Réalisées par des traducteurs professionnels, des entreprises, des pages web ou traductions disponibles gratuitement.
evidence and argumentation: a reply to everett (2009).
evidence and argumentation: a reply to everett (2009).
Dernière mise à jour : 2016-03-03
Fréquence d'utilisation : 1
Qualité :
"argument by analogy", in argumentation (2005) 19: 1–27.
"argument by analogy", in argumentation (2005) 19: 1–27.
Dernière mise à jour : 2016-03-03
Fréquence d'utilisation : 1
Qualité :
Avertissement : un formatage HTML invisible est présent
of the analysis begun in volume i, contains an extensive discussion of the rules of legal argumentation as a basis for the justification of court rulings in criminal law cases.
this work, a continuation of the analysis begun in volume i, contains an extensive discussion of the rules of legal argumentation as a basis for the justification of court rulings in criminal law cases.
Dernière mise à jour : 2013-02-19
Fréquence d'utilisation : 2
Qualité :
regarding the large number of governments which are reluctant to ratify the convention, nhris should analyse the reasons behind non-ratification including misconceptions and other obstacles, and work on argumentation catalogues to counter these concerns,
regarding the large number of governments which are reluctant to ratify the convention, nhris should analyse the reasons behind non-ratification including misconceptions and other obstacles, and work on argumentation catalogues to counter these concerns,
Dernière mise à jour : 2013-02-19
Fréquence d'utilisation : 2
Qualité :
in order to arrive at a more transparent and objective summary of the case, ban suggests that subparagraph (b) be placed in square brackets and remain open for modifications until the source for the case has been given to parties for review, and for the parties to weigh in with comments on whether the case has been adequately summarized and whether its argumentation is sound.
in order to arrive at a more transparent and objective summary of the case, ban suggests that subparagraph (b) be placed in square brackets and remain open for modifications until the source for the case has been given to parties for review, and for the parties to weigh in with comments on whether the case has been adequately summarized and whether its argumentation is sound.
Dernière mise à jour : 2013-02-19
Fréquence d'utilisation : 4
Qualité :