Da traduttori professionisti, imprese, pagine web e archivi di traduzione disponibili gratuitamente al pubblico.
staying two metres (six feet) away from other people is usually enough to prevent transmission through this route.
ang pananatili sa dalawang metro (anim na talampakan) na layo sa ibang mga tao ay karaniwang sapat upang maiwasan ang pagkahawa sa pamamagitan ng rutang ito.
in the us there is also the recommendation that newborns and mothers should be temporarily separated until transmission-based precautions are discontinued, and that where this is not possible the newborn should be kept 2 metres away from the mother.
mayroon din ang rekomendasyon sa us na dapat pansamantalang paghiwalayin ang mga ina at bagong silang na sanggol hanggang sa mahinto ang mga pag-iingat na batay sa pagkakahawa, at sa kung saan hindi ito posibleng gawin, dapat na panatilihing may layong 2 metro ang sanggol mula sa ina.
total population (in millions) of finland in 2015 was: 5 531 / 1 009. 4 5.47949 since the artificial land cover area was provided in million square metres, the total population we calculated is also in millions. the total population (in millions) of slovakia in 2015 was: 1 461 / 269. 4 5.42316 therefore the difference (in millions) in the populations of finland and slovakia in 2015 was: 5.47949 - 5.42316 = 0.05633 we need to convert our answer to units by multiplying by 1 million: 0.05633 * 1 000 000 = 56 330 potential shortcuts / pitfalls we need to be careful in applying the per capita formula. if we multiply the per capita figure with the area, our answer will be incorrect. the artificial land cover area is pro- vided in million square metres. we must account for this in our calculations. we can solve our problem in millions but the answer choices are provided in units. we must therefore convert the final popula- tion figure from millions to units. q2. what was the european union's artificial land cover per capita (in square metres per capita) in 2009 excluding france? a. 322. 8 b. 332. 1 c. 342. 4 d. 347. 3 e. 353. 1 correct answer: below data interpretation from the tables we need:
q1. what was the difference in the pop- ulations of finland and slovakia in 2015? a. 56 330 b. 168 092 c. 5 189 398 d. 5 423 163 e. 56 330 000 correct answer: a data interpretation from the tables we need: the 2015 artificial land cover of finland the 2015 artificial land cover per capita of finland the 2015 artificial land cover of slovakia the 2015 artificial land cover per capita of slovakia reasoning we need to calculate the populations of finland and slovakia in 2015 by using the respective artificial land cover areas and per capita figures. we can then calculate the difference in population. calculation artifical land cover artificial land cover per capita total population hence artifical land cover total population = artificial land cover per capita substituting the data from the table, the
Ultimo aggiornamento 2021-05-07
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:
Riferimento:
