Vous avez cherché: whiteman (Arabe - Anglais)

() whiteman, op.
whiteman, op.

274 (marjorie whiteman ed., 1968).
article 4, para.

() whiteman, digest of international law, vol.
whiteman, digest of international law, vol. xiv, september 1970, p. 509.

انظر whiteman, digest of international law, vol.
see mcnair, op. cit., p. 714; and verzijl, op.

m. whiteman, digest of international law, vol.
m. whiteman, digest of international law, vol. viii, pp. 1273-1274.

whiteman (1965) 4 digest of international law, pp.
m. m. whiteman (1965) 4 digest of international law, pp. 534-535.

انظر whiteman, digest of international law, vol. xiv, pp.
whiteman, digest of international law, vol. xiv, pp. 502 and 503, letter dated 10 november 1948, to the attorney-general.

181 at pp. 191-2, citing whiteman, damages vol.
181, at pp. 191-2, citing whiteman, damages, vol. iii, p. 1997.

174-179, 181-182, 184); whiteman, damages,vol.
gabčíkovo-nagymaros project (hungary/slovakia), i.c.j.

() m. whiteman, damages in international law (1943), p.
m. whiteman, damages in international law (1943), p. 1320.

() whiteman, digest of international law, vol. xiv, p.509-510.
whiteman, digest of international law, vol. xiv, pp. 509 and 510.

من الأمثلة قضية ماجي (1874) (whiteman, damages, vol. i, p.
183)) and by the iran-united states claims tribunal (see general electric company v.

marjorie m. whiteman, 14 digest of international law 490-510 (1970).
marjorie m. whiteman, 14 digest of international law 490-510 (1970).

whiteman, digest of international law, department of state, washington d.c., vol.
in addition, aside from the description by p.-h. imbert himself (ibid., pp. 33-38), see m.m. whiteman, digest of international law, department of state, washington, d.c., 1970, vol. 14, pp. 141-144 or j.m. ruda, op.

648; whiteman, damages, vol iii, pp. 1704, 1860، حيث انتهت مدة الامتياز.
648; whiteman, damages, vol iii, pp. 1704, 1860, where the concession had expired.

() whiteman، المرجع السابق، المجلد 6، الصفحة 260، في الصفحة 262.
whiteman, op. cit., vol. 6, p. 260, at p. 262.

وقد ورد في وجيز وايتمان (whiteman's digest) وصف للتغير في ممارسة الولايات المتحدة.
the change in united states practice is reflected in whiteman's digest.

64), the petit vaisseau case (1863) (whiteman, damages, 2nd series, vol.
islamic republic of iran, (1991) 26 iran-u.s.c.t.r.

وانظر أيضا: b. m. whiteman, digest of international law (1967), p.1215(.
see also b. m. whiteman, digest of international law (1967), p. 1215.

ويجب إقامة الدليل على أنها كانت متوقعة بطريقة معقولة، وأن المكاسب المرتقبة كانت غالبة وليست محتملة فحسب"، whiteman, damages, vol.
there must be proof that they were reasonably anticipated; and that the profits anticipated were probable and not merely possible”: whiteman, damages, vol. iii, p. 1837.