Results for methodological translation from Greek to French

biostatistical/ methodological issues:
pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the transmis pour consultation en décembre 1999 development of antibacterial medicinal products

points to consider on biostatistical/ methodological issues arising from cpmp discussion on licensing applications:
points to consider on biostatistical/ methodological issues arising from cpmp discussion on licensing applications:

concept paper on the development of a cpmp points to consider on methodological issues in confirmatory clinical trials with flexible design and analysis plan.
concept paper on the development of a cpmp points to consider on methodological issues in confirmatory clinical trials with flexible design and analysis plan.

investigation of medicinal products in the treatment of asthma concept paper on the development of a cpmp points to consider on biostatistical/ methodological issues arising
1 note for guidance on evaluation of anticancer medicinal products in man transmise pour consultation en juillet 2000 avec extension en septembre 2000 de deux mois supplémentaires

adjustment for multiplicity and related topics points to consider on biostatistical/ methodological issues arising from cpmp discussion on licensing applications:
adjustment for multiplicity and related topics points to consider on biostatistical/ methodological issues arising from cpmp discussion on licensing applications:

choice of non- inferiority margin points to consider on biostatistical/ methodological issues arising from cpmp discussion on licensing applications:
choice of non-inferiority margin points to consider on biostatistical/ methodological issues arising from cpmp discussion on licensing applications:

eurostat , « methodological manual for statistics on credit institutions » , έκδοση 1.8 , Δεκέμßριος 2001 , σ . 34 .
voir eurostat , methodological manual for statistics on credit institutions ( manuel méthodologique de statistique portant sur les établissements de crédit ) , version 1.8 , décembre 2001 , p. 34 .

eurostat , « methodological manual for statistics on credit institutions » , έκδοση 1.8 , Δεκέμßριος 2001 , σ . 11 και σ .
voir eurostat , methodological manual for statistics on credit institutions ( manuel méthodologique de statistiques portant sur les établissements de crédit ) , version 1.8 , décembre 2001 , pp. 11 et 23 .

methodological remarks: the starting point in the year 2000 is set in the graph as zero and the 2010 benchmark as 100. the results achieved in each year are thus measured against the 2010 benchmark. a diagonal line shows the progress required, i.e. each year an additional 10% of progress would have to be achieved to reach the benchmark. if a line stays below this diagonal line, progress is not sufficient.as regards lifelong learning participation, there have been many breaks in time series: some countries have revised their data collection methods between 2002 and 2003. the application of the new methods led to higher results from 2003, and thus progress is overstated between 2002 and 2003. the line 2002-2003 on lifelong learning participation is therefore dotted. for low achievers in reading (data from pisa survey) there are only results for 16 eu countries and for two years.
il est donc particulièrement inquiétant que, bien que le benchmark que l’ue s’était fixé concernant l’augmentation du nombre de diplômés de l’enseignement supérieur en mathématiques, sciences et technologies ait été rapidement atteint, on observe trop peu de progrès par rapport aux benchmarks les plus étroitement liés à l’inclusion sociale. À moins que des efforts nettement plus importants ne soient consentis en ce qui concerne les abandons scolaires prématurés, l’achèvement de l’enseignement secondaire supérieur et les compétences clés, une plus grande part de la prochaine génération sera confrontée à l’exclusion sociale, ce qui se fera à grands frais pour les premiers intéressés, l’économie et la société. lorsque le conseil européen a adopté le pacte européen pour la jeunesse en mars 2005, il a souligné l’importance particulière que les aspects en question du programme « Éducation et formation 2010 » revêtent pour les jeunes.