Results for repsol translation from Latvian to English

saskaņā ar “repsol”:
according to repsol:

repsol investigaciones petrolíferas, s.a.
repsol investigaciones petrolíferas, s.a.

“repsol” kā iespējamā atbalsta saņēmēja stāvoklis
the position of repsol as a potential beneficiary of the aid

saistību lēmumi fa premier league un repsol lietās,
the commitment decisions in the fa premier league repsol and cannes extension agreement cases (see ,

piedāvāto saistību izpildi pārrauga repsol iecelta pilnvarota persona.
the implementation of the proposed commitments would be monitored by a trustee appointed by repsol.

(lieta comp/b-1/38.348 – repsol cpp)
(case comp/b-1/38.348 — repsol cpp)

general química sa, solidāri un atsevišķi ar repsol química sa un repsol ypf sa
general química sa, jointly and severally with repsol química sa and repsol ypf sa

spānijas apsvērumi sakrita ar minētajiem argumentiem attiecībā uz “repsol” nostāju.
the submission from spain concurred with the above arguments as regards the position of repsol.

komisijas atbildes uz šiem 6 lūgumiem lielā mērā balstījās uz tās pagaidu novērtējumu repsol cpp lietā108.
the commission’s replies to these 6 requests were largely based on its preliminary assessment in the repsol cpp case108.

komisija uzskata, ka repsol cpp piedāvātās saistības ir pietiekamas, lai novērstu identificētās bažas par konkurenci.
the commission considers that the commitments offered by repsol cpp are sufficient to address the identified competition concerns.

turklāt repsol cpp apņemas atturēties no tādu neatkarīgu dodo degvielas uzpildes staciju pirkšanas, kurām tas neveic piegādi.
further, repsol cpp undertakes to refrain from buying independent dodo stations that it is not supplying.

lēmums nosaka, ka, ņemot vērā saistības, kas uzliktas repsol cpp, komisijas rīcībai vairs nav pamata.
the decision finds, in view of the commitments made binding on repsol cpp, that there are no longer grounds for action by the commission.

2003. gada oktobrī un 2004. gada februārī komisija saņēma vienas ieinteresētās puses (“repsol”) apsvērumus.
the commission received comments from one interested party (repsol) in october 2003 and february 2004.

procedūras priekšmets ir degvielas piegāde degvielas uzpildes stacijām spānijā, kā arī repsol cpp un degvielas uzpildes staciju ilgtermiņa ekskluzīvo piegādes līgumu slēgšana.
the subject matter of the procedure is the supply of fuel to service stations in spain and the conclusion, by repsol cpp, of long-term exclusive supply agreements with service stations.

jo īpaši repsol cpp apņemas piedāvāt attiecīgajām degvielas uzpildes stacijām noteiktu finanšu stimulu spēkā esošo ilgtermiņa piegādes līgumu izbeigšanai un turpmāk atturēties noslēgt ilgtermiņa ekskluzivitātes līgumus.
in particular, repsol cpp undertakes to offer to service stations concerned a concrete financial incentive to terminate the existing long-term supply agreements and to refrain from concluding further long-term exclusivity agreements.

garantijas attiecās uz “repsol” kā kreditora stāvokli attiecībā pret kuģa īpašniekiem, “izar” un kuģu būvētavām.
the guarantees corresponded to repsol’s creditor position vis-à-vis the shipowners, izar and the shipyards.

“sepi” garantijas attiecās uz to, uz ko “repsol” bija tiesības saskaņā ar spānijas civiltiesībām un komerctiesībām.
the guarantees from sepi covered benefits to which repsol was entitled under spanish civil and commercial law.

lai gan repsol ypf sa un repsol quimica sa paši nav piedalījušies minētajos pārkāpumos, šie uzņēmumi tomēr ir saukti pie atbildības par to 100 % īpašumā esošā meitasuzņēmuma general quimica uzvedību.
repsol ypf sa and repsol quimica sa, although they did not themselves participate in the arrangements in question, are nevertheless held responsible for the conduct of their wholly owned subsidiary general quimica.

savos apsvērumos “repsol” norāda, ka ir jānošķir tā stāvoklis kā līgumā noteikto garantiju saņēmējam un jebkāds iespējams labums, kas izriet no valsts atbalsta.
in its observations, repsol insists on the distinction that must be drawn between its position as contractual beneficiary of the guarantees, and any alleged benefits deriving from the state aid.

1999. gadā “repsol” trijiem kuģu īpašniekiem piešķīra katram vienu gāzes transportkuģa fraktēšanas līgumu ar papildlīguma iespēju uz tankkuģi katram īpašniekam saskaņā ar “pagaidu fraktēšana” sistēmu ilgtermiņā.
in 1999, repsol awarded three shipowners one contract each for the chartering of one lng tanker each, plus the option for one extra tanker each, under a long-term time-charter arrangement.