ન કર્યું. બીજી મોટી ઘટના 9/11 ની હતી, જે 2001 માં બન્યું હતું.

the supreme court held that the high court can consider a petition filed under section 482 crpc, in which the cancellation of fir has been sought, even if the chargesheet has been filed while that petition is pending.there is nothing in the words of this section which restricts the exercise of the power of the court to prevent abuse of process or miscarriage of justice only to the stage of fir.
સુપ્રીમ કોર્ટે કહ્યું કે હાઈકોર્ટ કલમ 482 crpc હેઠળ દાખલ કરવામાં આવેલી અરજી પર વિચાર કરી શકે છે, જેમાં એફઆઈઆર રદ કરવાની માંગ કરવામાં આવી હોય, ભલે તે અરજી પેન્ડિંગ હોય ત્યારે ચાર્જશીટ દાખલ કરવામાં આવી હોય. આ કલમના શબ્દોમાં કંઈ નથી. જે પ્રક્રિયાના દુરુપયોગ અથવા ન્યાયના કસુવાવડને રોકવા માટે કોર્ટની સત્તાના ઉપયોગને માત્ર એફઆઈઆરના તબક્કા સુધી મર્યાદિત કરે છે.

in the case of arnit das vs. state of bihar, 2000 (5) scc 488, while examining the binding effect of such a decision, this court observed thus:- a decision not expressed, not accompanied by reasons and not proceeding on a conscious consideration of an issue cannot be deemed to be a law declared to have a binding effect as is contemplated by article 141. that which has escaped in the judgment is not the ratio decidendi. this is the rule of sub silentio, in the technical sense when a particular point of law was not consciously determined. thus we have no difficulty in holding that by virtue of entry 54 of union list to the seventh schedule of the constitution of india, the parliament enacted the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the act) to provide for the development and regulation of mines and minerals under the control of the union. section 15 of the act provides that the state government may make rules for regulating the grant of quarry leases, mining leases or other mineral concessions in respect of minor minerals and for purposes connected therewith. in exercise of powers conferred under the aforesaid section, the government of uttar pradesh made rules called the uttar pradesh minor minerals (concession) rules, 1963 which were published in the u.p. gazette on 14.9.1963. expression minor minerals was defined under rule 2(7) of the rules which reads thus:- mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 (act no. 67 of 1957). chapter iii provides for payment of royalty and dead rent. under rule 21 of the rules, which is under chapter iii, a holder of mining lease is required to pay royalty in respect of any mineral removed by him from the leased area at the rates for the time being specified in the first schedule appended to the rules. on 25.11.1993 an amendment was made whereby granite sized dimensional stone was incorporated in item (5) of the schedule as (v). conditions of mining leases have been enumerated in chapter v and chapter vi prescribes procedure for grant of mining permit. in the original rules there were 71 rules. thereafter on 27.8.1994 by 20th amendment rules 72 to 79 were inserted in chapter viii of the rules out of which rule 72 may be referred to which reads thus:- chapter iv by way of auction/tender/auction-cum-tender when state government by special or general order declare that the area in question could be leased out by auction or by tender or by auction-cum-tender, as provided in rule 23. the procedure for grant of lease by auction is provided under rule 27. rule 24 empowers the state government to withdraw any area which had been declared under sub-rule (1) of rule 23 and once the area is withdrawn under rule 24, then the procedure prescribed in chapter ii for grant of mining lease becomes applicable. thus the procedure provided under chapter ii of the rules being the normal procedure, chapter iv is an exception to the same. it may be useful to quote rules 23 and 24 hereunder which are under chapter iv:-
તમારા langage સંપૂર્ણ સજા લખો