Hai cercato la traduzione di the defendant filed enclosure 8 da Inglese a Malese

a joint and several liability of the defendant
bersama dan beberapa liabiliti defendan

the defendant company has by a letter of consent dated
telah melaksanakan

having been duly authorised to do so, i affirm this affidavit for and on behalf of the defendant.
dari yang disebutkan di atas

the parties will file a writ of summons when all our documents are completed and we will send a copy of the writ of summons to you as a solicitor on behalf of the defendant after the writ of the suit is filed
pihak akan menfailkan writ saman apabila semua dokumen kami telahpun lengkap dan kami akan menghantar sesalinan writ saman tersebut kepada pihak tuan selaku peguamcara bagi pihak defendan setelah writ saman tersebut difailkan

in the project and the total amount of the completed service works and the outstanding amount due to the defendant to the plaintiff.
10. dalam perbincangan untuk penyelesaian, kedua-dua pihak telah bersetuju dengan jumlah-jumlah berikut:-

the plaintiff and the defendant were married on 14 march 20219 at seburah rumah ber address in sg chih by appointing an agent to manage the marriage
plaintif dan defendan telah bernikah pada 14 mac 20219 di sebuah rumah beralamat di sg chih dengan melantik seorang ejen bagi menguruskan pernikahan tersebut

9. the defendant subsequently made part of the payment to the plaintiff of rm15,000.00 but there was still an outstanding total balance to the plaintiff of rm184,588.76 which was still owed
9. defendan kemudiannya telah membuat sebahagian pembayaran kepada plaintif sebanyak rm15,000.00 namun masih terdapat jumlah baki yang masih tertunggak kepada plaintif sebanyak rm184,588.76 yang masih terhutang

we can relate this case to the plaintiff khalid samad while hassan ali as the defendant actually defamed khalid and that the words issued by the defendant were bad because the case involved words spoken at the ceremony in a video uploaded on social media and disseminated. extended to others.
kita boleh mengaitkan kes ini plaintiff iaitu khalid samad manakala hassan ali sebagai defendan sememangnya memfitnah khalid dan bahawa kata kata yang dikeluarkan oleh defedan adalah teruk kerana kes itu melibatkan kata kata yang diucapkan dalam majlis di dalam satu video yang dimuat naik di media sosial dan disebarkan secara meluas kepada orang lain.

the 1st plaintiff had then lodged several police reports in relation to the defendant’s action and his continued unlawful possession of the said lorry. the defendant had unlawfully used and continue to use the said lorry for his personal gain even though the said lorry does not have any road tax and insurance.
tindakan undang-undang translationthe defendan bagi satu deklarasi untuk mengesahkan perjanjian ditamatkan melalui saman pemula penekan no. 24ncvc-264-02/2015 dipukul pada 18-5-2015 oleh mahkamah tinggi. tiada tindakan selanjutnya diambil oleh defendan. meskipun defendan masih enggan untuk membayar atau kembali ke lori tersebut kepada plaintif dalam its 1.

1. if the plaintiff does not have any protection in the interests of the property, the caveat should be included in 2012 and not only in 2016. the defendant argues that this clearly indicates that the plaintiff has knowledge of the will and the plaintiff is not satisfied that the deceased left the will. on behalf of the defendant alone. defendants, therefore, assert that this was a later thought and was made maliciously
1. jikalau plaintiff sememangnya tidak mempunyai sebarang perlindungan bagi kepentingan hartanah tersebut, kaveat seharusnya dimasukkan pada tahun 2012 dan bukannya hanya pada tahun 2016. pihak defendan menegaskan bahawa ini amat jelas membuktikan bahawa plaintif mempunyai pengetahuan tentang wasiat tersebut dan plaintif tidak berpuashati si mati meninggalkan wasiat atas nama defendan seorang sahaja. oleh itu, defendan menegaskan bahawa ini merupakan satu pemikiran kemudian dan dibuat secara mal