Hai cercato la traduzione di ways introduction da Coreano a Inglese

Coreano

Traduttore

ways introduction

Traduttore

Inglese

Traduttore
Traduttore

Traduci istantaneamente testi, documenti e voce con Lara

Traduci ora

Contributi umani

Da traduttori professionisti, imprese, pagine web e archivi di traduzione disponibili gratuitamente al pubblico.

Aggiungi una traduzione

Coreano

Inglese

Informazioni

Coreano

예 6-1. ways of escaping from html

Inglese

there are four sets of tags which can be used to denote blocks of php code.

Ultimo aggiornamento 2011-10-24
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:

Coreano

can this script be used in unintended ways?

Inglese

can unusual or undesirable data be acted upon?

Ultimo aggiornamento 2011-10-24
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:

Coreano

there are basically two ways to compile modules:

Inglese

use the provided "make" mechanism in the ext directory, which also allows building of dynamic loadable modules.

Ultimo aggiornamento 2011-10-24
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:

Attenzione: contiene formattazione HTML nascosta

Coreano

anneyonghaseyo jungkook iam siyoli malia form india it is an korean name my full name is sherlly maria iam an ordinary life girl sorry for the long introduction

Inglese

anneyonghaseyo jungkook iam siyoli malia form india it is an korean name my full name is sherlly maria iam an ordinary life girl sorry for the long introduction

Ultimo aggiornamento 2024-05-17
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:

Coreano

a nice introduction to php by stig sæther bakken can be found here on the zend website. also, much of the php conference material is freely available.

Inglese

also, much of the php conference material is freely available.

Ultimo aggiornamento 2011-10-24
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:

Coreano

certain items that may appear in patterns are more efficient than others. it is more efficient to use a character class like [aeiou] than a set of alternatives such as (a_bar_e_bar_i_bar_o_bar_u). in general, the simplest construction that provides the required behaviour is usually the most efficient. jeffrey friedl's book contains a lot of discussion about optimizing regular expressions for efficient performance. when a pattern begins with .* and the pcre_dotall option is set, the pattern is implicitly anchored by pcre, since it can match only at the start of a subject string. however, if pcre_dotall is not set, pcre cannot make this optimization, because the. metacharacter does not then match a newline, and if the subject string contains newlines, the pattern may match from the character immediately following one of them instead of from the very start. for example, the pattern (.*) second matches the subject "first\nand second" (where \n stands for a newline character) with the first captured substring being "and". in order to do this, pcre has to retry the match starting after every newline in the subject. if you are using such a pattern with subject strings that do not contain newlines, the best performance is obtained by setting pcre_dotall, or starting the pattern with ^.* to indicate explicit anchoring. that saves pcre from having to scan along the subject looking for a newline to restart at. beware of patterns that contain nested indefinite repeats. these can take a long time to run when applied to a string that does not match. consider the pattern fragment (a+)* this can match "aaaa" in 33 different ways, and this number increases very rapidly as the string gets longer. (the * repeat can match 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 times, and for each of those cases other than 0, the + repeats can match different numbers of times.) when the remainder of the pattern is such that the entire match is going to fail, pcre has in principle to try every possible variation, and this can take an extremely long time. an optimization catches some of the more simple cases such as (a+)*b where a literal character follows. before embarking on the standard matching procedure, pcre checks that there is a "b" later in the subject string, and if there is not, it fails the match immediately. however, when there is no following literal this optimization cannot be used. you can see the difference by comparing the behaviour of (a+)*\d with the pattern above. the former gives a failure almost instantly when applied to a whole line of "a" characters, whereas the latter takes an appreciable time with strings longer than about 20 characters.

Inglese

the former gives a failure almost instantly when applied to a whole line of "a" characters, whereas the latter takes an appreciable time with strings longer than about 20 characters.

Ultimo aggiornamento 2011-10-24
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:

Attenzione: contiene formattazione HTML nascosta

Alcuni contributi umani con scarsa rilevanza sono stati nascosti.
Mostra i risultati con scarsa rilevanza.

Ottieni una traduzione migliore grazie a
9,170,019,049 contributi umani

Ci sono utenti che chiedono aiuto:



I cookie ci aiutano a fornire i nostri servizi. Utilizzando tali servizi, accetti l'utilizzo dei cookie da parte nostra. Maggiori informazioni. OK