Réalisées par des traducteurs professionnels, des entreprises, des pages web ou traductions disponibles gratuitement.
javna seja
public session
Dernière mise à jour : 2017-04-26
Fréquence d'utilisation : 1
Qualité :
javna naročila
public procurement
Dernière mise à jour : 2017-04-26
Fréquence d'utilisation : 17
Qualité :
v smislu varnega pristana je ustrezna navedba javna izjava organizacije, da bo spoštovala načela varnega pristana.
in the context of the safe harbor, the relevant representation is the organization's public declaration that it will adhere to the safe harbor principles.
na kratko torej, če javna izjava delodajalca v okviru postopka zaposlovanja, katere namen je izključiti kandidature oseb določene rase oziroma
in short, it would defeat the very purpose of the directive if public statements made by an employer in the context of a recruitment drive, to the effect that applications from persons of a certain ethnic origin
b) ali lahko diskriminacija iz aprila 2005 (javna izjava aprila 2005) pomeni potem domnevo o izvajanju neposredno diskriminatorne zaposlovalne politike?
(b) does an established act of discrimination in april 2005 (public announcement in april 2005) subsequently give rise to a presumption of the continuation of a directly discriminatory recruitment policy?
dogodek, ki ne povzroči obveze takoj, jo lahko povzroči kasneje zaradi spremembe zakona ali ker kako dejanje (na primer dovolj natančna javna izjava) podjetja povzroči posredno obvezo.
an event that does not give rise to an obligation immediately may do so at a later date, because of changes in the law or because an act (for example, a sufficiently specific public statement) by the enterprise gives rise to a constructive obligation.
a) do katere mere dejstva pred diskriminacijo (javna izjava o merilih za izbor, ki so neposredno diskriminatorna, aprila 2005) pomenijo ‚dejstva, na podlagi katerih se lahko domneva, da je pri�lo do neposredne ali posredne diskriminacije‘ iz člena 8(1) direktive [2000/43]?
(a) to what extent do earlier acts of discrimination (public announcement of directly discriminatory selection criteria in april 2005) constitute ‘facts from which it may be presumed that there has been direct or indirect discrimination’ within the terms of article 8(1) of [directive 2000/43]?