Vous avez cherché: eden jayloni (Anglais - Tagalog)

eden
paraiso

our eden lost
edeng maligayang sa ami'y pumanaw

garden of eden
eden

the garden of eden
ano tanim mo sa farm

ibagam manang m pasensya imbagak met eden knyam medyo agaburido ako talga
ibagam manang m pasensya imbagak met eden knyam medyo agaburido ako talgaibagam manang m pasensyan,imbagak met iden knyam medyu agaburido ak tlga,

enchanting eden notes that becaks are being replaced by modern vehicles:
ngayon ginagamit na lang yun mga motor parang yun tuk-tuk sa thailand.

hi eden i keep calling u. waray ak mkatawag ha im last night didi ky nkadi akon padis gintatago ko la ha iya ky mkupit la ako igbarayad tak anak. diri ako mka send ha im kun diri anay kita mgkaistorya kadali la.
hi eden i keep calling u. waray ak mkatawag ha im last night didi ky nkadi akon padis gintatago ko la ha iya ky mkupit la ako igbarayad tak anak. diri ako mka send ha im kun diri anay kita mgkaistorya kadali la.

now that restorative justice has raised her gaian ecological purpose, to restore multiculturing peace in polyphonic polypathic turquoise eden, how do you continue to justify a win/lose retributive justice evolutionary philosophy of law and moral order as contributing to healthy win/win regeneratively revolutionary democracy? asked the ecosystemic judge of unitingnations jurisdiction. restorative justice was never intended to be effective where either victims or predators are unwilling, often incapable, of re-engaging in cooperative interdependent win/win dialogue, egalitarian discernment in-between trust and mistrust and hostile distrust and restorative retrust. so you argue win/win regenerative assumptions of natural/spiritual creatures are not safely, and not realistically, accessible for all the healing dreams and purposes endemic to our gaian muse of justice? an insufficiency of experience with healthy democratic peace; yes. and, how will continuing to primally rely on win/lose retribution, where victims and a healthy society are presumed to win by punishing criminals and loser scofflaws, lead us toward this noble, and globally multicultural, goal of achieving healthy democratic peace for all earth's regenerative creatures? retributive justice is the state's weapon to protect the common good from further injustice, a deterring threat; not a tool or medicine toward an actively remediating peace, domestic or international, private or public resonant health.
now that restorative justice has raised her gaian ecological purpose, to restore multiculturing peace in polyphonic polypathic turquoise eden, how do you continue to justify a win/lose retributive justice evolutionary philosophy of law and moral order as contributing to healthy win/win regeneratively revolutionary democracy? asked the ecosystemic judge of unitingnations jurisdiction. restorative justice was never intended to be effective where either victims or predators are unwilling, often incapable, of re-engaging in cooperative interdependent win/win dialogue, egalitarian discernment in-between trust and mistrust and hostile distrust and restorative retrust. so you argue win/win regenerative assumptions of natural/spiritual creatures are not safely, and not realistically, accessible for all the healing dreams and purposes endemic to our gaian muse of justice? an insufficiency of experience with healthy democratic peace; yes. and, how will continuing to primally rely on win/lose retribution, where victims and a healthy society are presumed to win by punishing criminals and loser scofflaws, lead us toward this noble, and globally multicultural, goal of achieving healthy democratic peace for all earth's regenerative creatures? retributive justice is the state's weapon to protect the common good from further injustice, a deterring threat; not a tool or medicine toward an actively remediating peace, domestic or international, private or public resonant health.