From professional translators, enterprises, web pages and freely available translation repositories.
pe mine nu ma deranjeaza foarte mult, ca rationamentul darwinist asupra compasiunii e interesul propriu, la nivel genetic.
this doesn't bother me so much, that the underlying darwinian rationale of compassion is kind of self-serving at the genetic level.
in principiu, acesta este rationamentul economiei keynes-iene, care spune ca guvernele au un rol de jucat in managementul macroeconomic prin instrumente ale politicii economice: cursul de schimb si politica bugetara.
this, basically, is the logic of keynesian economics, which says that governments have a role to play in macro-economic management through policy tools: monetary exchange rate and budget policy.
de aceea, discutia despre libertatile individuale versus siguranta nationala – care, în fond, este o discutie despre cetatean versus patrie – este una fara sens, absurda, e o falsa dilema, care nu avea cum sa-si gaseasca o rezolvare clara. aici e vorba nu de o dilema, ci de un rationament viciat.
therefore, the discussion about individual freedom versus national security – who, in fact, is a discussion about citizens versus state – is meaningless, absurd, is a false dilemma, and cannot have a clear solution. it's not a dilemma, it's a wrong judgement.