Vous avez cherché: drainage of human (Anglais - Cingalais)

Anglais

Traduction

drainage of human

Traduction

Cingalais

Traduction
Traduction

Traduisez instantanément des textes, des documents et des voix avec Lara

Traduire maintenant

Contributions humaines

Réalisées par des traducteurs professionnels, des entreprises, des pages web ou traductions disponibles gratuitement.

Ajouter une traduction

Anglais

Cingalais

Infos

Anglais

the hot type of human?

Cingalais

සරාගී විදියේ මිනිස්සුන්ටද?

Dernière mise à jour : 2016-10-27
Fréquence d'utilisation : 1
Qualité :

Anglais

as a student of human behavior,

Cingalais

මනුශ්‍ය හැසිරීම ගැන අධ්‍යයනය කරන සිසුවෙක් හැටියට,

Dernière mise à jour : 2016-10-27
Fréquence d'utilisation : 1
Qualité :

Anglais

and the full spectrum of human emotion.

Cingalais

ඒවගේම හැම මිනිස් හැඟීමකටම.

Dernière mise à jour : 2016-10-27
Fréquence d'utilisation : 1
Qualité :

Anglais

we're the next stage of human evolution.

Cingalais

අපි තමයි මනුෂ්‍යාෙග් ඊලග පරිනාමය.

Dernière mise à jour : 2016-10-27
Fréquence d'utilisation : 1
Qualité :

Anglais

wanna know what kind of human being i am?

Cingalais

ඕනද මගේ මොන වගේ මනුස්සකමක්ද තියෙන්නෙ බලන්න?

Dernière mise à jour : 2016-10-27
Fréquence d'utilisation : 1
Qualité :

Anglais

it can't understand the value of human life.

Cingalais

මට මිනිස් ජීවිත තෙරෙන් නෑ.

Dernière mise à jour : 2016-10-27
Fréquence d'utilisation : 1
Qualité :

Anglais

i'm sure if you're attracted to that sort of human

Cingalais

මට විශ්වාසයි ඔයා නම් ඒ වගේ මිනිස්සුන්ට වහ වැටිලා ඉන්නවනම්, එතකොට... ..

Dernière mise à jour : 2016-10-27
Fréquence d'utilisation : 1
Qualité :

Anglais

how to get a viable amount of human life off the planet?

Cingalais

කොහොමද සෑහෙන මනුෂ්‍යන් සංඛ්‍යාවක් මෙහෙන් ගෙනියන්නෙ?

Dernière mise à jour : 2016-10-27
Fréquence d'utilisation : 1
Qualité :

Anglais

sir, i complained about the murder of human rights officer to mallikarjuna rao

Cingalais

සර්, මම පැමිනිලි කලේ මිනිස් අයිතිවාසිකම් නිලධාරි මාලිකාජුනා රාඕගෙ මිනීමැරුම ගැන

Dernière mise à jour : 2016-10-27
Fréquence d'utilisation : 1
Qualité :

Anglais

what is the lives of a few people, compared to the whole of human history?

Cingalais

මිනිස්සු අතලොස්සකගේ ජීවිත බේරගෙන මොකටද? , මිනිස් ඉතිහාසය සම්පූර්නයෙන්ම විනාශ වෙද්දී

Dernière mise à jour : 2016-10-27
Fréquence d'utilisation : 1
Qualité :

Anglais

yes. books are best friends of humans.

Cingalais

ඔව්, පොත් කියන්නේ මිනිස්සුන්ගේ හොඳම යාළුවා.

Dernière mise à jour : 2016-10-27
Fréquence d'utilisation : 1
Qualité :

Anglais

i often felt a sort of envy of humans of that thing they called spirit.

Cingalais

මං බොහෝවිට දැනෙනවා හැම මිනිහකේගමෙ මෘදුබව... ඒ හැමදේටම ඔවුන් කිව්වේ ආත්මය කියලා.

Dernière mise à jour : 2016-10-27
Fréquence d'utilisation : 1
Qualité :

Anglais

and unraveling the complex chain of events that can turn a triumph of human innovation into a smoldering pile of wreckage in seconds-- well, i can't think of a more compelling application than that.

Cingalais

සිද්ධි දාමයක සම්බන්ධය හොයාගන්නත් පුලුවන් ඒකෙන් අලුත් යමක් හොයාගන්න පුලුවන් හරියට තත්පරේකින්

Dernière mise à jour : 2016-10-27
Fréquence d'utilisation : 1
Qualité :

Anglais

this step is sanctioned by a very weak indifference principle. let us distinguish two cases. the first case, which is the easiest, is where all the minds in question are like your own in the sense that they are exactly qualitatively identical to yours: they have exactly the same information and the same experiences that you have. the second case is where the minds are “like” each other only in the loose sense of being the sort of minds that are typical of human creatures, but they are qualitatively distinct from one another and each has a distinct set of experiences. i maintain that even in the latter case, where the minds are qualitatively different, the simulation argument still works, provided that you have no information that bears on the question of which of the various minds are simulated and which are implemented biologically. a detailed defense of a stronger principle, which implies the above stance for both cases as trivial special instances, has been given in the literature.11 space does not permit a recapitulation of that defense here, but we can bring out one of the underlying intuitions by bringing to our attention to an analogous situation of a more familiar kind. suppose that x% of the population has a certain genetic sequence s within the part of their dna commonly designated as “junk dna”. suppose, further, that there are no manifestations of s (short of what would turn up in a gene assay) and that there are no known correlations between having s and any observable characteristic. then, quite clearly, unless you have had your dna sequenced, it is rational to assign a credence of x% to the hypothesis that you have s. and this is so quite irrespective of the fact that the people who have s have qualitatively different minds and experiences from the people who don’t have s. (they are different simply because all humans have different experiences from one another, not because of any known link between s and what kind of experiences one has.) the same reasoning holds if s is not the property of having a certain genetic sequence but instead the property of being in a simulation, assuming only that we have no information that enables us to predict any differences between the experiences of simulated minds and those of the original biological minds. it should be stressed that the bland indifference principle expressed by (#) prescribes indifference only between hypotheses about which observer you are, when you have no information about which of these observers you are.

Cingalais

සිරස්තලයක් එක් කරන්න

Dernière mise à jour : 2022-12-31
Fréquence d'utilisation : 1
Qualité :

Référence: Anonyme

Obtenez une traduction de meilleure qualité grâce aux
8,934,690,722 contributions humaines

Les utilisateurs demandent maintenant de l'aide :



Nous utilisons des cookies pour améliorer votre expérience utilisateur sur notre site. En poursuivant votre navigation, vous déclarez accepter leur utilisation. En savoir plus. OK