Hai cercato la traduzione di leverandørvalg da Danese a Inglese

frit leverandØrvalg
free choice of supplier

d. frit leverandørvalg
d. free choice of supplier

4.9 frit leverandørvalg.
4.9 free choice of supplier.

forbrugerne bør indrømmes de rettigheder, som eu opstillet, og de bør have frit leverandørvalg.
consumers should also have their eu-established rights recognised and have the freedom to choose the supplier they want.

hvomår vil der foreligge en ny ordning for reglerne om gasproduktion og det frie leverandørvalg?
how long will it be before the sector is restructured in the interests of competition between energy producers and freedom of choice for customers?

frit leverandørvalg de kvantitative elementer medfører en grad vis fritstilling af alle elektricitets- og gasforbrugere til at vælge deres leverandør.
reporting for the committee, carlos carnero gonzÁlez (pes, e) says that the issue of whether or not the eu has legal personality is disputable.

for alt for mange af europas borgere er processen med at udvikle ægte konkurrencemarkeder imidlertid langtfra færdig, og de har ikke noget reelt leverandørvalg.
for far too many of europe's citizens, however, the process of developing real competitive markets is far from complete, and they are not in a position to make a real choice of supplier.

som tidligere nævnt har dette navnlig stor betydning i overgangsperioden med en gradvis åbning for frit leverandørvalg, hvor de små og mellemstore virksomheders konkurrenceevne formindskes.
as mentioned above, this is particularly significant during the transitional period when the freedom to choose a supplier is gradually introduced, as the competitiveness of smes suffers.

ifølge forslaget skal alle ikke-husholdningskunder have frit leverandørvalg senest den 1. januar 2003, og markedet skal åbnes fuldstændigt to år senere.
in the electricity sector, all non-domestic clients will therefore be able to choose freely as of 1 january 2003, with full market opening two years later.

eØsu mener, at hvis denne klausul anvendes, bør der fastsættes en øvre grænse for den minimale kontraktvarighed, således at man ikke udhuler retten til frit leverandørvalg med overdrevent lange kontraktbindinger og vidtrækkende sanktioner.
the eesc believes that in such cases there should be a ceiling on the minimum duration of contracts, so as not to undermine the right to choose a supplier by imposing exaggeratedly long durations and large penalties.

ifølge denne tosidede model var der et offentligt forsyningssegment og et konkurrencesegment, og kunder med frit leverandørvalg (som der blev stadig flere af) fik mulighed for at gå over til konkurrencesegmentet.
under this dual model there was a public utility segment and a competitive segment, and eligible customers (the scope of which gradually enlarged) were allowed to switch to the competitive segment.

det blev imidlertid fastslået i undersøgelsen, at dette salg ikke kunne ases for at bære bundent, dvs. solgt på det bundne marked, eftersom salget skete til markedspris, og køberne havde frit leverandørvalg.
however, it was established in the investigation that these sales cannot be considered as being captive, i.e. sales on the captive market, because they were made at market prices and the buyers had a free choice of supplier.

—sikre et frit leverandørvalg inden for el og gas fra 2004 for alle erhvervskunder (hvilket svarer til mindst 60% af det samlede marked) og etablereen national tilsynsinstans.
– in electricity and gas, ensure freedom of choice of supplier as of 2004 for allnon-household consumers (amounting to at least 60% of the total market)and establish a national regulatory function.

formandskabet mener, at rådet i barcelona skal markere starten på et egentligt energimarked, som overstiger minimumsgrænserne i det nuværende direktiv. for at opnå det er der behov for at vedtage ambitiøse liberaliseringsplaner for gas- og elsektorerne for at fremme det frie leverandørvalg, især på virksomhedsmarkedet.
the presidency believes that the barcelona council must mark the beginning of a genuine energy market which exceeds the minimum limits laid down in the current directive, and this requires the adoption of ambitious liberalisation timetables in the gas and electricity sectors in order to favour the free choice of provider, especially in the companies market.