Vous avez cherché: irrelevant;irrelevant (Anglais - Turc)

this is irrelevant.
bu ilgisiz.

it's not irrelevant.
alakasız değil.

but it's not irrelevant.
ama alakasız da değil.

and that was completely irrelevant.
ama tabi bu çok anlamsızdı.

for others, the present is irrelevant.
diğerleri için, şimdi çok alakasızdır.

whether or not you like the music is irrelevant.
müziği beğenip beğenmemeniz önemli değil.

matching the reliability, base load is actually irrelevant.
güvenebilirlik açısından ana yük konu dışı kalıyor.

irrelevant people are deleted so as to highlight the leader.
lideri ortaya çıkarmak için fotoğraftaki önemsiz kişiler silinmiş.

whether one play is better or more important than the other is irrelevant.
bir oyunun diğerinden daha iyi ya da daha önemli olup olmadığının bir önemi yok.

and so the idea of a curriculum is completely irrelevant in a setting like this.
o halde müfredat kavramının bu tür bir ortamda yeri yoktur.

theater does not really seem to exist in serbia, it is completely irrelevant.
aslında sırbistan’da tiyatro yok gibi; tamamen önemsiz.

my wife started to fine me one dollar for every irrelevant fact i inserted into conversation.
eşim, sohbete kattığım her gereksiz bilgi için beni bir dolar ile cezalandırdı.

and if i took that journey, no matter whether it failed or succeeded, it would be completely irrelevant.
ve o seyahate çıkarsam, başarmam ya da kaybetmem mühim değil, sonuç tamamen alakasız olacaktı.

so if you take into account future generations as much as our own, every other moral imperative of philanthropic cost just becomes irrelevant.
eğer kendimiz kadar gelecek nesilleri hesaba katsaydık, philanthropik maliyetinin diğer her ahlaki zorunluluğu sadece önemsiz hale gelirdi.

ask a deceptive person to tell their story, they're going to pepper it with way too much detail in all kinds of irrelevant places.
yalancı bir insandan hikayesini anlatmasını isteyin, hikayeyi her türlü saçma yerde gereğinden fazla detayla anlatacaktır.

"turkey now risks becoming irrelevant in solving the region's problems, and that is a big loss for everyone."
Şimdi türkiye bölge sorunlarının çözümündeki önemini kaybetme riski taşıyor ki bu da herkes için büyük bir kayıp." dedi.

and so, gradually over these three days, you start off kind of trying to figure out, "why am i listening to all this irrelevant stuff?"
ve yavaş yavaş bu üç gün boyunca, siz de anlamaya başladınız, neden bütün bu ilgisiz şeyleri dinlediğinizi.

178 succeeding in numerical reasoning tests required level of accuracy, the relevance of data or the possibility of estimation, then decide the approach to take - whether to perform raw calculations, apply estimates, draw up an equation, or simply read a relationship or a trend off a chart. as is true in the case of verbal and abstract reasoning tests, a systematic approach will make your test-taking experience much more efficient. below, you will find a a summary of the recommended approach: 1. read the question and the answer options first as carefully as possible. 2. the question will help you identify which data sets will be relevant and necessary for answering the question and know what to ignore. 3. looking at the answer options will help you decide the level of accuracy required. if, for example, the values in the answer options are very far apart, you may consider estimation. 4. 4. based on the question, determine the relevant information and mentally "black out" the unnecessary data. 5. having looked at the answer options and the data in the table, you can now make a final decision about whether to go for an exact figure or make an estimate, whether to use an equation, and so on. before you start, think through your calculation method- ology step by step. 6. make sure you exclude all unrealistic answer options (for example numbers repre- senting an increase when the question refers to a decrease). 7. once you have performed your calculations, you can match the result against the remaining answer options. if you estimated, look for the answer option closest to your estimated result. if the result is significantly closer to one answer option than to all others, you were probably on the right track. practice methods finally, a few suggestions for how to practice for the numerical reasoning test: • • start your practice by identifying your weaknesses. percentages? subtraction? estimation? equations? calculus in general? or is it instead deciding what data is rel- evant when there is a great deal of irrelevant "noise" in the tables and charts? • • once you have identified your weaknesses, you should particularly practice these operations, all of which are tested in the next two chapters • make sure you check how many questions you will face in the actual exam and how much time you will have to answer them • start decreasing the time needed to answer the questions so it gets closer to the time available at the exam • • ideally, by the time of the exam, you should be able to answer more questions in the time available than required at the exam, because you cannot account for stress and other outside factors are impossible to recreate at home • • the epso test will be administered on a computer, which will make it much more challenging (and stranger) to take than a paper-based test where you can scribble on the paper and make quick calculations, write down equations, underline key concepts and so on - so if you have access to such services, try to practice online
succeeding in numerical reasoning tests 177 bus companies in the united states, 2013 company profit (in million usd) number of passengers (in millions) number of vehicles average vehicle utilization (%) greyhound 46 289 4560 since the question refers to the number of passengers carried, we will certainly not need profit data to answer the question, so let's black out that data: bus companies in the united states, 2013 company profit (in million usd) number of passengers (in millions) number of vehicles average vehicle utilization (%) greyhound 289 4560 73 based on our reasoning in the section on estimation, we will also realize that the number of vehicles is a superfluous figure, as is average vehicle utilization, so let's black those out too: bus companies in the united states, 2013 company profit (in million usd) number of passengers (in millions) number of vehicles average vehicle utilization (%) greyhound 289 if we systematically exclude all superfluous data, the task will seem significantly less complicated. as it turns out, in our example, the table's only purpose is to tell us that greyhound carried 289 million passengers in 2013! how to approach numerical reasoning tests this chapter demonstrated the number of factors we must consider in order to efficiently solve the problems posed in numerical reasoning tests. consider aspects such as the