Hai cercato la traduzione di agrosciences da Greco a Inglese

Όνομα dow agrosciences ltd
name dow agrosciences ltd

Επωνυμία dow agrosciences europe ltd
name dow agrosciences europe ltd

Διάταξη του Πρωτοδικείου (δεύτερο τμήμα) της 17ης Ιουνίου 2008 — dow agrosciences κατά ΕΑΑΤ
order of the court of first instance (second chamber) of 17 june 2008 — dow agrosciences v efsa

dow agrosciences europe ltd., european development centre, 3 milton park, abingdon, oxon ox14 4rn, united kingdom
dow agrosciences europe ltd., european development centre, 3 milton park, abingdon, oxon ox14 4rn, united kingdom

εξ ονόματος της dow agrosciences llc, 9330 zionsville road, indianapolis, in 46268-1054, Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες της Αμερικής
on behalf of dow agrosciences llc, 9330 zionsville road, indianapolis, in 46268-1054, united states

6.5.2003 — Υπόθεση Τ-45/02 — dow agrosciences bv κλπ. κατά Κοινοβουλίου και Συμβουλίου.
6.5.2003: case t-45/02 dow agro-sciences and others ν parliament and council.

Η dow agrosciences ltd, η Ευρωπαϊκή Αρχή για την Ασφάλεια των Τροφίμων (ΕΑΑΤ) και η Επιτροπή φέρουν εκάστη τα δικαστικά τους έξοδα.
orders dow agrosciences ltd, the european food safety authority (efsa) and the commission each to bear their own costs.

Αντιθέτωƒ, €ε τιƒ διατάξειƒ εpiί των υpiοθέσεων cheminova κ.λpi. κατά Εpiιτροpiή (113), fmc chemical κ.λpi. κατά Εpiιτροpiή (114) και dow agrosciences κ.λpi. κατά Εpiιτροpiή (115), οι τέσσεριƒ αιτήσειƒ αναστολήƒ αpiοφάσεων €ε τιƒ οpiοίεƒ είχε εpiιβληθεί αpiαγόρευση ε€piορίαƒ ορισ€ένων ουσιών αpiορρίφθηκαν λόγω ελλείψεωƒ εpiείγοντοƒ, €ε το σκεpiτικό ότι η ζη€ία piου οι αpiοφάσειƒ αυτέƒ ενδέχετο να piροκαλέσουν στιƒ αιτούσεƒ δεν ε€φανιζόταν αρκούντωƒ σοβαρή, καθόσον αντιστοιχούσε σε λιγότερο του 1 % του κύκλου εργασιών τουƒ.
the condition relating to urgency was also considered to be fullled. after considering that there was a serious risk that the applicant would suer an irreversible loss of market share, which might admittedly be subject to subsequent financial compensation, the president nonetheless considered that, in the circumstances of the case, the gravity of the loss could not be based solely on the accounting value of the business which generated the market shares and on the loss of such value to the whole group of undertakings, but must take account of the fact that the applicants had been present on the market for more than 20 years, that they had beneted from authorisations to put usilazole on the market for many uses in a number of member states and that their products enjoyed a reputation on the market that might be signicantly damaged by a ban on usilazole.