Vous avez cherché: whose (Italien - Anglais)

whose hand?
whose hand?

cats they whose are?
cats they are?

il termine “whose”
if you notice, you will see that in the negative sentences, we use the word “any”.

“yeah, but whose plan?
“yeah, but whose plan?

whose fault?? fb2's fault.
whose fault?? fb2's fault.

whose? – si riferisce a una persona
whose? –refers to a person

nothing, but nothing can stop an idea whose time has come.
nothing, but nothing can stop an idea whose time has come.

"food safety: whose responsibility is it?" (1994).
"food safety: whose responsibility is it?" (1994).

“whose” si usa sia con i sostantivi singolari che plurali.
there is, there are – short answers when we are speaking in english, we do not just say “yes” or “no”. this is how we answer in the affirmative and the negative with “there is” and “there are”.

usiamo il termine “whose” per chiedere a chi appartiene una certa cosa.
there is another way we can use “there is” and “there are” in the negative.

airports whose annual traffic is more than 1 million passenger movements or 25.000 tons of freight
airports whose annual traffic is more than 1 million passenger movements or 25 000 tons of freight

a package arrives in africa to save the lives of orphaned children whose lives have been struck by hiv/aids .
a package arrives in africa to save the lives of orphaned children whose lives have been struck by hiv/aids.

eu-25 member state performance in meeting 0% target for directives whose transposition is over 2 years late, as at 10.11.2007
eu-25 member state performance in meeting 0% target for directives whose transposition is over 2 years late, as at 10/11/2007

there was once a man, whose wife was dead, and a woman, whose husband was dead; and the man had a daughter, and so had the woman.
there was once a man, whose wife was dead, and a woman, whose husband was dead; and the man had a daughter, and so had the woman.

e’ però una cosidetta “international commission for orders of chivalry” nel suo report (edinburgh), 1978) che, mentre riconosce il principio di legittimità e della qualità di fons honorum del sovrano non regnante, cerca di limitare il principio, definendo per “casa sovrana” una di quelle “whose sovereign rank was internationally recognized at the time of the congress of vienna in 1814 or later”, e cioè una di quelle il cui rango sovrano fu internazionalmente riconosciuto al tempo del congresso di vienna del 1814 o dopo.
although the so-called international commission for orders of chivalry in its report (edinburgh, 1978), while recognising in principle the legitimacy and the quality of fons honorum of a non-reigning sovereign house sought to limit this principle defining as “sovereign house” one “whose sovereign rank was internationally recognised at the time of the congress of vienna in 1814 or later” and thus one of those whose sovereign rank was internationally recognised at the time of the congress of vienna or later.