Results for technologically translation from Portuguese to English

Portuguese

Translate

technologically

Translate

English

Translate
Translate

Instantly translate texts, documents and voice with Lara

Translate now

Human contributions

From professional translators, enterprises, web pages and freely available translation repositories.

Add a translation

Portuguese

English

Info

Portuguese

o mundo em torno de nós é avançado technologically.

English

the world around us is technologically advanced.

Last Update: 2018-02-13
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Portuguese

mas o segundo estágio era muito mais caro e sofisticado technologically do que o primeiro.

English

but the second stage was much more expensive and technologically sophisticated than the first.

Last Update: 2018-02-13
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Portuguese

além disso, o mais technologically os produtos avançados carregam com sua compra um compromisso implicado do momento do purchaser de adquirir o conhecimento para seu uso apropriado.

English

furthermore, most technologically advanced products carry with their purchase an implied commitment of the purchaser’s time to acquire knowledge for their proper use.

Last Update: 2018-02-13
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Portuguese

it was agreed that modern education is the missing catalyst in the arab world, a situation which must be corrected at all levels and completely overhauled should we wish to be part of this technologically advanced era.

English

it was agreed that modern education is the missing catalyst in the arab world, a situation which must be corrected at all levels and completely overhauled should we wish to be part of this technologically advanced era.

Last Update: 2016-02-24
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Portuguese

em uma variedade larga de campos técnicos china de 300 bce era muitos séculos antes de europa e o oriente médio. e que aconteceu a china que stagnated technologically de modo que pelo décimo nono século fosse assim distante atrás do oeste que era fraco e primitivo?

English

in a wide variety of technical fields china of 300 bce was many centuries ahead of europe and the middle east. and what happened to china that it stagnated technologically so that by the nineteenth century it was so far behind the west that it was weak and primitive?

Last Update: 2018-02-13
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Portuguese

googowe’ve been involved into live cams for over a decade now, in more ways than one. we were excited when the first cam sites starting showing up around the web. we all remember ifriends, right? i’m not 100% sure that was the first cam site ever, but it was definitely one of the ones that started it all. whatever the name of the sites, they weren’t great, at least not by today’s standards. the video connection was lagging at best and the design and features…well let’s just say the idea behind it was great, everything else…not so much. of course, they were limited by the technology available at that time. as with everything today, the more we develop technologically the better the service gets. it was just a matter of time until other cam sex sites started popping up around the web. back in the early days, camcontacts was another very popular destination for cam users. just like i mentioned in our review of the site, their service hasn’t really changed all that much during this time. for me at least, it’s hard to believe a site can maintain its basic layout and features for this long. i believe things really started evolving once livejasmin made its entrance. it wasn’t much of a cam site at the beginning, but somehow they managed to raise the bar during the years and developed, at least from our point of view, one of the best live sex sites out there, maybe the best. compared to most of their competition, they are years ahead if we look at the amount of online models, models’ gallery quality and most importantly the site’s speed and that of their live video feeds. of course, there are other great sites out there, some of them with more exciting features and probably more gorgeous models. streamate powered sites are a great example of that. the site is packed with a lot of cool features and rivals livejasmin in speed and video connection quality. the problem with these types of sites is that they are pretty expensive. most of them, including fapshows and imlive have one main way of interacting with the cam models and that is by going into a private chat. sure, free chat is available with almost all these sites, but that’s mainly to attest that the cam girl you’re watching is really the one you’re looking for. most webcam girls will not really sustain a conversation during the free chat and will certainly not reveal any kind of nudity. so if you’re hoping for pornhub like hardcore action during a free chat session on one of these sites, forget about it, it won’t happen. private chat is the way to go here, if you can afford it. how much does it cost? depends on the site and the girl you’re looking to hook up with, but it’s usually anywhere between $0.99 usd and $4.99 usd per minute. that would make an average cam session cost about $3 usd per minute. let’s say you get chatty and spend about 2 hours in a private chat at this rate, that would be $360 usd. not cheap, is it?

English

googwe’ve been involved into live cams for over a decade now, in more ways than one. we were excited when the first cam sites starting showing up around the web. we all remember ifriends, right? i’m not 100% sure that was the first cam site ever, but it was definitely one of the ones that started it all. whatever the name of the sites, they weren’t great, at least not by today’s standards. the video connection was lagging at best and the design and features…well let’s just say the idea behind it was great, everything else…not so much. of course, they were limited by the technology available at that time. as with everything today, the more we develop technologically the better the service gets. it was just a matter of time until other cam sex sites started popping up around the web. back in the early days, camcontacts was another very popular destination for cam users. just like i mentioned in our review of the site, their service hasn’t really changed all that much during this time. for me at least, it’s hard to believe a site can maintain its basic layout and features for this long. i believe things really started evolving once livejasmin made its entrance. it wasn’t much of a cam site at the beginning, but somehow they managed to raise the bar during the years and developed, at least from our point of view, one of the best live sex sites out there, maybe the best. compared to most of their competition, they are years ahead if we look at the amount of online models, models’ gallery quality and most importantly the site’s speed and that of their live video feeds. of course, there are other great sites out there, some of them with more exciting features and probably more gorgeous models. streamate powered sites are a great example of that. the site is packed with a lot of cool features and rivals livejasmin in speed and video connection quality. the problem with these types of sites is that they are pretty expensive. most of them, including fapshows and imlive have one main way of interacting with the cam models and that is by going into a private chat. sure, free chat is available with almost all these sites, but that’s mainly to attest that the cam girl you’re watching is really the one you’re looking for. most webcam girls will not really sustain a conversation during the free chat and will certainly not reveal any kind of nudity. so if you’re hoping for pornhub like hardcore action during a free chat session on one of these sites, forget about it, it won’t happen. private chat is the way to go here, if you can afford it. how much does it cost? depends on the site and the girl you’re looking to hook up with, but it’s usually anywhere between $0.99 usd and $4.99 usd per minute. that would make an average cam session cost about $3 usd per minute. let’s say you get chatty and spend about 2 hours in a private chat at this rate, that would be $360 usd. not cheap, is it?

Last Update: 2016-07-19
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:

Reference: Anonymous

Get a better translation with
10,198,868,218 human contributions

Users are now asking for help:



We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more. OK