Hai cercato la traduzione di fornuftig investor da Danese a Inglese

hvad er kriterierne for en "fornuftig privat investor"?
what is the prudent private investor criterion?

har bsca forholdt sig som en fornuftig privat investor?
did bsca take the prudent private investor approach?

det ville have været meget mere interessant for en fornuftig investor at investere på børsmarkedet.
investing in the stock market would have been a much more interesting investment for a prudent market investor.

wien — konkret er af den opfattelse, at Öiag ikke har handlet som en fornuftig privat investor.
wien — konkret is also of the opinion that Öiag did not act as a prudent private investor.

enhver fornuftig privat investor ville ved et sådant lån have krævet en højere sats og specifikke sikkerhedsstillelser i selskabets aktiver.
any prudent private investor would have carried out such a transaction at a higher cost for which he would have demanded specific guarantees linked to the company's assets.

det anses ikke desto mindre for at være hensigtsmæssigt at justere kapitalomkostningerne, hvilket enhver fornuftig privat investor ville skulle gøre.
however, it calibrates the cost of raising capital. this would have to be done by any rational private investor.

derfor følger fmea i sine investeringer samme taktik som renault, der er en fornuftig investor, der arbejder under markedsøkonomiske vilkår.
consequently, the fmea interventions follow the same approach as that adopted by renault, which is itself a prudent investor operating in a market economy.

foranstaltningerne er ikke i overensstemmelse med princippet om den fornuftige markedsøkonomiske investor
the measures at issue do not satisfy the test of a prudent private investor operating under normal market conditions;

den kronologi i begivenhederne, som de franske myndigheder her påviser, skulle i sig selv være dokumentation for, at staten handlede som en fornuftig investor.
the chronology of events illustrated by the french authorities in itself demonstrated the prudent character of the state's conduct.

kommissionen er enig med de franske myndigheder i, at enhver fornuftig investor ville have fulgt denne tilgang, inden vedkommende støttede selskabet på nogen måde.
the commission agrees with the french authorities that these steps are those which any prudent private investor would have taken before entering into any commitment to support the company.

hvis erklæringerne ikke var blevet fremsat, ville ingen fornuftig investor have tilbudt et aktionærforskud under disse omstændigheder og alene have påtaget sig en meget stor finansiel risiko.
if the statements had not been made, no reasonable investor would have offered a shareholder’s advance in these circumstances and assumed alone a very large financial risk.

cégétel hævder, at de franske myndigheders betingelser for kreditbevillingen ikke er i overensstemmelse med de betingelser, en fornuftig investor ville stille for at deltage i en sådan investering.
cégétel maintains that the terms of grant of the credit line by the french authorities are not in keeping with those granted by a prudent investor in relation to one of his participations.

i den forbindelse er det ikke nok blot at hævde, at man har tænkt sig at bære sig ad som en fornuftig investor, for at overholde statsstøttereglerne i almindelighed og det markedsøkonomiske investorprincip i særdeleshed.
affirming one's intention to behave like a prudent investor is not enough when it comes to complying with the rules on state aid, and in particular with the prudent private investor principle.

beslutningen om at lade støtten gå igennem erap afspejler ifølge cégétel heller ikke en fornuftig investors adfærd.
in cégétel's opinion, opting to channel the aid through erap is not what a prudent investor would have done.

en fornuftig investor ville f.eks. aldrig have accepteret den gældsfinansierede opkøbspolitik, som førte til, at ft var i en så kritisk finansieringssituation, at staten måtte gennemføre en kapitaltilførsel.
more particularly, a prudent investor would never have agreed to the policy of financing acquisitions through debt which placed france télécom in a critical financial situation such that the state had to carry out a recapitalisation.

bt tilføjer i denne forbindelse, at det i henhold til domstolens retspraksis ikke kan hævdes, at statens hjælp til ft svarer til adfærden hos en fornuftig investor, hvis eneste mål var at gøre ft til en rentabel virksomhed.
bouygues telecom adds in this regard that, in accordance with the case law of the court of justice of the european communities, it cannot be maintained that the commitments entered into by the state towards france télécom are a reflection of the conduct of a prudent investor solely on the ground that france télécom had become a profitable company.

en hypotetisk investor handler som en fornuftig investor [30], der ønsker at maksimere sin fortjeneste uden dog at løbe en for stor risiko i forhold til afkastet [31].
the attitude of a hypothetical investor is that of a prudent investor [30], whose goal of profit maximisation is tempered with caution about the level of risk acceptable for a given rate of return. [31]

samtidig valgte staten at modtage sit udbytte for 2002 i aktier i stedet for i kontanter, hvilket også var en måde for staten at vise markedet, at ft havde opbakning fra staten, mens en fornuftig investor ville have valgt at få udbyttet udbetalt kontant.
at the same time, the state's option for its 2002 dividends to be paid in shares and not in cash is another signal by the state to the market that it supports france télécom even though a prudent investor would have opted for payment of the dividends in cash.

således ville ingen fornuftig investor i september 2002 (hvor staten bebudede, at den ville yde ft finansiel støtte) have lånt en virksomhed 9 mia. eur under sådanne vilkår uden at tage udgangspunkt i en omstruktureringsplan.
thus, no prudent investor would, in september 2002 (when the state announced that it would be supporting france télécom financially), have advanced eur 9 billion under such economic circumstances without basing itself on a restructuring plan.

det vil bl.a. være tilfældet for det offentlige foretagende ifp, som juridisk har mulighed for (og ikke pligt til) at tilføre et datterselskab i vanskeligheder ny kapital efter de samme skønskriterier som enhver fornuftig investor.
this is the case in particular for ifp, which has the legal possibility (and not the obligation) to recapitalise a subsidiary in difficulties according to the same assessment criteria as any prudent investor. finally, the french authorities deny that epics have any possibility at all of ‘direct access’ to ‘treasury imprest accounts’.