Results for it would be nice if we could perh... translation from English to Tagalog

it would be nice if you’re here
magiging mabuti

it would be nice to work there
limpyo kaykag trabaho

you look good but it would be better if we look good together
you look good but it would be better if we look good together

have you ever thought about what it would be like if we kissed?
naisip mo na bang humalik sa iba

i thought it would be nice to feel someone else's help
magaan sa pakiramdam na nakatulong tayo sa mga taong may kapansanan

in summary, i conclude that when we collect and gather information for the someone we want to be monitor is we should able to be patience, be observant and record all that information that we gathered weather it a small or big facts it will be very important to us to configure as well as to pattern what is their day to day activities for the someone we being monitored. additional to that, it would be better to accomplished this tasks if we trace their location first to establish our objective
sa buod, tapusin ko na kapag kinokolekta namin at tinipon ang impormasyon para sa isang taong nais nating masubaybayan ay dapat nating maging mapagpasensya, maging mapagmasid at itala ang lahat ng impormasyon na natipon natin sa panahon ito ay maliit o malaking katotohanan na ito ay magiging napaka mahalaga sa amin upang i-configure pati na rin sa pag-pattern kung ano ang kanilang mga gawain sa araw-araw para sa isang taong sinusubaybayan namin. karagdagan iyon, mas mahusay na maisakatuparan ang mga gawaing ito kung susuriin natin ang kanilang lokasyon upang maitaguyod ang aming layunin

a) 1/5 = 0.20 b) 1/6 = 0.166 c) 2/11 = 0.1818 d) 11/20 = 0.55 e) 2/9 = 0.222 as you can see, the closest fraction to our result, 0.188, is 2/11, so the right choice for this question is option c). my advice considering how close are options a) and c), it would be too risky taking round figures in this exercise, e.g., 3.5 and 6 million for the population, and 56 100, 20 700 and 28 200 for the gdp per capita. besides, as in the previous exercise, we would not gain much time by doing so. on the other hand, we could also convert every option into percentage format, but note that this is not necessary at al with our original result, 0.188, so it would be a waste of our (always valuable) time. 76
region population gdp per (millions) capita (eur) brussels 1.0 56 104 wallonia 3.4 20 670 flanders 6.1 28 241 (excluding brussels) first, we can calculate the gdp of brussels, which is: 1.0 million persons * 56 104 eur/person = 56 104 million eur note that we have cleared the magnitude 'persons' in both the numerator and the denominator, in the way that we already know. then, we obtain the total gdp of belgium, by adding the gdps of every region: brussels (already calculated): 56 104 million eur wallonia: 3.4 million persons * 20 670 eur/person = 70 278 million eur flanders (excluding brussels): 6.1 million persons * 28 241 eur/person = = 172 270. 1 million eur total gdp: 56 104 + 70 278 + 172 270. 1 = 298 652. 1 million eur so now we can get the share of brussels in this total: 56 104 / 298 652. 1 = 0.188 => 18.8% in percentage format, but we do not even need it for this exercise. which is closest fraction among the available options to answer this question? apart from the first alternative, they are not very easy to calculate mentally, so you can use your calculator to make sure: 75