Results for does facebook dating have read re... translation from Spanish to English

randie j stewart facebook dating (stewie)
randie j stewart facebook dating (stewie)

i suppose you have read the paper.
i suppose you have read the paper.

i have read and accepted the use conditions.
i have read and accepted the use conditions.

i have read and accept the terms and conditions.
i have read and accept the terms and conditions.

it is easily one of the best fantasy novels i have read.
it is easily one of the best fantasy novels i have read.

in order to understand fully chapter 5 , it is necessary to have read chapter 3 and , in detail .
in order to understand fully chapter 5 , it is necessary to have read chapter 3 and , in detail .

la letra dice: ..."i must have read a while, the latest one by marilyn french or something in that style.
the lyric says ..."i must have read a while, the latest one by marilyn french or something in that style".

first, we can 'black out' the rows on the countries that are irrelevant to us: patents applications (per million habitants) 2017 population 2016 2017 2018 2019 (thousands) luxembourg 590 651 674 622 655 now, we should obtain the population figure in 2016 and 2019. this is not difficult, if you have read well the statement. at this point, i would like to remind our reader that, quite often (as we have already seen in several examples), epso numerical reasoning questions include in their statement not only the 'question asked' but aiso essential information or new data, apart from those contained in tables and charts, that you will also need to do your calculations. it is not rare that, when the candidate is too focused in analysing and performing arithmetic with many figures from the tables and graphics -in the heat battle the test and time-, he/she may forget or miss an important data from the statement, so please be aware of this potential mistake. so, having the 2017 population, 590 thousands, and knowing that there is an increase of 12 thousands per year (we should work with the same unit and it is faster here to skip the zeroes), we can get that: population in 2016 (1 year before) was 590 - 12 = 578 thousands - population in 2019 (2 years later) was 590 - (12 * 2) = 614 thousands 60
excuse me just